中美抗震规范地震作用的比较分析
|
摘要
主要通过对现行的中国抗震规范GB 50011—2010和美国规范IBC—2009中关于抗震设防目标、场地类别、地震作用的计算方法进行比较分析,确定了其换算关系,比较了两本规范计算所得地震力的差异,最后给出了对于混凝土框架结构两本规范最大基底剪力的对照表,供工程人员参考。
By comparing and studying the difference between Chinese code GB50011—2010 and American code IBC—2009 about the seismic design goal setting,site classification,seismic load calculation equations,a converted method has been developed to using the American code IBC—2009 to calculate the seismic loads in Chinese seismic zone,and a seismic base shear comparison table about concrete frame is given for engineer reference.
By comparing and studying the difference between Chinese code GB50011—2010 and American code IBC—2009 about the seismic design goal setting,site classification,seismic load calculation equations,a converted method has been developed to using the American code IBC—2009 to calculate the seismic loads in Chinese seismic zone,and a seismic base shear comparison table about concrete frame is given for engineer reference.
引文
[1]吕红山,赵凤新.适用于中国场地分类的地震动反应谱放大系数[J].地震学报,2007,29(1):67-76.
[2]罗开海,王亚勇.中美欧抗震设计规范地震动参数换算关系的研究[J].建筑结构,2006,36(8):103-107.
[3]席春华.中美抗震规范的结构基底地震剪力比较[J].建筑结构,2008,38(5):62-64.
[4]GB 50011—2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
[5]IBS—2009 International building code[S].International Code Council,Inc.,2009.
[6]SEI/ASCE7-05 Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures[S].2005.
[2]罗开海,王亚勇.中美欧抗震设计规范地震动参数换算关系的研究[J].建筑结构,2006,36(8):103-107.
[3]席春华.中美抗震规范的结构基底地震剪力比较[J].建筑结构,2008,38(5):62-64.
[4]GB 50011—2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
[5]IBS—2009 International building code[S].International Code Council,Inc.,2009.
[6]SEI/ASCE7-05 Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures[S].2005.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心