小江断裂中段及其邻近地区应力场时间变化分析
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
研究地壳构造应力状态及其时空分布特征,特别是应力变化的信息,是探讨地震成因、分析发震条件的重要有效途径之一.本文利用1998年1月至2009年1月以来小江断裂中段及其邻区ML≥2.5的共计740个震源机制解,基于小江断裂中段及其邻近地区地质构造背景,对研究区进行了分区;以该区域内较大地震为界,结合余震时间序列特征,进行时间上的分段;去除较大地震后,采用最长距离聚类分析方法对各分区的地震进行了分类.在此基础上,利用Gephart的应力张量反演方法,根据震源机制解资料反演出了各分区的优势应力场.结果表明,在观测时段内,根据构造和震源机制,可将研究区域分为A和B两个区域.A区最大主应力σ1方位在4个时段内大致为NNW向,B区北部在4个时段内σ1方位大致为NNW向、WNW和ENE向.从应力结构看,A区和B区北部应力以水平作用为主.B区南部σ1方位大致为NNW向,仍以水平作用为主;B区北部σ1方位变化较大,可能与B区北部地质结构复杂、应力调整活跃有关.而A区主应力方位相对稳定,显示了滇中块体的稳定性.
The study on temporal and spatial crustal stress change is important for exploring earthquake origin and seismogenic condition.Based on 740 focal mechanism solutions of ML≥2.5 earthquakes occurred during Jan.1998 to Jan.2009 in middle Xiaojiang fault and its adjacent area,the studied region was divided into sub-regions,and temporally further divided into phases with the larger earthquakes as boundary of the sub-regions.After removal of the larger earthquakes this paper inverted the focal mechanism data with the method of Gephart for the stress in main phase of each sub-region.The result indicates that the azimuth of maximum principal stress σ1 in 4 temporal phases of the sub-region A is approximately NNW--SSE,and in northern part of sub-region B are approximately NNW--SSE,WNW--ESE and ENE--WSW.The azimuth of σ1 in southern part of sub-region B is approximately NNW-SSE.The azimuth of σ1 in northern part of sub-region B changed significantly,while the azimuth of σ1 in sub-region A is relatively stable.This result may be related to the complicated structure and possible stress adjusting in northern sub-region B.The σ1 directions in sub-region A may indicate seismically relative stability of the central Yunnan crustal block.
引文
程万正,刁桂苓,吕弋培,张永久,李桂芳,陈天长.2003.川滇地块的震源力学机制、运动速率和活动方式[J].地震地质,25(1):71-87.
    崔效锋,谢富仁,张红艳.2006.川滇地区现代构造应力场分区及动力学意义[J].地震学报,28(5):451-461.
    刁桂苓,于利民,李钦祖.1992.震源机制解的系统聚类分析:以海城地震序列为例[J].中国地震,8(3):86-92.
    刁桂苓,于利民,宁杰远,孙佩卿,张子广.1993.1989年大同震群的体破裂特征[J].地球物理学报,36(3):360-368.
    邓起东.2007.中国活动构造图(1∶400万)[M].北京:地震出版社:1.
    阚荣举,张四昌,晏凤桐.1977.我国西南地区现代构造应力场与现代构造活动特征的探讨[J].地球物理学报,20(2):96-109.
    阚荣举.1980.西南地区现代构造应力场与板内强震活动[J].地震研究,3(3):45-59.
    胡新亮,刁桂苓,马瑾,李雪英,高景春,王勤彩.2004.利用数字地震记录的珚P,S珔振幅比资料测定小震震源机制解的可靠性分析[J].地震地质,26(2):347-352.
    李坪,汪良谋.1975.云南川西地区地震地质基本特征的探讨[J].地质科学,(4):308-325.
    梁尚鸿,李幼铭,束沛镒,朱碚定.1984.利用区域地震台网P、S振幅比资料测定小震震源参数[J].地球物理学报,27(3):249-257.
    林向东.2009.小江断裂中段及其邻近地区震源机制解与构造应力场分析[D].兰州:中国地震局兰州地震研究所:37-38.
    林向东,徐平,武敏捷,武安绪.2010.小江断裂中段及邻区构造应力场分布特征[J].中国地震,26(2):192-200.
    王绍晋,龙晓帆,余庆坤.2005.昆明地区现代构造应力场分析[J].地震研究,28(2):178-184.
    许忠淮,阎明,赵仲和.1983.由多个小地震推断的华北地区构造应力场的方向[J].地震学报,5(3):268-279.
    许忠淮,汪素云,黄雨蕊,高阿甲,金小锋,常向东.1987.由多个小震推断的青甘和川滇地区地壳应力场的方向特征[J].地球物理学报,30(5):476-486.
    谢富仁,苏刚,崔效锋.2001.滇西南地区现代构造应力场分析[J].地震学报,23(1):17-23.
    Chen Y,Li L,Li J,Li G.2008.Wenchuan earthquake:Way of thinking is changed[J].Episodes,31:374-377.
    Castillo,D A,Zoback M D.1995.Systematic stress variations in the southern San Joaquin Valley and along the WhiteWolf Fault:Implications for the rupture mechanics of the1952MS7.8Kern County earthquake and contemporarySeismicity[J].J Geophys Res,100:6249-6264.
    Dreger D,Savage B.1999.Aftershocks of the1952Kern County,California,earthquake sequence[J].Bull Seism SocAmer,89(4):1094-1108.
    Gephart J W.1990.FMSI:A Fortran program for inverting fault/slickenside and earthquake focal mechanism data to ob-tain the regional stress tensor[J].Computer&Geoscience,16(7):953-989.
    Hauksson E,Jones L M,Hutton K.1995.The1994Northridge earthquake sequence in California:Seismological andtectonic aspects[J].J Geophys Res,100:12335-12355.
    Lin X D,Xu P,Wu M J,Wu A X.2011.Inversion of stress fields in the middle section of the Xiaojiang fault and its ad-jacent area[J].Earthquake Research in China,25(1):82-91.
    Oppenheimer D H.1990.Aftershock slip behavior of the1989Loma Prieta,California,earthquake[J].Geophy ReshLett,17(8):1199-1202.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心