郑州老鸦陈断裂的探测与活动性调查研究

英文篇名：Exploration of the Laoyachen fault,Zhengzhou of China,and its activity investigation
中文刊名：地震学报
英文刊名：Acta Seismologica Sinica
作者：郝凯 ; 田勤俭 ; 刘保金 ; 尹功名
英文作者：Hao Kai1) ; Tian Qinjian1) Liu Baojin2) Yin Gongming3)1) Institute of Earthquake Science ; China Earthquake Administration ; Beijing 100036 ; China 2) Geophysical Exploration Center ; China Earthquake Administration ; Zhengzhou 450002 ; China3) Institute of Geology ; China Earthquake Administration ; Beijing 100029 ; China
中文关键词：老鸦陈断裂 ; 断层活动性 ; 浅层地震勘探 ; 钻探 ; 地貌调查
英文关键词：Laoyachen fault ; fault activity ; shallow seismic exploration ; drilling ; geomorphologic survey
出版日期：2008-07-15
机构：中国地震局地震预测研究所;中国地震局地球物理勘探中心;中国地震局地质研究所;
年：2008
期：04
出版单位：地震学报

摘要

通过浅层地震勘探、钻孔联合剖面分析、野外地貌调查以及新地质年代测定等技术方法,对原先认定的郑州老鸦陈断裂的活动性开展调查.其中,浅层地震勘探结果表明,该断裂仅存在于新近纪以前的地层,而在新近纪地层内均未发现该断层错断和活动迹象.同时,地表的地质地貌调查亦发现"地貌陡坎"与老鸦陈断裂的位置不一致.另外钻探和钻孔联合剖面的分析也表明,地表的陡坎仅发育在马兰黄土中,其下地层平缓,没有错断现象,认为该陡坎的形成与老鸦陈断层没有关系,但可能与黄河改道变迁的侵蚀作用有关.因此,老鸦陈断裂不属于活动断裂.
Activity of the Laoyachen fault, which was previously recognized as an active fault, is investigated by means of shallow seismic exploration, borehole composite profile analysis, geomorphologic survey and geological dating. The seismic exploration result indicates that this fault only appears in the strata before Neogene, while it has not cut through the Neogene strata themselves. The surface geological and geomorphologic survey show that the position of so-called "fault scarp" is not consistent with the outcrop of the Laoyachen fault. Moreover, the result of drilling and borehole composite profile analysis denotes that the scarp only grew in the Malan Loess, and the strata below kept gentle without offsetting. We think that the formation of this scarp may be associated with the course change of the Yellow River, rather than being related to the motion of the Laoyachen fault. Therefore, the Laoyachen fault is not an active fault.

引文

①郑州市地震局.1993.郑州市区老鸦陈隐伏断裂综合研究报告.
    ②中国地震局地质研究所.2003.黄河、新乡—商丘、老鸦陈隐伏断裂活动性探测报告.
    ①郑州市地震局.1993.郑州市区老鸦陈隐伏断裂综合研究报告.
    ①郑州市地震局.1993.郑州市区老鸦陈隐伏断裂综合研究报告.
    邓起东,徐锡伟,张先康,王广才.2003.城市活动断裂探测的方法和技术[J].地学前缘,10(1):93--103.
    侯清卫,吴怡.2000.老鸦陈断层的地质特征及活动性[J].华南地震,20(3):71--75.
    刘保金,赵成斌,田勤俭,刘尧兴,鄷少英.2007.浅层地震勘探揭示的郑州老鸦陈断层特征[J].地震灾害防御技术,2(3):221--229.
    刘尧兴.2001.豫北地区新构造活动特征及中长期地震预报研究[M].西安:西安地图出版社:15--26.
    夏东兴,吴桑云,郁彰.1993.末次冰期以来黄河变迁[J].海洋地质与第四纪地质,13(2):83--88.
    赵成斌,李德庆,赵景尧,袁洪克,孙振国.2007.郑州东区浅部断层的构造特征研究[J].中国地震,23(1):65--73.
    Fuis G S.1998.West margin of North America-a synthesis of recent seismic transects[J].Tectonophysics,288:265--292.
    Fuis G S,Ryberg T,Godfreg NJ,Okaya D A,Murphy J M.2001.Crustal structure andtectonics fromthe Los AngelesBasin to the Mojave Desert,Southern California[J].Geology,29(1):15--18.
    Miyata T,Maeda Y.1998.Ground damages in the urban area of Kobe at the1995Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake[J].Memoirs ofthe Geological Society of Japan,51:89--101.
    Yeats R S,Sieh K,Allen C R.1997.The Geology of Earthquakes[M].New York and Oxford:Oxford UniversityPress:473--485.