中央扣对大跨度悬索桥地震响应影响及机理研究
|
摘要
为研究不同形式中央扣对悬索桥地震响应影响规律及机理,本文结合某三跨铁路悬索桥,基于ANSYS有限元分析软件建立三维空间有限元分析模型,对比分析不同中央扣设置形式对桥梁自振特性的影响。通过非线性时程分析,对在塔梁位置设置纵向黏滞液体阻尼器前后不同形式中央扣对悬索桥地震响应的影响规律进行研究。通过响应控制振型的研究,揭示中央扣对各响应产生不同影响的机理。研究结果表明:仅通过自振特性分析不能直接得到准确的中央扣对桥梁地震响应影响规律;不同中央扣设置形式下,主梁竖向位移及各项内力响应均大幅增加,塔底弯矩、剪力有所减小,以刚性中央扣为最优;考虑阻尼器后,不同形式中央扣对大跨度悬索桥地震响应的影响与无阻尼器情况基本一致,其原因是设置阻尼器并未改变桥梁各响应的控制振型。
To study the effects of different forms of central buckles on seismic responses of suspension bridges and their mechanism,depending on a three-span railway suspension bridge,this paper established the three-dimensional space finite element analysis model based on finite element software ANSYS,to perform the comparative analysis of the effects of different forms of central buckles on self-vibration behavior of the bridge.Non-linear time-history analysis was conducted to study the effects of different forms of central buckles on seismic responses of the bridge before and after the longitudinal fluid viscous dampers were installed at the tower beams.The study of response control vibration mode revealed the mechanism of the influence of different forms of central buckles on seismic responses.The results showed that:exact influence of central buckle on seismic response on the bridge can not be derived directly through self-vibration behavior analysis alone.Under different forms of central buckles,the girder vertical displacement and internal force responses increased greatly while the bending moment and shear forces in the bottom of the tower decreased,with rigid central buckle being optimal in this research.With damper being considered,the effect of different forms of central buckles on the seismic response of the long span suspension bridge with and without dampers remains the same as the establishment of dampers did not change the response control vibration mode of the bridge.
To study the effects of different forms of central buckles on seismic responses of suspension bridges and their mechanism,depending on a three-span railway suspension bridge,this paper established the three-dimensional space finite element analysis model based on finite element software ANSYS,to perform the comparative analysis of the effects of different forms of central buckles on self-vibration behavior of the bridge.Non-linear time-history analysis was conducted to study the effects of different forms of central buckles on seismic responses of the bridge before and after the longitudinal fluid viscous dampers were installed at the tower beams.The study of response control vibration mode revealed the mechanism of the influence of different forms of central buckles on seismic responses.The results showed that:exact influence of central buckle on seismic response on the bridge can not be derived directly through self-vibration behavior analysis alone.Under different forms of central buckles,the girder vertical displacement and internal force responses increased greatly while the bending moment and shear forces in the bottom of the tower decreased,with rigid central buckle being optimal in this research.With damper being considered,the effect of different forms of central buckles on the seismic response of the long span suspension bridge with and without dampers remains the same as the establishment of dampers did not change the response control vibration mode of the bridge.
引文
[1]GIMSING N J.Cable Supported Bridges[M].2th ed.England:John Wiley&Sons,1997.
[2]VIOLA J M,SYED S,CLENANCE J.The New Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge:Construction Support and Engineering[C]//Proceedings of the 2005 Structures Congress and the 2005 Forensic Engineering Symposium.New York:Structure Engineering Institute of ASCE,2005:1-12.
[3]严国敏.现代悬索桥[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2004.
[4]徐勋,强士中.中央扣对大跨悬索桥动力特性和地震响应的影响研究[J].铁道学报,2010,32(4):84-91.XU Xun,QIANG Shi-zhong.Influence of Central Buckle on Dynamic Behavior and Seismic Response of Long-span Suspension Bridge[J].Journal of the China Railway Society,2010,32(4):84-91.
[5]徐勋,任伟平,强士中.影响大跨悬索桥地震响应的敏感因素[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,36(11):108-113.XU Xun,REN Wei-ping,QIANG Shi-zhong.Sensitive Factors to Influence Seismic Response of Long-span Suspension Bridge[J].Journal of South China University of Technology:Natural Science Edition,2008,36(11):108-113.
[6]刘杰.超大跨悬索桥抗震性能研究[D].西安:长安大学,2012.
[7]焦常科,李爱群,王浩,等.中央扣对三塔悬索桥地震反应的影响[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2010,40(1):160-164.JIAO Chang-ke.LI Ai-qun,WANG Hao.et al.Influence of Central Buckle on Seismic Response of Triple-tower Suspension Bridge[J].Journal of Southeast University:Natural Science Edition,2010,40(1):160-164.
[8]徐斌.三塔悬索桥地震反应研究[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2011.
[9]戎华钦.星海湾大桥地震响应分析及减震措施研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2011.
[10]陈永祁.桥梁工程液体黏滞阻尼器设计与施工[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2012.
[11]卢桂臣,胡雷挺.西堠门大桥液体黏滞阻尼器参数分析[J].世界桥梁,2005,(2):43-45.LU Gui-chen,HU Lei-ting.Analysis of Parametric Sensitivity of Fluid Viscous Dampers for Xihoumen Bridge[J].World Bridges,2005,(2).43-45.
[12]宋旭明,戴公连,曾庆元.自锚式悬索桥地震响应及减震控制分析[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,40(4):1079-1085.SONG Xu-ming,DAI Gong-lian,ZENG Qing-yuan.Seismic Response Analysis and Control of Self-anchored Suspension Bridge[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2009,40(4).1079-1085.
[2]VIOLA J M,SYED S,CLENANCE J.The New Tacoma Narrows Suspension Bridge:Construction Support and Engineering[C]//Proceedings of the 2005 Structures Congress and the 2005 Forensic Engineering Symposium.New York:Structure Engineering Institute of ASCE,2005:1-12.
[3]严国敏.现代悬索桥[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2004.
[4]徐勋,强士中.中央扣对大跨悬索桥动力特性和地震响应的影响研究[J].铁道学报,2010,32(4):84-91.XU Xun,QIANG Shi-zhong.Influence of Central Buckle on Dynamic Behavior and Seismic Response of Long-span Suspension Bridge[J].Journal of the China Railway Society,2010,32(4):84-91.
[5]徐勋,任伟平,强士中.影响大跨悬索桥地震响应的敏感因素[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2008,36(11):108-113.XU Xun,REN Wei-ping,QIANG Shi-zhong.Sensitive Factors to Influence Seismic Response of Long-span Suspension Bridge[J].Journal of South China University of Technology:Natural Science Edition,2008,36(11):108-113.
[6]刘杰.超大跨悬索桥抗震性能研究[D].西安:长安大学,2012.
[7]焦常科,李爱群,王浩,等.中央扣对三塔悬索桥地震反应的影响[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2010,40(1):160-164.JIAO Chang-ke.LI Ai-qun,WANG Hao.et al.Influence of Central Buckle on Seismic Response of Triple-tower Suspension Bridge[J].Journal of Southeast University:Natural Science Edition,2010,40(1):160-164.
[8]徐斌.三塔悬索桥地震反应研究[D].合肥:合肥工业大学,2011.
[9]戎华钦.星海湾大桥地震响应分析及减震措施研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2011.
[10]陈永祁.桥梁工程液体黏滞阻尼器设计与施工[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2012.
[11]卢桂臣,胡雷挺.西堠门大桥液体黏滞阻尼器参数分析[J].世界桥梁,2005,(2):43-45.LU Gui-chen,HU Lei-ting.Analysis of Parametric Sensitivity of Fluid Viscous Dampers for Xihoumen Bridge[J].World Bridges,2005,(2).43-45.
[12]宋旭明,戴公连,曾庆元.自锚式悬索桥地震响应及减震控制分析[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2009,40(4):1079-1085.SONG Xu-ming,DAI Gong-lian,ZENG Qing-yuan.Seismic Response Analysis and Control of Self-anchored Suspension Bridge[J].Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology,2009,40(4).1079-1085.
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心