行波输入下大跨斜拉桥减震控制分析
|
摘要
为了研究行波效应对斜拉桥减震控制效果的影响,以一座大跨斜拉桥为例,建立其有限元模型,计算分析其主动控制、半主动控制和被动控制对飘浮体系斜拉桥的减震效果,并计算了行波输入下斜拉桥的地震反应。半主动控制和被动控制对该斜拉桥的大部分地震反应均能取得良好的控制效果,但是使得桥梁塔底剪力等部分地震反应增大;不同频谱成分的地震动输入显著影响斜拉桥的地震反应和控制方法的减震效果。考虑行波效应后,半主动控制对于该斜拉桥整体地震反应的控制效果优于始终提供最大阻尼力的被动控制;行波效应对斜拉桥主梁具有不利影响,但对桥塔抗震有利,并且对三种控制方法的减震效果没有明显的不利影响。
In order to study the influence of traveling wave effect on control effectiveness of seismic mitigation for cable-stayed bridge,the vibration-suppressed effectiveness of active control,semi-active control and passive control for a long-span floating cable-stayed bridge is calculated and analyzed with its finite element model.The seismic responses of cable-stayed bridge under traveling wave input are calculated.Semi-active control and passive control can get good control efficiency for the most seismic responses of the cable-stayed bridge,but they can make some seismic responses including bottom shearing force of the bridge tower lager.The seismic inputs with different frequency spectrums can evidently influence seismic responses of the cable-bridge and vibration-suppressed effectiveness of the control methods.Semi-active control is better than passive control with most damping force all along for vibration-suppressed effectiveness of the integer seismic responses after considering the traveling wave effect.Traveling wave effect can make bad influence on the beam of cable-bridge,but can be propitious to bridge tower.Bad influence of traveling wave effect on vibration-suppressed effectiveness of the three control methods is not remarkable.
In order to study the influence of traveling wave effect on control effectiveness of seismic mitigation for cable-stayed bridge,the vibration-suppressed effectiveness of active control,semi-active control and passive control for a long-span floating cable-stayed bridge is calculated and analyzed with its finite element model.The seismic responses of cable-stayed bridge under traveling wave input are calculated.Semi-active control and passive control can get good control efficiency for the most seismic responses of the cable-stayed bridge,but they can make some seismic responses including bottom shearing force of the bridge tower lager.The seismic inputs with different frequency spectrums can evidently influence seismic responses of the cable-bridge and vibration-suppressed effectiveness of the control methods.Semi-active control is better than passive control with most damping force all along for vibration-suppressed effectiveness of the integer seismic responses after considering the traveling wave effect.Traveling wave effect can make bad influence on the beam of cable-bridge,but can be propitious to bridge tower.Bad influence of traveling wave effect on vibration-suppressed effectiveness of the three control methods is not remarkable.
引文
[1]欧进萍.结构振动控制———主动、半主动和智能控制[M].北京:科学出版社,2003
[2]范立础.桥梁抗震[M].上海:同济大学出版社,1997
[3]胡聿贤.地震工程学[M].上海:地震出版社,1988
[4]刘士林,梁智涛,候金龙,孟凡超.斜拉桥[M].上海:人民交通出版社,2002
[5]李忠献,黄健,丁阳,史志利.不同地震激励下大跨度斜拉桥的地震反应分析[J].中国公路学报,2005,18(3):48~53
[6]史志利.大跨度桥梁多点激励地震反应分析与MR阻尼器控制[D].天津:天津大学,2003
[7]王成博,史志利,李忠献.大跨度斜拉桥地震反应MR阻尼器半主动控制[J].天津大学学报,2005,38(2):95~101
[8]周国良.高墩及大跨度桥梁的地震反应特性研究[D].北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所,2004
[9]亓兴军.桥梁减震半主动控制研究[D].北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所,2006
[2]范立础.桥梁抗震[M].上海:同济大学出版社,1997
[3]胡聿贤.地震工程学[M].上海:地震出版社,1988
[4]刘士林,梁智涛,候金龙,孟凡超.斜拉桥[M].上海:人民交通出版社,2002
[5]李忠献,黄健,丁阳,史志利.不同地震激励下大跨度斜拉桥的地震反应分析[J].中国公路学报,2005,18(3):48~53
[6]史志利.大跨度桥梁多点激励地震反应分析与MR阻尼器控制[D].天津:天津大学,2003
[7]王成博,史志利,李忠献.大跨度斜拉桥地震反应MR阻尼器半主动控制[J].天津大学学报,2005,38(2):95~101
[8]周国良.高墩及大跨度桥梁的地震反应特性研究[D].北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所,2004
[9]亓兴军.桥梁减震半主动控制研究[D].北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所,2006
版权所有：© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心