陕西汉中盆地水压致裂地应力测量分析研究
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
汉中盆地位于龙门山断裂带东北段的末端,汶川MS8.0地震发生以后,地震活动存在沿龙门山断裂带向NE向发展的趋势.在汉中盆地西缘进行了两个钻孔的水压致裂地应力测量,来分析震后该区地应力状态,以期为该区的地震危险性研究提供实际资料.这两个钻孔深度均为300m左右,相距33m,取得了较好的地应力测试结果.通过对地应力测试结果的综合分析研究,得到以下认识:①在汉中盆地西缘300m深度地层内,最大水平主应力值为5.69—19.52MPa,最小水平主应力值为3.81—10.90 MPa,垂直主应力值约为1.25—7.03MPa,水平主应力占主导地位,垂直应力为最小应力,该地应力状态有利于逆断层的活动;②汉中盆地西部现今最大水平主应力方向为WNW或近EW向;③汶川地震后,目前汉中盆地及其西部地区仍处于构造应力调整阶段,总体相对稳定.
Hanzhong basin is located at the end of northeastern section of Longmenshan fault zone.After the Wenchuan MS8.0earthquake,the earthquakes tend to occur mainly in the northeastern section of the Longmenshan fault and migrate towards NE direction.In order to study the stress state after the mainshock and analyze the seismic risk in Hanzhong basin region,two drillings were arranged to conduct hydrofracturing in-situ stress measurement on the western margin of Hanzhong basin.Both drillings have a depth of 300m,the distance between the two drillings is 33m.The results of stress measurement are perfect.Based on a comprehensive analysis of the stress measurement results,the following conclusions are drawn:① On western margin of Hanzhong basin within 300mdepth,the maximum horizontal principal stress is 5.69—19.52MPa,the minimum horizontal principal stress is 3.81—10.90 MPa,and the vertical principal stress is 1.25—7.03 MPa.The horizontal principal stress plays a dominant role and the minimum principal stress is vertical.The stress state is in favor of thrust fault movement.② The present maximum horizontal principal stress in Hanzhong basin is in WNW--ESE orientation or in EW.③ Since the occurrence of Wenchuan MS8.0earthquake,the tectonic stress in Hanzhong basin and its western neighbour region has been in an adjustment phase and being stable generally.
引文
安其美,丁立丰,王海忠,赵仕广.2004.龙门山断裂带的性质与活动性研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,24(2):115--119.
    陈立春,陈杰,刘进峰,李峰,杨晓平,冉勇康.2008.龙门山前山断裂北段晚第四纪活动性研究[J].地震地质,30(3):710 --722.
    陈群策,安其美,孙东生,杜建军,毛吉震,丰成君.2010.山西盆地现今地应力状态与地震危险性分析[J].地球学报,31 (4):541--548.
    邓起东,陈社发,赵小麟.1994.龙门山及邻区的构造和地震活动及动力学[J].地震地质,16(4):389--403.
    董树文,李廷栋,高锐,吕庆田,吴珍汉,陈宣华,周琦,刘刚,刘志强,梅琳.2010.地球深部探测国际发展与我国现状综述[J].地质学报,84(6):743--769.
    樊春,王二七,王刚,王世峰.2008.龙门山断裂带北段晚新近纪以来的右行走滑运动及其构造变换研究:以青川断裂为例[J].地质科学,43(3):417--433.
    郭啟良,王成虎,马洪生,王崇良.2009.汶川MS
    8 .0级大震前后的水压致裂原地应力测量[J].地球物理学报,52(5):1--7.
    李方全,孙世宗,李立球.1982.华北及郯庐断裂带地应力测量[J].岩石力学与工程学报,1(1):73--86.
    李方全.1994.断层活动与原地应力状态[M]∥中国地震学会地震地质专业委员会编.中国活动断层研究.北京:地震出版社:15--21.
    李方全.2010.1976年唐山大震的地应力测量[J].地壳构造与地壳应力,(1):34--36.
    龙思胜,赵珠.2000.鲜水河、龙门山和安宁河三大断裂交汇地区震源应力场特征[J].地震学报,22(5):547--464.
    彭华,马秀敏,姜景捷.2009.龙门山北端青川断层附近应力测量与断层稳定性[J].地质力学学报,15(2):114--130.
    吴满路,张岳桥,廖椿庭,陈群策,马寅生,吴金生,严君凤,区明益.2010.汶川地震后沿龙门山断裂带原地应力测量初步结果[J].地质学报,84(9):1292--1299.
    谢富仁,陈群策,崔效锋,李宏,杨树新,郭启良,陈连旺,许忠淮,张彦山,窦淑芹,赵建涛,张周术,刘长义,王刚军.2007.中国大陆地壳应力环境基础数据库[J].地球物理学进展,22(1):131--136.
    杨晓平,冯希杰,戈天勇,宋方敏,师亚芹,刘玉法.2008.龙门山断裂带北段第四纪活动的地质地貌证据[J].地震地质,30(3):644--657.
    张伯崇.1996.孔隙压力、断层滑动准则和水库蓄水的影响[M]∥苏恺之,李方全,张伯崇,王建军编.长江三峡坝区地壳应力与孔隙水压力综合研究.北京:地震出版社:166--198.
    张春生,刘春,石军,张宪.2004.汉中与安康盆地地震活动特征[J].华北地震科学,22(2):18--22.
    张致伟,程万正,阮祥,吴朋.2009.汶川8.0级地震前龙门山断裂带的地震活动性和构造应力场特征[J].地震学报,31 (2):117--127.
    中国地震局震害防御司.1999.中国近代地震目录[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社:211--212.
    Byerlee J D.1978.Friction of rocks[J].Pure Appl Geophys,116(4/5):615--626.
    Haimson B C,Cornet F H.2003.ISRM suggested methods for rock stress estimation--Part 3:Hydraulic fracturing(HF)and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures(HTPF)[J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,40(7/8):1011--1020.
    Zoback M D,Healy J H.1992.In-situ stress measurements to 3.5km depth in the cajon pass scientific research borehole:Implications for the mechanics of crustal faulting[J].J Geophys Res,97(B4):5039--5057.
    ①陕西省地震队分析组汇编.1973.陕西省地震目录(公元前1177年—公元1972年):42.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心