多网重力数据联合平差和系统误差改正

英文篇名：Combined Adjustment and Systematic Error Correction of Multi-network Repeated Gravity Observations
中文刊名：地震
英文刊名：Earthquake
作者：李真 ; 陈石 ; 秦建增 ; 卢红艳 ; 徐伟民
英文作者：LI Zhen1 ; CHEN Shi2 ; QIN Jian-zeng1 ; LU Hong-yan2 ; XU Wei-min2(1.Geophysical Exploration Center ; CEA ; Zhengzhou 450002 ; China ; 2.Institute of Geophysics ; CEA ; Beijing 100081 ; China)
中文关键词：重力监测网 ; 联合平差 ; 重力基准 ; 系统误差
英文关键词：Gravity network ; Combined adjustment ; Gravity datum ; Systematic error
出版日期：2012-04-15
机构：中国地震局地球物理勘探中心;中国地震局地球物理研究所;
年：2012
期：02
出版单位：地震

摘要

华北地区现行的地震重力监测网由于独立联测,自成体系,绝对控制点较少,获得的重力场动态变化图像在绝对控制较弱的地区会产生畸变,也不能有效的消除仪器标定系统所引起的测量误差。本文以华北大网作为控制网,结合绝对重力点进行联合平差计算,使各省区地震重力监测网平差精度提高了(0～4)×10-8 m/s2,平差起算基准相统一,绝对控制较弱的地区畸变减小。采用相关系数检验法,对华北地区各省区地震重力监测网2010年二期重力平差计算结果进行检验,部分重力点位系统误差高达60×10-8 m/s2,经过系统误差改正后,重力场动态变化趋于一致。经过各项改正后,华北地区2010年重力场动态差分图像对地震前兆具有更好的反映。
There are nine repeated relative gravity observation networks in northern China.whose Measurements of these networks are carried out independently and they have different control points and data processing methods.Gravity value changes far away from the control points are always imprecise and contain systematic error.In this paper,we use absolute gravity points and The Large North China Gravity Network as control gravity network,and calculate combined adjustment of the nine repeated relative gravity networks.The precision of the repeated relative gravity observation networks increased by 0~4×10-8 m/s2 and the nine repeated relative gravity observation networks can be united as a whole gravity network.Systematic error of some relative gravity observation networks can reach 60×10-8 m/s2.We also calculated reliability of correlation coefficients of relative gravity observation networks and made systematic error correction.After the systematic error correction,it is expected that repeated gravity data can better response to earthquake preparation.At last,we analysed the changes of gravity field of 2010 in northern China.

引文

[1]祝意青,梁伟锋.中国大陆重力场变化及其引起的地球动力学特征[J].武汉大学学报.信息科学版,2007,32(3):246-249.
    [2]Hunt T M.Gravity variations associated with the 1968Inangahua earthquake[J].J Geol Geophys,1970,13(4):1 050-1 051.
    [3]申重阳,李辉.研究现今地壳运动和强震机理的一种方法[J].地球物理学进展,2007,22(1):49-56.
    [4]Groten E.Methods and experiences of high precision gravimetry as a tool for crustal movement de-tection[J].Geodynamics,1995,(19):141-157.
    [5]Valliant H D.The LaCoste and Romberg AirPSea Gravity Meter:An Overview[M].CRC Hand-book of Geophysical Exploration at Sea,2nd edition,1991.
    [6]李辉,徐如刚,申重阳,等.大华北地震动态重力监测网分形特征研究[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2010,30(5):16-18.
    [7]玄松柏,刑乐林.国内绝对重力实验观测比对[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2008,28(4):72-74.
    [8]李瑞浩,黄建梁,李辉,等.唐山地震前后区域重力场变化机制[J].地震学报,1997,19(4):399-407.
    [9]申重阳,李辉.丽江7.0级地震重力前兆模式研究[J].地震学报,2003,25(2):163-171.
    [10]祝意青,徐云马.龙门山断裂带重力变化与汶川8.0级地震关系研究[J].地球物理学报,2009,52(10):2 538-2 546.
    [11]王辉,曹建玲.华北地区的背景地震活动及区域未来强震危险性[J].地震,2011,31(2):11-23.
    [12]张跃刚,胡新康.华北地区块体及其边界的相对运动[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2005,25(1):47-50.
    [13]国家地震局制定.地震重力测量规范[R].北京:地震出版社,1997.90-91.
    [14]郝洪涛,李辉.基于重力差方法检测重力仪一次项系数变化[J].大地测量与地球动力学,2011,31(2):87-90.
    [15]卢红艳,郑金涵.利用实测资料确定LCR重力仪的线性格值和周期误差参数[J].地震地磁观测与研究,2004,25(4):20-25.
    [16]张树宝,王绍丽.强烈破坏性构造地震的成因及预报[J].河北地质,2011,(1):32-36.