反应位移法在明挖地铁车站抗震计算中的应用
详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文
摘要
为研究不同计算模型的精确度及实用性,针对不同的反应位移法模型,以某明挖地铁车站为例,在不同地震作用下进行ANSYS建模计算,并与时程分析法计算结果进行对比分析,总结不同模型对结构内力的影响。发现反应位移法比经典反应位移法计算复杂,结果偏差较大;强制反应位移法计算量最小,但在地震作用较大时精度较低;整体反应位移法精度高、计算量小,用于明挖地铁车站的抗震设计可以提高工作效率和计算精度。
To study the accuracy and practicability of different calculation models for response displacement method, by taking an example of open-cut metro station construction, ANSYS modeling calculations were performed under the conditions of different earthquakes and the results were compared with the results of time history analysis method. The influences of different models on the internal forces of the structure were summarized. It was found that the reaction displacement method and the classic response displacement method are both more complicated than other methods, and their results ' deviations are also bigger; forced response displacement method has minimum calculation among al these models, but its accuracy is very low in large earthquakes; integral response deformation method has high precision and small amount of calculation, and it can improve the work efficiency and accuracy when used in the metro stations constructed by cut and cover method.
引文
[1]郑永来,杨林德.地下结构抗震[M].上海.同济大学出版社,2005.
    [2]李亮,杨晓慧,杜修力.地下结构地震反应计算的改进的反应位移法[J].岩土工程学报,2014(7):31-36.
    [3]刘晶波,王文晖,赵冬冬.地下结构抗震分析的整体式反应位移法[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(8):1618-1624.
    [4]陶连金,王文沛,张波.地铁地下结构抗震设计方法差异性规律研究[J].土木工程学报,2012,45(12):1 7 0-1 7 6.
    [5]黄先锋.地下结构的抗震计算:位移响应法[J].铁道建筑,1999(6):3-6.
    [6]刘晶波,王文晖,赵冬冬.地下结构地震反应计算反应位移法的改进[J].土木建筑与环境工程,2010,32(S2):211-213.
    [7]杜兴华.地铁车站水平地震动力响应分析[J].铁道工程学报,2013(6):103-108.
    [8]刘晶波,王文晖,张小波.地下结构横断面地震反应分析的反应位移法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(1):161-167.
    [9]GB 50011—2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
    [10]郝志宏,叶英华,刘运亮.基于ANSYS的北京某明挖地铁车站抗震分析[J].工业建筑,2009,39(S):752-758.
    [11]陈飞.地铁车站地震响应有限元分析[D].湖北:三峡大学,2011.

版权所有:© 2023 中国地质图书馆 中国地质调查局地学文献中心