A cross-sectional study was conducted including 62 patients with ChD who were separated into two groups according to ICD implantation status. Group 0 consisted of 34 patients with ChD without ICDs, and group 1 comprised 28 patients with ICDs. Complete echocardiographic studies, including GLS and MD measurements, were performed in all patients.
Chamber dimensions, ejection fraction, and diastolic function showed no significant differences between patients with and those without ICDs. GLS was reduced in patients with ChD with ICDs compared with those without (P = .02). By receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, GLS identified patients with ChD with ICDs with sensitivity of 67% and specificity of 69%. MD was more pronounced in patients with ChD with ICDs compared with those without (P < .001), with a C statistic of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71–0.91). MD > 57 msec detected ICD presence with sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 71% and was superior to GLS and ejection fraction (P < .05). In multivariate analysis, New York Heart Association functional class (odds ratio, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.09–8.39; P = .03), MD (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.04–1.19; P = .001), and GLS (odds ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.54–0.96; P = .026) were significant and independently associated with malignant arrhythmic events.
GLS and MD may add important information in the risk stratification of patients with ChD. The use of MD by strain echocardiography could be an attractive tool in the decision making for ICD placement as primary prevention for sudden cardiac death in patients with ChD.