Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Guixiang Liao (4)
  Zhihong Zhao (5)
  Shuhui Lin (4)
  Rong Li (4)
  Yawei Yuan (4)
  Shasha Du (4)
  Jiarong Chen (4)
  Haijun Deng (6)
  
  4. Department of Radiation Oncology ; Nanfang Hospital ; Southern Medical University ; No. 1838 ; Guangzhou Avenue North ; Guangzhou ; 510515 ; China
  5. Institute of Nephrology and Urology ; Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University ; Guangzhou ; 510630 ; China
  6. Department of General Surgery ; Nanfang Hospital ; Southern Medical University ; No. 1838 ; Guangzhou Avenue North ; Guangzhou ; 510515 ; China
  
• 关键词：Colorectal ; Robotic ; Laparoscopic ; Meta ; analysis ; Colorectal cancer
• 刊名：World Journal of Surgical Oncology
• 出版年：2014
• 出版时间：December 2014
• 年：2014
• 卷：12
• 期：1
• 全文大小：863 KB
• 参考文献：1. Jacobs, M, Verdeja, JC, Goldstein, HS (1991) Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1: pp. 144-150
  2. Weber, PA, Merola, S, Wasielewski, A, Ballantyne, GH (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45: pp. 1689-1694 CrossRef
  3. Delaney, CP, Lynch, AC, Senagore, AJ, Fazio, VW (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46: pp. 1633-1639 CrossRef
  4. D'Annibale, A, Morpurgo, E, Fiscon, V, Trevisan, P, Sovernigo, G, Orsini, C, Guidolin, D (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47: pp. 2162-2168 CrossRef
  5. D'Annibale, A, Pernazza, G, Morpurgo, E, Monsellato, I, Pende, V, Lucandri, G, Termini, B, Orsini, C, Sovernigo, G (2010) Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol 17: pp. 2856-2862 CrossRef
  6. Park, JS, Choi, GS, Lim, KH, Jang, YS, Jun, SH (2010) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for low rectal cancer: case-matched analysis of short-term outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 17: pp. 3195-3202 CrossRef
  7. Baik, SH, Kwon, HY, Kim, JS, Hur, H, Sohn, SK, Cho, CH, Kim, H (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16: pp. 1480-1487 CrossRef
  8. Kim, JY, Kim, NK, Lee, KY, Hur, H, Min, BS, Kim, JH (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19: pp. 2485-2493 CrossRef
  9. Bianchi, PP, Ceriani, C, Locatelli, A, Spinoglio, G, Zampino, MG, Sonzogni, A, Crosta, C, Andreoni, B (2010) Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 24: pp. 2888-2894 CrossRef
  10. Rawlings, AL, Woodland, JH, Vegunta, RK, Crawford, DL (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21: pp. 1701-1708 CrossRef
  11. Jimenez-Rodriguez, RM, Diaz-Pavon, JM, de la Portilla, DJF, Prendes-Sillero, E, Dussort, HC, Padillo, J (2013) Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 28: pp. 815-821 CrossRef
  12. Higgins, JP, Altman, DG, Gotzsche, PC, Juni, P, Moher, D, Oxman, AD, Savovic, J, Schulz, KF, Weeks, L, Sterne, JA (2011) The Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343: pp. d5928 CrossRef
  13. Park, JS, Choi, GS, Park, SY, Kim, HJ, Ryuk, JP (2012) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg 99: pp. 1219-1226 CrossRef
  14. Patriti, A, Ceccarelli, G, Bartoli, A, Spaziani, A, Biancafarina, A, Casciola, L (2009) Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS 13: pp. 176-183
  15. Baik, SH, Ko, YT, Kang, CM, Lee, WJ, Kim, NK, Sohn, SK, Chi, HS, Cho, CH (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial. Surg Endosc 22: pp. 1601-1608 CrossRef
  16. Jimenez, RR, Diaz, PJ, de La Portilla, DJF, Prendes, SE, Hisnard, CDJ, Padillo, J (2011) Prospective randomised study: robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection. Cir Esp 89: pp. 432-438 CrossRef
  17. Ma, Y, Yang, Z, Qin, H, Wang, Y (2011) A meta-analysis of laparoscopy compared with open colorectal resection for colorectal cancer. Med Oncol 28: pp. 925-933 CrossRef
  18. Abraham, NS, Young, JM, Solomon, MJ (2004) Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91: pp. 1111-1124 CrossRef
  19. Buunen, M, Veldkamp, R, Hop, WC, Kuhry, E, Jeekel, J, Haglind, E, Pahlman, L, Cuesta, MA, Msika, S, Morino, M, Lacy, A, Bonjer, HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10: pp. 44-52 CrossRef
  20. Guillou, PJ, Quirke, P, Thorpe, H, Walker, J, Jayne, DG, Smith, AM, Heath, RM, Brown, JM (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365: pp. 1718-1726 CrossRef
  21. Challacombe, B, Wheatstone, S (2010) Telementoring and telerobotics in urological surgery. Curr Urol Rep 11: pp. 22-28 CrossRef
  22. Liao, G, Chen, J, Ren, C, Li, R, Du, S, Xie, G, Deng, H, Yang, K, Yuan, Y (2013) Robotic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 8: pp. e81946 CrossRef
  23. Scandola, M, Grespan, L, Vicentini, M, Fiorini, P (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy vs traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy: five metaanalyses. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 18: pp. 705-715 CrossRef
  24. Maeso, S, Reza, M, Mayol, JA, Blasco, JA, Guerra, M, Andradas, E, Plana, MN (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252: pp. 254-262 CrossRef
  25. Yang, Y, Wang, F, Zhang, P, Shi, C, Zou, Y, Qin, H, Ma, Y (2012) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease, focusing on rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19: pp. 3727-3736 CrossRef
  26. Spinoglio, G, Summa, M, Priora, F, Quarati, R, Testa, S (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51: pp. 1627-1632 CrossRef
  27. Deutsch, GB, Sathyanarayana, SA, Gunabushanam, V, Mishra, N, Rubach, E, Zemon, H, Klein, JD, Denoto, GR (2012) Robotic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience. Surg Endosc 26: pp. 956-963 CrossRef
  28. Baek, SJ, Kim, SH, Cho, JS, Shin, JW, Kim, J (2012) Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg 36: pp. 2722-2729 CrossRef
  29. Patel, CB, Ragupathi, M, Ramos-Valadez, DI, Haas, EM (2011) A three-arm (laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and robotic) matched-case analysis of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 54: pp. 144-150 CrossRef
  30. Poon, JT, Law, WL (2009) Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a review. Ann Surg Oncol 16: pp. 3038-3047 CrossRef
  31. Kim, CW, Kim, CH, Baik, SH (2014) Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review. J Gastrointest Surg 18: pp. 816-830 CrossRef
  32. Amato, A, Pescatori, M (2006) Perioperative blood transfusions for the recurrence of colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7: pp. D5033
  33. Morner, ME, Gunnarsson, U, Jestin, P, Svanfeldt, M (2012) The importance of blood loss during colon cancer surgery for long-term survival: an epidemiological study based on a population based register. Ann Surg 255: pp. 1126-1128 CrossRef
  34. Bhangu, A, Brown, G, Akmal, M, Tekkis, P (2012) Outcome of abdominosacral resection for locally advanced primary and recurrent rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99: pp. 1453-1461 CrossRef
  35. McPartland, KJ, Hyman, NH (2003) Damage control: what is its role in colorectal surgery?. Dis Colon Rectum 46: pp. 981-986 CrossRef
  36. Mirnezami, AH, Mirnezami, R, Venkatasubramaniam, AK, Chandrakumaran, K, Cecil, TD, Moran, BJ (2010) Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 12: pp. 1084-1093 CrossRef
  37. Pigazzi, A, Luca, F, Patriti, A, Valvo, M, Ceccarelli, G, Casciola, L, Biffi, R, Garcia-Aguilar, J, Baek, JH (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17: pp. 1614-1620 CrossRef
  38. Keller, DS, Senagore, AJ, Lawrence, JK, Champagne, BJ, Delaney, CP (2014) Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 28: pp. 212-221 CrossRef
  39. DeSouza, AL, Prasad, LM, Park, JJ, Marecik, SJ, Blumetti, J, Abcarian, H (2010) Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role?. Dis Colon Rectum 53: pp. 1000-1006 CrossRef
  40. Halabi, WJ, Kang, CY, Jafari, MD, Nguyen, VQ, Carmichael, JC, Mills, S, Stamos, MJ, Pigazzi, A (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 37: pp. 2782-2790 CrossRef
  41. Aly, EH (2014) Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence. Int J Colorectal Dis 29: pp. 1-8 CrossRef
  
• 刊物主题：Surgical Oncology;
• 出版者：BioMed Central
• ISSN：1477-7819

文摘

Background Robotic-assisted laparoscopy is popularly performed for colorectal disease. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the safety and efficacy of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery (RCS) and laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCS) for colorectal disease based on randomized controlled trial studies. Methods Literature searches of electronic databases (Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were performed to identify randomized controlled trial studies that compared the clinical or oncologic outcomes of RCS and LCS. This meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager (RevMan) software (version 5.2) that is provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. The data used were mean differences and odds ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were adopted according to heterogeneity. Results Four randomized controlled trial studies were identified for this meta-analysis. In total, 110 patients underwent RCS, and 116 patients underwent LCS. The results revealed that estimated blood losses (EBLs), conversion rates and times to the recovery of bowel function were significantly reduced following RCS compared with LCS. There were no significant differences in complication rates, lengths of hospital stays, proximal margins, distal margins or harvested lymph nodes between the two techniques. Conclusions RCS is a promising technique and is a safe and effective alternative to LCS for colorectal surgery. The advantages of RCS include reduced EBLs, lower conversion rates and shorter times to the recovery of bowel function. Further studies are required to define the financial effects of RCS and the effects of RCS on long-term oncologic outcomes.