Near-miss events, risk messages, and decision making
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Robin L. Dillon ; Catherine H. Tinsley
  • 关键词:Near ; misses ; Risk perception ; Hazard warnings ; Natural disasters
  • 刊名:Environment Systems and Decisions
  • 出版年:2016
  • 出版时间:March 2016
  • 年:2016
  • 卷:36
  • 期:1
  • 页码:34-44
  • 全文大小:397 KB
  • 参考文献:Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec 50(2):179–211CrossRef
    Árvai J, Rivers L (2014) Effective risk communication. Earthscan, New York
    Árvai J, Gregory R, Ohlson D, Blackwell B, Gray R (2006) Letdowns, wake-up calls, and constructed preferences: people’s response to fuel and wildfire. J Forest 104(4):173–181
    Baker EJ (1979) Predicting response to hurricane warnings: a reanalysis of data from four studies. Mass Emerg 4:9–24
    Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51(6):1173–1182CrossRef
    Bier VM, Mosleh A (1991) An approach to the analysis of accident precursors. In: Garrick BJ, Gekler WC (eds) The analysis, communication, and perception of risk. Plenum Press, New York, pp 93–104CrossRef
    Birkland T (2006) Lessons of disaster: policy change after catastrophic events. Georgetown University Press, Washington
    Caponecchia C (2010) It won’t happen to me: an investigation of optimism bias in occupational health and safety. J Appl Soc Psychol 40(3):601–617CrossRef
    Devore JL (1987) Probability and statistics for engineering and the sciences, 2nd edn. Wadswach Inc, CA
    Dillon RL, Tinsley CH (2008) How near-misses influence decision making under risk: a missed opportunity for learning. Manage Sci 54(8):1425–1440CrossRef
    Dillon RL, Tinsley CH, Cronin MA (2011) Why near-miss events can decrease an individual’s protective response to hurricanes. Risk Anal 31(3):440–449CrossRef
    Evans J (2010) Intuition and reasoning: a dual-process perspective. Psychol Inq 21:313–326CrossRef
    Fischhoff B (2012) Risk analysis and human behavior. Earthscan, London
    Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D (2002) Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef
    Job RFS, Hamer V, Walker M (1995) The effects of optimism bias and fear on protective behaviours. In: Kenny DT, Job RFS (eds) Australia’s adolescents: a health psychology perspective. University of New England Press, Armidale, pp 151–156
    Judd CM, McClelland GH (1989) Data analysis: a model comparison approach. Harcourt Brace, New York
    Kellon DS, Árvai JL (2011) Five propositions for improving decision-making about the environment in developing communities: insights from the decision sciences. J Environ Manage 92:363–371CrossRef
    Krizan Z, Windschitl PD (2007) The influence of outcome desirability on optimism. Psychol Bull 133:95–121CrossRef
    Kunreuther H, Ginsberg R, Miller L, Sagi P, Slovic P, Borkan B, Katz N (1978) Disaster insurance protection: public policy lessons. Wiley, New York
    Lant TK (1992) Aspiration level adaptation: an empirical exploration. Manag Sci 38:623–644CrossRef
    Lee SHV, Job RFS (1995) The effect of information on optimism bias. In: Kenny DT, Job RFS (eds) Australia’s adolescents: a health psychology perspective. University of New England Press, Armidale, pp 157–163
    Lindell MK, Perry RW (2004) Communicating environmental risk in multiethnic communities. Sage, Thousand Oaks
    March JG, Simon H (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New York
    McGee TK, McFarlane BL, Varghese J (2009) An examination of the influence of hazard experience on wildfire risk perceptions and adoption of mitigation measures. Soc Nat Resour 22:308–323CrossRef
    Middleton W (1996) Give em enough rope: perception of health and safety risks in bungee jumpers. J Soc Clin Psychol 15(1):68–79CrossRef
    Mileti DS, O’Brien PW (1992) Warnings during disaster: normalizing communicated risk. Soc Probl 39:40–57CrossRef
    Radcliffe NM, Klein WMP (2002) Dispositional, unrealistic, and comparative optimism: differential relations with the knowledge and processing of risk information and beliefs about personal risk. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 28(6):836–846CrossRef
    Rosoff H, Cui J, John RS (2013) Heuristics and biases in cyber security dilemmas. Environment Systems & Decisions 3(4):517–529CrossRef
    Ross M, Sicoly F (1979) Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. J Pers Soc Psychol 37:322–336CrossRef
    Scheier M, Carver C, Bridges M (1994) Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life orientation test. J Pers Soc Psychol 67:1063–1078CrossRef
    Sitkin SB, Weingart LR (1995) Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: a test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Acad Manag J 38(6):1573–1592CrossRef
    Slovic P (1995) The construction of preference. Am Psychol 50:364–371CrossRef
    Sobel ME (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociol Methodol 13:290–312CrossRef
    Suls J, Rose JP, Windschitl PD, Smith AR (2013) Optimism following a tornado disaster. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 39(5):691–702CrossRef
    Tierney KJ, Lindell MT, Perry RW (2001) Facing the unexpected: disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Joseph Henry Press/National Academy Press, Washington, DC
    Tinsley CH, Dillon RL, Cronin MA (2012) How near-miss events amplify or attenuate risky decision making. Manage Sci 58(9):1596–1613CrossRef
    Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185:1124–1131CrossRef
    Weinstein ND (1989) Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. Psychol Bull 105(1):31–50CrossRef
    Wilson RS, Árvai JL (2010) Why less is more: exploring affect-based value neglect. J Risk Res 13:399–409CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Robin L. Dillon (1)
    Catherine H. Tinsley (1)

    1. McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
  • 刊物类别:Environment, general; Environmental Management; Sustainable Development; Environmental Engineering/B
  • 刊物主题:Environment, general; Environmental Management; Sustainable Development; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology; Environmental Economics;
  • 出版者:Springer US
  • ISSN:2194-5411
文摘
Decades of research have sought to understand how disaster preparedness decisions are made. We believe one understudied factor is the impact of near-miss events. A near-miss occurs when an event (such as a hurricane or terrorist attack) has some non-trivial probability of ending in disaster (loss of life, property damage), but the negative outcome is avoided largely by chance (e.g., at the last minute, the storm dissipates or the bomb fails to detonate). In the first of two experiments, we study reactions to a hurricane threat when participants are told about prior near-miss events. We find that people with information about a prior near-miss event that has no negative consequences are less likely to take protective measures than those with either no information or information about a prior near-miss event that has salient negative information. Similar results have been shown in prior research, but we seek to understand people’s reasoning for the different reactions. We examine the role of an individual’s risk propensity and general level of optimism as possible explanatory variables for the “near-miss” effect. We find risk propensity to be stable across conditions, whereas general optimism is influenced by the type of prior near-miss information, so that optimism mediates how near-miss information impacts protective decisions. People who experience a potentially hazardous near-miss but escape without obvious cues of damage will feel more optimistic and take less protective action. In the second study, we test messages about the hazard’s risk and examine the impact of these messages to offset the influence of near-misses. We end by discussing the implications of near-misses for risk communication.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700