Global entrepreneurship monitor versus panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics: comparing their intellectual structures

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Antonio Rafael Ramos-Rodríguez…
• 关键词：Entrepreneurship ; GEM ; PSED ; Intellectual structure ; Citation analysis ; Co ; citation analysis
• 刊名：International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：September 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：11
• 期：3
• 页码：571-597
• 全文大小：1,036 KB
• 参考文献：Acs, Z. J., Arenius, P., Hay, M., et al. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2004 executive report. Babson Park: Babson College/London Business School.
  Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving (1st ed.). London: Sage.
  Aldrich, H. E., & Baker, T. (1997). Blinded by the cites? Has there been progress in entrepreneurship research? In D. L. Sexton & R. W. Smilor (Eds.), Entrepreneurship 2000. Chicago: Upstart Publishing.
  Alsos, G. A., & Kolvereid, L. (1998). The business gestation process of novice, serial and parallel business founders. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 22(4), 101-14.
  Alvarez, C., & Urbano, D. (2011). Una década de investigación basada en el GEM: Logros y Retos. Academia Revista Latinoamericana de Investigación, 46, 16-7.
  Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233-47.View Article
  Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). What’s new about the new economy? Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267-15.View Article
  Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive, and destructive. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893-93.View Article
  Bosma, N., & Levie J. (2010). Global entrepreneurship monitor, 2009 executive report. Babson Park, MA, US: Babson College, Santiago, Chile: Universidad del Desarollo and Reykjavík, Iceland: Háskólinn Reykjavík University, London, UK: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
  Bosma, N., Jones, E., Autio, E., & Levie, J. (2008). Global entrepreneurship monitor, 2007 executive report. Wellesley: Babson College.
  Bosma, N., Acs, Z., Autio, E., Coduras, A., & Levie, J. (2009). Global entrepreneurship monitor, 2008 executive report. Babson Park, MA, US: Babson College, Santiago, Chile: Universidad del Desarollo. UK: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
  Bosma, N., Coduras, A., Litovsky, Y., & Seaman, J. (2012). Gem manual. A report on the design, data and quality control of global entrepreneurship monitor. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.
  Busenitz, L., West, G. P., III, Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G. N., & Zacharakis, A. (2003). Entrepreneurship research in emergence: past trends and future directions. Journal of Management, 29(3), 285-08.View Article
  Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., & Penan, H. (1993). Cienciometría. La medición de la actividad científica: de la bibliometría a la vigilancia tecnológica. Gijón: Ediciones Trea, S.L.
  Carree, M., Andre, V. S., Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2002). Economic development and business ownership: an analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976-996. Small Business Economics, 19(3), 271-71.View Article
  Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Reynolds, P. D. (1996). Exploring start-up event sequences. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 151-51.View Article
  Carter, N., Gartnerb, W. B., Shaverc, K. G., & Gatewood, E. J. (2003). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 13-9.View Article
  Cooper, A. C., Gimeno-Gascon, F., & Woo, C. Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 371-71.View Article
  Culnan, M. J., O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1990). Intellectual structure of research in organizational behavior, 1972-984: a co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 453-58.View Article
  Curtin, R., & Reynolds, P. (2007). Panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. History of the research paradigm. http://?www.?psed.?isr.?umich.?edu/?psed/?background . Accessed 01 July 2013.
  Davidsson, P. (2004). Researching entrepreneurship. New York: Springer.
  Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301-01.View Article
  De Rearte, A. G., Lanari, E., & Atucha, P. A. A. J. (1998). El Proceso de Creación de Empresas; Abordaje Metodológico y Primeros Resultados de un Estudio Regional. Argentina: Universidad Nacional Mar de la Plata.
  Delmar, F., & Davidsson, P. (2000). Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12, 1-3.View Article
  Delmar, F., & Scott, S. (2003). Does business planning facilitate the development of new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 24(12), 1165-165.View Article
  Delmar, F., & Scott, S. (2004). Legitimating first: organizing activities and the survival of new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(3), 385-10.View Article
  Déry, R., & Toulouse, J. M. (1996). Social structuration of the field of entrepreneurship: a case study. Canadian Journal of Administrative Science, 13, 285-05.View Article
  Diochon, M., Menzies, T. V., & Gasse, Y. (2007). From becoming to being: measuring fir
• 作者单位：Antonio Rafael Ramos-Rodríguez (1)
  Salustiano Martínez-Fierro (1)
  José Aurelio Medina-Garrido (1)
  José Ruiz-Navarro (1)
  
  1. Department of Management, University of Cádiz, Avda. de la Universidad s/n, 11402 Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain
  
• 刊物主题：Entrepreneurship; Management/Business for Professionals; Emerging Markets/Globalization;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1555-1938

文摘

In the past 15?years, two international observatories have been intensively studying entrepreneurship using empirical studies with different methodologies: Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) and Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics (PSED). Both projects have generated a considerable volume of scientific production, and their intellectual structures are worth analyzing. The current work is an exploratory study of the knowledge base of the articles generated by each of these two observatories and published in prestigious journals. The main difference found is that the predominant theoretical frameworks used are the economic approach and institutional theory in GEM, and the demographic and cognitive approaches in PSED. The value added of this work lies in its novel characterization of the intellectual structure of entrepreneurship according to the academic production of these two initiatives. The results may be of interest to the managers and members of these observatories, as well as to academics, researchers, sponsors and policymakers interested in entrepreneurship.