Applying evidence from economic evaluations to translate cancer survivorship research into care

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Janet S. de Moor ; Catherine M. Alfano ; Nancy Breen…
• 关键词：Cancer survivorship ; Cost ; effectiveness ; Value ; Intervention ; Dissemination
• 刊名：Journal of Cancer Survivorship
• 出版年：2015
• 出版时间：September 2015
• 年：2015
• 卷：9
• 期：3
• 页码：560-566
• 全文大小：160 KB
• 参考文献：1.American Cancer Society. Cancer treatment survivorship facts figures, 2014-015. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2014.
  2.Alfano CM, Rowland JH. Recovery issues in cancer survivorship: a new challenge for supportive care. Cancer J. 2006;12(5):432-3.View Article PubMed
  3.Keating NL, Norredam M, Landrum MB, Huskamp HA, Meara E. Physical and mental health status of older long-term cancer survivors. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(12):2145-2. doi:10.-111/?j.-532-5415.-005.-0507.?x .View Article PubMed
  4.Stein KD, Syrjala KL, Andrykowski MA. Physical and psychological long-term and late effects of cancer. Cancer. 2008;112(11 Suppl):2577-2. doi:10.-002/?cncr.-3448 .View Article PubMed
  5.Weaver KE, Forsythe LP, Reeve BB, Alfano CM, Rodriguez JL, Sabatino SA, et al. Mental and physical health-related quality of life among U.S. cancer survivors: population estimates from the 2010 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(11):2108-7. doi:10.-158/-055-9965.?EPI-12-0740 .PubMed Central View Article PubMed
  6.Stanton AL. What happens now? Psychosocial care for cancer survivors after medical treatment completion. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(11):1215-0. doi:10.-200/?JCO.-011.-9.-406 .View Article PubMed
  7.Scott DA, Mills M, Black A, Cantwell M, Campbell A, Cardwell CR, et al. Multidimensional rehabilitation programmes for adult cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3, CD007730. doi:10.-002/-4651858.?CD007730.?pub2 .PubMed
  8.Johannsen M, Farver I, Beck N, Zachariae R. The efficacy of psychosocial intervention for pain in breast cancer patients and survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;138(3):675-0. doi:10.-007/?s10549-013-2503-4 .View Article PubMed
  9.Mishra SI, Scherer RW, Geigle PM, Berlanstein DR, Topaloglu O, Gotay CC, et al. Exercise interventions on health-related quality of life for cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;8, CD007566. doi:10.-002/-4651858.?CD007566.?pub2 .PubMed
  10.Glasgow RE, Emmons KM. How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed. Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413-3. doi:10.-146/?annurev.?publhealth.-8.-21406.-44145 .View Article PubMed
  11.Glasgow RE, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Estabrooks P. The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice? Ann Behav Med. 2004;27(1):3-2. doi:10.-207/?s15324796abm2701?_- .View Article PubMed
  12.Gordon LG, Beesley VL, Scuffham PA. Evidence on the economic value of psychosocial interventions to alleviate anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Asia-PacJ Clin Oncol. 2011;7(2):96-05. doi:10.-111/?j.-743-7563.-011.-1395.?x .View Article
  13.Mewes JC, Steuten LM, Ijzerman MJ, van Harten WH. Effectiveness of multidimensional cancer survivor rehabilitation and cost-effectiveness of cancer rehabilitation in general: a systematic review. Oncologist. 2012;17(12):1581-3. doi:10.-634/?theoncologist.-2012-0151 .PubMed Central View Article PubMed
  14.Deverka PA, Lavallee DC, Desai PJ, Esmail LC, Ramsey SD, Veenstra DL, et al. Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. J comp Eff Res. 2012;1(2):181-4. doi:10.-217/?cer.-2.- .PubMed Central View Article PubMed
  15.AA1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard 2011: Final Exposure Draft. London, UK: AccountAbility 2011.
  16.Concannon TW, Meissner P, Grunbaum JA, McElwee N, Guise JM, Santa J, et al. A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27(8):985-1. doi:10.-007/?s11606-012-2037-1 .PubMed Central View Article PubMed
  17.Hartzler A, McCarty CA, Rasmussen LV, Williams MS, Brilliant M, Bowton EA, et al. Stakeholder engagement: a key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records. Genet Med: Off J Am Coll Med Genet. 2013;15(10):792-01. doi:10.-038/?gim.-013.-27 .View Article
  18.Shiell A, Donaldson C, Mitton C, Currie G. Health economic evaluation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;56(2):85-.PubMed Central View Article PubMed
  19.Weinstein MC, Torrance G, McGuire A. QALYs: the basics. Value Health. 2009;12 Suppl 1:S5-. doi:10.-111/?j.-524-4733.-009.-0515.?x .View Article PubMed
  20.EuroQol G. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199-08.View Article
  21.Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21(2):271-2.View Article PubMed
  22.Greenberg D, Earle C, Fang CH, Eldar-Lissai A, Neumann PJ. When is cancer care cost-effective? A systematic overview of cost-utility analyses in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(2):82-. doi:10.-093/?jnci/?djp472 .PubMed Central View A
• 作者单位：Janet S. de Moor (1)
  Catherine M. Alfano (2)
  Nancy Breen (1)
  Erin E. Kent (3)
  Julia Rowland (4)
  
  1. Health Services and Economics Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 3E438, MSC 9764, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9764, USA
  2. Health Behaviors Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
  3. Outcomes Research Branch, Applied Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
  4. Office of Cancer Survivorship, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
  
• 刊物主题：Public Health; Oncology; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention; Health Informatics; Quality of Life Research; Primary Care Medicine;
• 出版者：Springer US
• ISSN：1932-2267

文摘

Purpose This paper summarizes recommendations stemming from the meeting, Applying Evidence from Economic Evaluations to Translate Cancer Survivorship Research into Care, hosted by the National Cancer Institute. Methods The meeting convened funded investigators, experts in cancer control, survivorship, health economics, and team science to identify the economic and health services data needed to facilitate the dissemination of cancer survivorship interventions into care and how survivorship and health economic investigators can successfully collaborate together and with other stakeholders. Results Recommendations from the meeting are as follows. First, investigators must engage key stakeholders early in the planning process to understand the outcomes and cost domains on which they base decisions. Second, evaluations of intervention efficacy and value should be conducted using standardized and comparable measures and analytic approaches to enable comparisons across studies. Finally, a health economist should be included during the planning phase of the study so that the economic evaluation is pursued in concert with the survivorship intervention. Conclusions Economic analyses, from the perspective of key stakeholders, must be incorporated into survivorship intervention research. The results from these analyses should be disseminated in a manner that is transparent, accessible, and comparable across studies. Implications for Cancer Survivors To optimize cancer survivors-health and quality of life, it is essential deliver high-quality and high-value care. Incorporating economic analyses into survivorship intervention research can inform the translation of effective interventions into practice.