Mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses of the Delphinidae with an emphasis on the Globicephalinae
详细信息 查看全文
- 作者：Julia T Vilstrup (1)
Simon YW Ho (2)
Andrew D Foote (1)
Phillip A Morin (3)
Danielle Kreb (4)
Michael Krützen (5)
Guido J Parra (6) (7)
Kelly M Robertson (3)
Renaud de Stephanis (8) (9)
Philippe Verborgh (8)
Eske Willerslev (1)
Ludovic Orlando (1)
M Thomas P Gilbert (1) - 刊名：BMC Evolutionary Biology
- 出版年：2011
- 出版时间：December 2011
- 年：2011
- 卷：11
- 期：1
- 全文大小：2161KB
- 参考文献：1. Brown WM, Prager EM, Wang A, Wilson AC: Mitochondrial DNA sequences of primates: tempo and mode of evolution. / J Mol Evol 1982, 18: 225-39. CrossRef
2. Moore WS: Inferring phylogenies from mtDNA variation: Mitochondrial-gene trees versus nuclear-gene trees. / Evolution 1995, 49: 718-26. CrossRef
3. Cummings MP, Otto SP, Wakeley J: Sampling properties of DNA sequence data in phylogenetic analysis. / Mol Biol Evol 1995, 12: 814-22.
4. Saitou N, Nei M: The number of nucleotides required to determine the branching order of three species with special reference to the human-chimpanzee-gorilla divergence. / J Mol Evol 1986, 24: 189-04. CrossRef
5. Ruvolo M, Disotell TR, Allard MW, Brown WM, Honeycutt RL: Resolution of the African homonid trichotomy by use of a mitochondrial gene sequence. / Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1991, 88: 1570-574. CrossRef
6. DeFilippis VR, Moore WS: Resolution of phylogenetic relationships among recently evolved species as a function of amount of DNA sequence: An empirical study based on woodpeckers (Aves: Picidae). / Mol Phyl Evol 2000, 16: 143-60. CrossRef
7. Rokas A, Carroll SB: More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. / Mol Biol Evol 2005, 22: 1337-344. CrossRef
8. Rohland N, Malaspinas AS, Pollack JL, Slatkin M, Matheus P, Hofreiter M: Proboscidean mitogenomics: Chronology and mode of elephant evolution using mastodon as outgroup. / PLoS Biol 2007, 5: e207. CrossRef
9. Maddison W: Reconstructing character evolution on polytomous cladograms. / Cladistics 1989, 5: 365-77. CrossRef
10. Willerslev E, Gilbert MTP, Binladen J, / et al.: Analysis of complete mitochondrial genomes from extinct and extant rhinoceroses reveals lack of phylogenetic resolution. / BMC Evol Biol 2009, 9: 95. CrossRef
11. Hudson RR: Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. / Oxford Surv Evol Biol 1990, 7: 1-4.
12. Hoelzer GA, Melnick DJ: Patterns of speciation and limits to phylogenetic resolution. / Trends Ecol Evol 1994, 9: 104-07. CrossRef
13. Jackman TR, Larson A, de Queiroz K, Losos JB: Phylogenetic relationships and tempo of early diversification in Anolis lizards. / Syst Biol 1999, 48: 254-85. CrossRef
14. Walsh HE, Kidd MG, Moum T, Friesen VL: Polytomies and the power of phylogenetic inference. / Evolution 1999, 53: 932-37. CrossRef
15. Bolnick DI: Multi-species outcomes in a common model of sympatric speciation. / J Theor Biol 2006, 241: 734-44.
16. Meyer M, Stenzel U, Hofreiter M: Parallel tagged sequencing on the 454 platform. / Nature Protocols 2008, 3: 267-78. CrossRef
17. Morin PA, Archer FI, Foote AD, / et al.: Complete mitochondrial genome phylogeographic analysis of killer whales ( Orcinus orca ) indicates multiple species. / Genome Res 2010, 20: 908-16. CrossRef
18. Shen YY, Liang L, Sun YB, Yue BS, Yang XJ, Murphy RW, Zhang YP: A mitogenomic perspective on the ancient, rapid radiation in the Galliformes with an emphasis on the Phasianidae. / BMC Evol Biol 2010, 10: 132. CrossRef
19. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M: Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. / Mol Biol Evol 1999, 16: 1114-116.
20. Slowinski JB: Molecular polytomies. / Mol Phyl Evol 2001, 19: 114-20. CrossRef
21. LeDuc RG, Perrin WF, Dizon AE: Phylogenetic relationships among the Delphinid cetaceans based on full cytochrome b sequences. / Mar Mamm Sci 1999, 15: 619-48. CrossRef
22. May-Collado L, Agnarsson I: Cytochrome b and Bayesian inference of whale phylogeny. / Mol Phyl Evol 2006, 38: 344-54. CrossRef
23. Nishida S, Goto M, Pastene LA, Kanda N, Koike H: Phylogenetic relationships among cetaceans revealed by Y-chromosome sequences. / Zool Sci 2007, 24: 723-32. CrossRef
24. Caballero S, Jackson J, Mignucci-Giannoni AA, Barrios-Garrido H, Beltrán-Pedreros S, Montiel-Villalobos MG, Robertson KM, Baker CS: Molecular systematics of South American dolphins Sotalia : sister taxa determination and phylogenetic relationships, with insights into a multilocus phylogeny of the Delphinidae. / Mol Phyl Evol 2008, 46: 252-68. CrossRef
25. Kingston SE, Adams LD, Rosel PE: Testing mitochondrial sequences and anonymous nuclear markers for phylogeny reconstruction in a rapidly radiating group: molecular systematics of the Delphinidae (Cetacea: Odontoceti: Delphinidae). / BMC Evol Biol 2009, 9: 245. CrossRef
26. McGowen MR, Spaulding M, Gatesy J: Divergence date estimation and a comprehensive molecular tree of extant cetaceans. / Mol Phyl Evol 2009, 53: 891-06. CrossRef
27. Steeman ME, Hebsgaard MB, Fordyce RE, / et al.: Radiation of extant cetaceans driven by restructuring of the oceans. / Syst Biol 2009, 58: 573-85. CrossRef
28. Xiong YE, Brandley MC, Xu S, Zhou K, Yang G: Seven new dolphin mitochondrial genomes and a time-calibrated phylogeny of whales. / BMC Evol Biol 2009, 9: 20. CrossRef
29. Perrin WF: Dolphins, porpoises, and whales. / An action plan for the conservation of biological diversity: 1988-992, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland 1989.
30. Lartillot N, Philippe H: Computing Bayes factor using thermodynamic integration. / Syst Biol 2005, 55: 195-07. CrossRef
31. Xie W, Lewis PO, Fan Y, Kuo L, Chen M-H: Improving marginal likelihood estimation for Bayesian phylogenetic model selection. / Syst Biol 2011, in press.
32. Haq BH, Hardenbol J, Vail PR: Chronology of fluctuating sea levels since the Triassic. / Science 1987, 235: 1156-162. CrossRef
33. Beasley I, Robertson KM, Arnold P: Description of a new dolphin, the Australian snubfin dolphin Orcaella heinsohni sp. N. (Cetacea, Delphinidae). / Mar Mam Sci 2005, 21: 365-00. CrossRef
34. Dwyer GS, Cronin TM, Baker PA, Raymo ME, Buzas JS, Corrège T: North Atlantic deepwater temperature change during late Pliocene and late Quaternary climactic cycles. / Science 1995, 270: 1347-351. CrossRef
35. Ravelo AC, Andreasen DH, Lyle M, Olivarez-Lyle A, Wara MW: Regional climate shifts caused by gradual global cooling in the Pliocene epoch. / Nature 2004, 429: 263-67. CrossRef
36. Wara MW, Ravelo A-C, Delaney ML: Permanent El Ni?o-like conditions during the Pliocene warm period. / Science 2005, 309: 758-61. CrossRef
37. Lawrence KT, Liu Z, Herbert TD: Evolution of the Eastern Tropical Pacific through Pio-Pleistocene glaciation. / Science 2006, 312: 79-3. CrossRef
38. Weisrock DW, Shaffer HB, Storz BL, Storz SR, Voss AR: Multiple nuclear gene sequences identify species boundaries in the rapidly radiating clade of Mexican ambystomatid salamanders. / Mol Ecol 2006, 15: 2489-503. CrossRef
39. Springer MS, DeBry RW, Douady C, Amrine HM, Madsen O, de Jong WW, Stanhope MJ: Mitochondrial Versus Nuclear Gene Sequences in Deep-Level Mammalian Phylogeny Reconstruction. / Mol Biol Evol 2001, 18 (2) : 132-43.
40. McCracken KG, Sorenson MD: Is homoplasy or lineage sorting the source of incongruent mtDNA and nuclear gene trees in the stiff-tailed ducks ( Nomonyx-Oxyura ). / Syst Biol 2005, 54: 35-5. CrossRef
41. Milinkovitch, LeDuc, Tiedemann, Dizon : Applications of Molecular Data in Cetacean Taxonomy and Population Genetics with Special Emphasis on Defining Species Boundaries. In / 'Marine Mammals: Biology and Conservation'. Edited by: Evans PGH, J A. Kluwer Academic Press; 2002:325-59.
42. Oremus M, Gales R, Dalebout ML, Funahashi N, Endo T, Kage T, Steel D, Baker SC: Worldwide mitochondrial DNA diversity and phylogeography of pilot whales ( Globicephala spp). / Biol J Linn Soc 2009, 98: 729-44. CrossRef
43. Pollock DD, Zwickl DJ, McGuire JA, Hillis DM: Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference. / Syst Biol 2002, 51 (4) : 664-71. CrossRef
44. Zwickl DJ, Hillis DM: Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. / Syst Biol 2002, 51 (4) : 588-98. CrossRef
45. Harlin-Cognato AD, Honeycutt RL: Multi-locus phylogeny of dolphins in the subfamily Lissodelphininae: character synergy improves phylogenetic resolution. / BMC Evol Biol 2006, 6: 87. CrossRef
46. Palsb?ll PJ, Larsen F, Hansen ES: Sampling of skin biopsies from free-ranging large cetaceans in West Greenland: development of new biopsy tips and bolt designs. / Rep Int Whaling Commn 1991, (Special 13) : 71-9.
47. Amos W, Hoelzel AR: Long-term preservation of whale skin for DNA analysis. / Rep Int Whaling Commn 1991, (Special 13) : 99-03.
48. Arnason U, Gullberg A, Janke A: Mitogenomic analyses provide new insights into cetacean origin and evolution. / Gene 2004, 333: 27-4. CrossRef
49. Yan J, Zhou K, Yang G: Molecular phylogenetics of river dolphin's and the baiji mitochondrial genome. / Mol Phyl Evol 2005, 37: 743-50. CrossRef
50. Keane TM, Creevey CJ, Pentony MM, Naughton TJ, McInerney JO: Assessment of methods for amino acid matrix selection and their use on empirical data shows that ad hoc assumptions for choice of matrix are not justified. / BMC Evol Biol 2006, 6: 29. CrossRef
51. Luo A, Qiao H, Zhang Y, Shi W, Ho SYW, Xu W, Zhang A, Zhu C: Performance of criteria for selecting evolutionary models in phylogenetics: a comprehensive study based on simulated datasets. / BMC Evol Biol 2010, 10: 242. CrossRef
52. Yang Z: Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. / Mol Biol Evol 1993, 10: 1396-401.
53. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A: BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. / BMC Evol Biol 2007, 7: 214. CrossRef
54. Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A: Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. / PLoS Biol 2006, 4: e88. CrossRef
55. Aguirre-Fernandez G, Barnes LG, Aranda-Manteca FJ, Fernandez-Rivera JR: Protoglobicephala mexicana , a new genus and species of Pliocene fossil dolphin (Cetacea; Odontoceti; Delphinidae) from the gulf of California, Mexico. / Boletin de la Sociodad Geologica Mexicana 2009, 61 (2) : 245-65.
56. Ho SYW, Lanfear R: Characterising rate variation in cetacean mitogenomes using codon-partitioned relaxed clocks. / Mitochondrial DNA 2010, 21 (3-) : 138-46. CrossRef
57. Rambaut A, Drummond A: Tracer, version 1.4. [http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer] 2007.
58. Suchard MA, Weiss RE, Sinsheimer JS: Bayesian selection of continuous-time Markov chain evolutionary models. / Mol Biol Evol 2001, 18 (6) : 1001-013.
59. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F: MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. / Bioinformatics Applications Note 2001, 17 (8) : 754-55.
60. Guindon S, Gascuel O: A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. / Syst Biol 2003, 52 (5) : 696-04. CrossRef
61. Posada D, Crandall KA: Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. / Bioinformatics 1998, 14 (9) : 817-18. CrossRef
62. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M: CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. / Bioinformatics 2001, 17 (12) : 1246-247. CrossRef
63. Huson DH, Richter DC, Rausch C, Dezulian T, Franz M, Rupp R: Dendroscope: An interactive viewer for large phyogenetic trees. / BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8: 460. CrossRef - 作者单位：Julia T Vilstrup (1)
Simon YW Ho (2)
Andrew D Foote (1)
Phillip A Morin (3)
Danielle Kreb (4)
Michael Krützen (5)
Guido J Parra (6) (7)
Kelly M Robertson (3)
Renaud de Stephanis (8) (9)
Philippe Verborgh (8)
Eske Willerslev (1)
Ludovic Orlando (1)
M Thomas P Gilbert (1)
1. Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, ?ster Voldgade 5-7, 1350, Copenhagen, Denmark
2. School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney, 2006, Sydney, NSW, Australia
3. Southwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, 3333 N. Torrey Pines Ct, 92037, La Jolla, CA, USA
4. Yayasan Konservasi RASI, Samarinda, Kalimantan Timur, Indonesia
5. Evolutionary Genetics Group, Anthropological Institute and Museum, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 190, 8057, Zurich, Switzerland
6. School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Lincoln Marine Science Centre, GPO BOX 2100, 5001, Adelaide, SA, Australia
7. South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), PO Box 120, 5022, Henley Beach, SA, Australia
8. CIRCE, Conservation Information and Research on Cetaceans, C/Cabeza de Manzaneda 3, Algeciras-Pelayo, 11390, Cadiz, Spain
9. Departamento de Biologia de la Conservación, Estación Biologica de Donana, CSIC, C/Americo Vespucio S/N, Isla de la Cartuja, 41092, Sevilla, Spain
文摘
Background Previous DNA-based phylogenetic studies of the Delphinidae family suggest it has undergone rapid diversification, as characterised by unresolved and poorly supported taxonomic relationships (polytomies) for some of the species within this group. Using an increased amount of sequence data we test between alternative hypotheses of soft polytomies caused by rapid speciation, slow evolutionary rate and/or insufficient sequence data, and hard polytomies caused by simultaneous speciation within this family. Combining the mitogenome sequences of five new and 12 previously published species within the Delphinidae, we used Bayesian and maximum-likelihood methods to estimate the phylogeny from partitioned and unpartitioned mitogenome sequences. Further ad hoc tests were then conducted to estimate the support for alternative topologies. Results We found high support for all the relationships within our reconstructed phylogenies, and topologies were consistent between the Bayesian and maximum-likelihood trees inferred from partitioned and unpartitioned data. Resolved relationships included the placement of the killer whale (Orcinus orca) as sister taxon to the rest of the Globicephalinae subfamily, placement of the Risso's dolphin (Grampus griseus) within the Globicephalinae subfamily, removal of the white-beaked dolphin (Lagenorhynchus albirostris) from the Delphininae subfamily and the placement of the rough-toothed dolphin (Steno bredanensis) as sister taxon to the rest of the Delphininae subfamily rather than within the Globicephalinae subfamily. The additional testing of alternative topologies allowed us to reject all other putative relationships, with the exception that we were unable to reject the hypothesis that the relationship between L. albirostris and the Globicephalinae and Delphininae subfamilies was polytomic. Conclusion Despite their rapid diversification, the increased sequence data yielded by mitogenomes enables the resolution of a strongly supported, bifurcating phylogeny, and a chronology of the divergences within the Delphinidae family. This highlights the benefits and potential application of large mitogenome datasets to resolve long-standing phylogenetic uncertainties.