Does teaching benefit from university–industry collaboration? Investigating the role of academic commercialization and engagement

详细信息    查看全文

• 作者：Yuandi Wang ; Ruifeng Hu ; Weiping Li ; Xiongfeng Pan
• 关键词：Chinese universities ; Teaching ; University commercialization ; University engagement ; University–industry collaboration
• 刊名：Scientometrics
• 出版年：2016
• 出版时间：March 2016
• 年：2016
• 卷：106
• 期：3
• 页码：1037-1055
• 全文大小：476 KB
• 参考文献：Arza, V. (2010). Channels, benefits and risks of public-private interactions for knowledge transfer: Conceptual framework inspired by Latin America. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 473–484.CrossRef
  Bekkers, R., & Bodas Freitas, I. M. (2008). Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? Research Policy, 37(10), 1837–1853.CrossRef
  Berbegal-Mirabent, J., Garcia, J. L. S., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. E. (2015). University–industry partnerships for the provision of R&D services. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1407–1413.CrossRef
  Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734–1739.CrossRef
  Bodas Freitas, I. M., Marques, R. A., & Silva, E. M. D. P. E. (2013). University–industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42(2), 443–453.CrossRef
  Bray, M. J., & Lee, J. N. (2000). University revenues from technology transfer: Licensing fees versus equity positions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5/6), 385–392.CrossRef
  Breschi, S., & Catalini, C. (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Research Policy, 39(1), 14–26.CrossRef
  Brooks, H., & Randazzese, L. (1999). University–industry relations: The next 4 years and beyon. In L. M. Branscomb & J. Keller (Eds.), Investing in innovation: Creating and innovation policy that works. Combridge: MIT Press.
  Bulut, H., & Moschini, G. (2009). US universities’ net returns from patenting and licensing: A quantile regression analysis. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 18(2), 123–137.CrossRef
  Chatterjee, S., & Price, B. (1991). Regression analysis by example. New York: Wiley.
  Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.CrossRef
  Dutrenit, G., De Fuentes, C., & Torres, A. (2010). Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: Evidence from Mexico. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 513–526.CrossRef
  Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833.CrossRef
  Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313–330.CrossRef
  Fan, X., Yang, X., & Chen, L. (2015). Diversified resources and academic influence: Patterns of university–industry collaboration in Chinese research-oriented universities. Scientometrics, 104(2), 489–509.CrossRef
  Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. (2003). University patenting and its effects on academic research, SPRU Electronic Working paper series no. 99, Brighton, SPRU.
  Gluck, M. E., Blumenthal, D., & Stoto, M. A. (1987). University–industry relationships in the life sciences: Implications for students and post-doctoral fellows. Research Policy, 16(6), 327–336.CrossRef
  Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J.-C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950.CrossRef
  Hemmert, M., Bstieler, L., & Okamuro, H. (2014). Bridging the cultural divide: Trust formation in university–industry research collaborations in the US. Japan, and South Korea, Technovation, 34(10), 605–616.
  Hicks, D., & Hamilton, K. S. (1999). Does university–industry collaboration adversely affect university research? Issues in Science & Technology, Summer, 99(16), 74–75.
  Hsu, D. W. L., Shen, Y.-C., Yuan, B. J. C., & Chou, C. J. (2015). Toward successful commercialization of university technology: Performance drivers of university technology transfer in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 92, 25–39.CrossRef
  Lin, M.-W., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers’ industry experience and productivity in university–industry research centers: A “scientific and technical human capital” explanation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 269–290.CrossRef
  Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641–655.CrossRef
  Lv, P. (2014). How does openness affect innovation? Evidence from national key laboratories in China. Science and Public Policy, 41, 180–193.CrossRef
  McAdam, R., Miller, K., McAdam, M., & Teague, S. (2012). The development of university technology transfer stakeholder relationships at a regional level: Lessons for the future. Technovation, 32(1), 57–67.CrossRef
  Meyer, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research-Based Ventures and Public Support Mechanisms, R&D Management, 33(2), 107–115.
  Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835–851.CrossRef
  Montesinos, P., Carot, J. M., Martinez, J. M., & Mora, F. (2008). Third mission ranking for world class universities: Beyond teaching and research. Higher Education in Europe, 33(2/3), 259–271.CrossRef
  Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2015). Markets versus spillovers in outflows of university research. Research Policy, 44(1), 50–66.CrossRef
  Muscio, A., Quaglione, D., & Scarpinato, M. (2012). The effects of universities’ proximity to industrial districts on university–industry collaboration. China Economic Review, 23(3), 639–650.CrossRef
  Perkmann, M., & Schildt, H. (2015). Open data partnerships between firms and universities: The role of boundary organizations. Research Policy, 44(5), 1133–1143.CrossRef
  Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.CrossRef
  Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., & Gassler, H. (2001). Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 255–268.CrossRef
  Sutz, J. (2000). The university–industry–government relations in Latin America. Research Policy, 29(2), 279–290.CrossRef
  Tartari, V., & Breschi, S. (2012). Set them free: Scientists’ evaluations of the benefits and costs of university–industry research collaboration. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(5), 1117–1147.CrossRef
  Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2002). Who is selling the ivory tower? Sources of growth in university licensing. Management Science, 48(1), 90–104.CrossRef
  Torres, A., Dutrenit, G., Sampedro, J. L., & Becerra, N. (2011). What are the factors driving university–industry linkages in latecomer firms: Evidence from Mexico. Science and Public Policy, 38(1), 31–42.CrossRef
  Van Looy, B., Callaert, J., & Debackere, K. (2006). Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy, 35(4), 596–608.CrossRef
  Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425–441.CrossRef
  Vavakova, B. (1998). The new social contract between governments, universities and society: Has the old one failed? Minerva, 36(3), 209–228.CrossRef
  Wang, Y., Huang, J., Chen, Y., Pan, X., & Chen, J. (2013). Have Chinese universities embraced their third mission? New insight from a business perspective. Scientometrics, 97(2), 207–222.CrossRef
  Wang, Y., Roijakkers, N., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chen, J. (2012). How Chinese firms employ open innovation to strengthen their innovative performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 59(3/4), 235–254.CrossRef
  Wang, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2013). The dual role of local sites in assisting firms with developing technological capabilities: Evidence from China. International Business Review, 22(1), 63–76.CrossRef
  
• 作者单位：Yuandi Wang (1) (2)
  Ruifeng Hu (1)
  Weiping Li (1)
  Xiongfeng Pan (3)
  
  1. Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China
  2. Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research Institute, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610064, China
  3. School of Economics, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, 116024, China
  
• 刊物主题：Information Storage and Retrieval; Library Science; Interdisciplinary Studies;
• 出版者：Springer Netherlands
• ISSN：1588-2861

文摘

With the incorporation of universities’ third mission into their traditional teaching and academic research activities, there has been a burgeoning literature on how the third mission influences universities’ academic research, though there is little research on its impact on universities’ traditional mission—teaching. This study thus intends to strengthen our understanding of the relationships among universities’ three missions by examining the relationship between university and industry collaboration and university teaching performance. Thanks to a unique combined dataset from 61 universities from 2009 to 2013, empirical results indicate that there are distinct effects of collaboration channels on teaching performance. Specifically, there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between academic commercialization and teaching performance, while there is a U-shaped relationship between academic engagement and teaching performance. Academic commercialization and engagement yield a combined positive effect on teaching.