Vomer flap for hard palate repair is related to favorable maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate
详细信息    查看全文
  • 作者:Yu-Fang Liao (1) (2) (3) (4)
    Ying-Hsin Lee (3)
    Ruby Wang (1)
    Chiung-Shing Huang (1) (2) (3) (5)
    Philip Kuo-Ting Chen (1) (2) (3) (6)
    Lun-Jou Lo (1) (2) (3) (6)
    Yu-Ray Chen (1) (2) (3) (6)
  • 关键词:Facial growth ; Technique of palate repair ; Treatment outcome ; Unilateral cleft lip and palate
  • 刊名:Clinical Oral Investigations
  • 出版年:2014
  • 出版时间:May 2014
  • 年:2014
  • 卷:18
  • 期:4
  • 页码:1269-1276
  • 全文大小:
  • 参考文献:1. Graber TM (1954) The congenital cleft palate deformity. J Am Dent Assoc 48:375-95
    2. Ross RB (1987) Treatment variables affecting growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 7: an overview of treatment and facial growth. Cleft Palate J 24:71-7
    3. Mars M, Houston WJ (1990) A preliminary study of facial growth and morphology in unoperated male unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects over 13?years of age. Cleft Palate J 27:7-0 CrossRef
    4. Liao YF, Mars M (2005) Long-term effects of palate repair on craniofacial morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:594-00 CrossRef
    5. Liao YF, Mars M (2005) Long-term effects of clefts on craniofacial morphology in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:601-09 CrossRef
    6. Liao YF, Cole TJ, Mars M (2006) Hard palate repair timing and facial growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a longitudinal study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 43:547-56 CrossRef
    7. Ross RB (1970) The clinical implications of facial growth in cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate J 7:37-7
    8. Ross RB (1987) Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 6: technique of palate repair. Cleft Palate J 24:64-0
    9. Brattstr?m V, M?lsted K, Prahl-Andersen B (2005) The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 2: craniofacial form and nasolabial appearance. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:69-7 CrossRef
    10. Daskalogiannakis J, Mercado A, Russell K (2011) The Americleft study: an intercenter study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: part 3. Analysis of craniofacial form. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:252-58 CrossRef
    11. M?lsted K, Brattstr?m V, Prahl-Andersen B (2005) The Eurocleft study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 3: dental arch relationships. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 42:78-2 CrossRef
    12. Hathaway R, Daskalogiannakis J, Mercado A (2011) The Americleft study: an intercenter study of treatment outcomes for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 2: dental arch relationships. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 48:244-51 CrossRef
    13. Pruzansky S, Aduss H (1967) Prevalence of arch collapse and malocclusion in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc 365-82
    14. Sarnat BG, Wexler MR (1968) Postnatal growth of the nose and face after resection of septal cartilage in the rabbit. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 26:712-27 CrossRef
    15. Bergland O, Sidhu SS (1974) Occlusal changes from the deciduous to the early mixed dentition in unilateral complete clefts. Cleft Palate J 11:317-26
    16. Friede H, Morgan P (1976) Growth of the vomero-premaxillary suture in children with bilateral cleft lip and palate. A histological and roentgen cephalometric study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 10:45-5
    17. Friede H, Johanson B (1977) A follow-up study of cleft children treated with vomer flap as part of a three-stage soft tissue surgical procedure. Facial morphology and dental occlusion. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 11:45-7 CrossRef
    18. Friede H (1978) The vomero-premaxillary suture—a neglected growth site in mid-facial development of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate J 15:398-04
    19. Delaire J, Precious D (1985) Avoidance of the use of vomerine mucosa in primary surgical management of velopalatine clefts. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 60:589-97 CrossRef
    20. Friede H, M?ller M, Lilja J, Lauritzen C (1987) Facial morphology and occlusion at the stage of early mixed dentition in cleft lip and palate patients treated with delayed closure of the hard palate. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 21:65-1 CrossRef
    21. Bardach J, Salyer KE (1987) Surgical techniques in cleft lip and palate. Year Book Medical, St. Louis
    22. Bj?rk A, Skieller V (1983) Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25?years. Eur J Orthod 5:1-6 CrossRef
    23. Ross RB (1987) Treatment variables affecting facial growth in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Part 1: treatment affecting growth. Cleft Palate J 24:5-3
    24. Liao YF, Yang IY, Wang R, Yun C, Huang CS (2010) Two-stage palate repair with delayed hard palate closure is related to favorable maxillary growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1503-510 CrossRef
    25. Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience Publication, New York
    26. Zeger SL, Liang KY (1986) Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics 121-30
    27. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL (1994) Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford University Press, New York
    28. Kulewicz M, Dudkiewicz Z (2010) Craniofacial morphological outcome following treatment with three different surgical protocols for complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: a preliminary study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:122-28 CrossRef
    29. Fudalej PS, Katsaros C, Dudkiewicz Z (2013) Cephalometric outcome of two types of palatoplasty in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:144-48 CrossRef
    30. Semb G (1991) A study of facial growth in patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate treated by the Oslo CLP Team. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 28:22-9 CrossRef
    31. Filho OG, Calvano F, Assun??o AG (2001) Craniofacial morphology in children with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate: a comparison of two surgical protocols. Angle Orthod 71:274-84
    32. Johnston CD, Leonard AG, Burden DJ (2004) A comparison of craniofacial form in Northern Irish children with unilateral cleft lip and palate treated with different primary surgical techniques. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 41:42-6 CrossRef
    33. Wijdeveld MG, Maltha JC, Grupping EM (1991) A histological study of tissue response to simulated cleft palate surgery at different ages in beagle dogs. Arch Oral Biol 36:837-43 CrossRef
    34. Leenstra TS, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM (1995) Wound healing in beagle dogs after palatal repair without denudation of bone. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 32:363-69 CrossRef
    35. Liao YF, Prasad NKK, Chiu YT, Yun C, Chen PK (2010) Cleft size at the time of palate repair in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate as an indicator of maxillary growth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:956-61 CrossRef
  • 作者单位:Yu-Fang Liao (1) (2) (3) (4)
    Ying-Hsin Lee (3)
    Ruby Wang (1)
    Chiung-Shing Huang (1) (2) (3) (5)
    Philip Kuo-Ting Chen (1) (2) (3) (6)
    Lun-Jou Lo (1) (2) (3) (6)
    Yu-Ray Chen (1) (2) (3) (6)

    1. Craniofacial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
    2. Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan
    3. College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
    4. Department of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 123, Dinghu Road Gueishan Township, Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
    5. Department of Craniofacial Orthodontics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
    6. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan
  • ISSN:1436-3771
文摘
Objective Vomer flap repair is assumed to improve maxillary growth because of reduced scarring in growth-sensitive areas of the palate. Our aim was to evaluate whether facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate was significantly affected by the technique of hard palate repair (vomer flap versus two-flap). Materials and methods For this retrospective longitudinal study, we analyzed 334 cephalometric radiographs from 95 patients with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who underwent hard palate repair by two different techniques (vomer flap versus two-flap). Clinical notes were reviewed to record treatment histories. Cephalometry was used to determine facial morphology and growth rate. The associations among facial morphology at age 20, facial growth rate, and technique of hard palate repair were assessed using generalized estimating equation analysis. Results The hard palate repair technique significantly influenced protrusion of the maxilla (SNA: β-??3.5°, 95?% CI-??5.2-1.7; p--.001) and the anteroposterior jaw relation (ANB: β-??4.2°, 95?% CI-??6.4-1.9; p--.001; Wits: β-??5.7?mm, 95?% CI-??9.6-1.2; p--.01) at age 20, and their growth rates (SNA p--.001, ANB p-lt;-.01, and Wits p--.02). Conclusions The results suggest that in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate, vomer flap repair has a smaller adverse effect than two-flap on growth of the maxilla. This effect on maxillary growth is on the anteroposterior development of the alveolar maxilla and is progressive with age. We now perform hard palate closure with vomer flap followed by soft palate closure using Furlow palatoplasty. Clinical relevance These findings may improve treatment outcome by modifying the treatment protocol for patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700