地方士人与宋元变革管窥——杨万里集外佚文《桃林罗氏族谱序》考实
|
摘要
《桃林罗氏族谱序》是南宋著名士大夫杨万里一篇集外佚文,在前人论述的基础上,作者结合多年来对南宋士人杨万里、罗大经的深入研究,从该序文的写作时间、作者署名官衔、序文内容的真实性几个方面进一步证实了《桃林罗氏族谱序》确实为杨万里的一篇集外佚文。又结合该序文中"士族"一词内涵在南宋的演变,论述了南宋未入仕士人在地方社会生活中的突出影响,并揭示了这一现象实为后世明清地方乡绅社会之发端。
The Preface to the Pedigree of the Luo Family in Taolin is a lost article of the famous scholar Yang Wanli of the Southern Song Dynasty. On the basis of the existing research and the in-depth study of Yang Wanli and Luo Dajing, the Southern Song Dynasty scholars, the author further verifies that The Preface to the Pedigree of the Luo Family in Taolin is indeed a lost article of Yang Wanli according to the time of writing, the author's signature and official title,as well as the authenticity of the content. Moreover, according to the evolution of the term "Shizu"(intelligentsia) of the Southern Song Dynasty in the preface, the author also discusses the prominent influence of the Southern Song scholars who are not engaged in politics on local social life, and reveals that this phenomenon is the beginning of the squire society in the later Ming and Qing Dynasties.
The Preface to the Pedigree of the Luo Family in Taolin is a lost article of the famous scholar Yang Wanli of the Southern Song Dynasty. On the basis of the existing research and the in-depth study of Yang Wanli and Luo Dajing, the Southern Song Dynasty scholars, the author further verifies that The Preface to the Pedigree of the Luo Family in Taolin is indeed a lost article of Yang Wanli according to the time of writing, the author's signature and official title,as well as the authenticity of the content. Moreover, according to the evolution of the term "Shizu"(intelligentsia) of the Southern Song Dynasty in the preface, the author also discusses the prominent influence of the Southern Song scholars who are not engaged in politics on local social life, and reveals that this phenomenon is the beginning of the squire society in the later Ming and Qing Dynasties.
引文
[1] 杨瑞.杨万里佚文考[J].文教资料,2010(21):8-10.
[2] 罗大经.鹤林玉露[M]//唐宋史料笔记丛刊.王瑞来,点校.北京:中华书局,1983.
[3] 王瑞来.小官僚,大关注:罗大经仕履考析[J].文史哲,2014(1):104-111.
[4] 周远成.《周氏五修族谱》泥田旧序——宋杨万里佚文一篇[J].衡阳师范学院学报,2016(2):163-166.
[5] 萧东海.新发现杨万里佚文《五一堂记》述考[J].文献,1990(3):3-7.
[6] 胡建升.杨万里佚文考[J].文献,2006(2):101-104.
[7] 纪永贵.杨万里佚文《罗塘许氏族谱序》辨伪[J].文献,2007(1):75-81.
[8] 王瑞来.范仲淹《题叶氏卷》诗当属伪作[N].中国文物报,2011-03-09.
[9] 杨万里.诚斋集[M].辛更儒,笺校本.北京:中华书局,2007.
[10] 脱脱.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[11] 佚名.重编详备碎金[M].《汉籍之部》第六卷影印本.日本天理大学图书馆善本丛书,1981.
[12] 罗钦顺.整庵存稿·卷九[M].文渊阁四库全书本.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[13] 杨士奇.东里集[M].文渊阁四库全书本.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
(1)参见王瑞来:《小官僚,大关注:罗大经仕履考析》。此文尚有一副标题为:“宋元变革论实证研究举隅之三”。
(2)“选海”一词,见于宋人赵升《朝野类要》卷二《选调》:“承直郎以下,迪功郎以上文资也。又谓之选海,以其难出常调也。”王瑞来点校《唐宋史料笔记丛刊》本。北京:中华书局,2007年。
(1)文载《鹤林玉露》附录1第350页-361页。又载《学林漫录》五集,北京:中华书局,1982年。
(2)文载《鹤林玉露》2005年版附录4第392页-421页。又载《中国典籍与文化》第2期,2012年。
[2] 罗大经.鹤林玉露[M]//唐宋史料笔记丛刊.王瑞来,点校.北京:中华书局,1983.
[3] 王瑞来.小官僚,大关注:罗大经仕履考析[J].文史哲,2014(1):104-111.
[4] 周远成.《周氏五修族谱》泥田旧序——宋杨万里佚文一篇[J].衡阳师范学院学报,2016(2):163-166.
[5] 萧东海.新发现杨万里佚文《五一堂记》述考[J].文献,1990(3):3-7.
[6] 胡建升.杨万里佚文考[J].文献,2006(2):101-104.
[7] 纪永贵.杨万里佚文《罗塘许氏族谱序》辨伪[J].文献,2007(1):75-81.
[8] 王瑞来.范仲淹《题叶氏卷》诗当属伪作[N].中国文物报,2011-03-09.
[9] 杨万里.诚斋集[M].辛更儒,笺校本.北京:中华书局,2007.
[10] 脱脱.宋史[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[11] 佚名.重编详备碎金[M].《汉籍之部》第六卷影印本.日本天理大学图书馆善本丛书,1981.
[12] 罗钦顺.整庵存稿·卷九[M].文渊阁四库全书本.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
[13] 杨士奇.东里集[M].文渊阁四库全书本.台北:台湾商务印书馆,1986.
(1)参见王瑞来:《小官僚,大关注:罗大经仕履考析》。此文尚有一副标题为:“宋元变革论实证研究举隅之三”。
(2)“选海”一词,见于宋人赵升《朝野类要》卷二《选调》:“承直郎以下,迪功郎以上文资也。又谓之选海,以其难出常调也。”王瑞来点校《唐宋史料笔记丛刊》本。北京:中华书局,2007年。
(1)文载《鹤林玉露》附录1第350页-361页。又载《学林漫录》五集,北京:中华书局,1982年。
(2)文载《鹤林玉露》2005年版附录4第392页-421页。又载《中国典籍与文化》第2期,2012年。