科学决策与专家咨询——基于省级地方政府制度建构的分析
|
摘要
在行政决策过程中引入专家咨询,能更好地实现决策科学化、民主化;同时也是建设法治政府,改善决策体制的应有之义。省级地方政府在中央精神的指导下对专家咨询制度开展了探索并取得一些成效,然而在制度实际运行中所暴露出的共性或个性问题说明专家咨询制度的建构仍需完善。通过对省级地方政府政策文本的分析,有助于认识和理解专家咨询的现状并对其补苴罅漏。
To introduce expert consulting into administrative policy-making can make the policy-making process more scientific and democratic,and it also considered as a must to build a government ruled by law and improve the policy-making system. Under the guidance of the central government,Chinese provincial governments have launched some research on expert consulting system and made some results,however the common and individual problems exposed in practice show that the expert consulting system still needs improvement. Through a thorough analysis of the policy documents of provincial governments,this study provides a better understanding of the status quo of the expert consulting system with recommendations to make up deficiencies.
To introduce expert consulting into administrative policy-making can make the policy-making process more scientific and democratic,and it also considered as a must to build a government ruled by law and improve the policy-making system. Under the guidance of the central government,Chinese provincial governments have launched some research on expert consulting system and made some results,however the common and individual problems exposed in practice show that the expert consulting system still needs improvement. Through a thorough analysis of the policy documents of provincial governments,this study provides a better understanding of the status quo of the expert consulting system with recommendations to make up deficiencies.
引文
[1]俞可平.论国家治理现代化[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2014.
[2]贺德方.完善专家咨询制度的对策建议[N].学习时报,2008-3-10(03).
[3]罗豪才,湛中乐.行政法学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012.
[4]赵万里,李艳红.专家体制与公共决策的技术—政治过程[J].自然辩证法研究,2009(11):79-83.
[5]朱伟.民意、知识和权力:政策制定过程中公众、专家与政府的互动模式研究[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2014.
[6]朱水成,潘知.政策议程理论综述[J].行政与法,2014(11):1-7.
[7]陈振明.政策科学—公共政策分析导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
[8][美]托马斯·R·戴伊.理解公共政策[M].北京:华夏出版社,2004.
[9][美]约翰·W·金登.议程、备选方案与公共政策[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[10]宁骚.公共政策学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2014.
[11]王锡锌.我国公共决策专家咨询制度的悖论及其克服—以美国<联邦咨询委员会法>为借鉴[J].法商研究,2007(2):113-121.
[12]李卫华.专家参与行政:现状、取向与法律规范[J].新视野,2012(2):66-68.
[13]杨寅.行政决策程序、监督与责任制度[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2011.
[14]刘伟,黄健荣.当代中国政策议程创建模式嬗变分析[J].公共管理学报,2008(3):30-40.
[15]徐增辉,刘志光.政策议程设置的途径分析[J].学术研究,2009(8):60-65.
[2]贺德方.完善专家咨询制度的对策建议[N].学习时报,2008-3-10(03).
[3]罗豪才,湛中乐.行政法学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012.
[4]赵万里,李艳红.专家体制与公共决策的技术—政治过程[J].自然辩证法研究,2009(11):79-83.
[5]朱伟.民意、知识和权力:政策制定过程中公众、专家与政府的互动模式研究[M].南京:南京大学出版社,2014.
[6]朱水成,潘知.政策议程理论综述[J].行政与法,2014(11):1-7.
[7]陈振明.政策科学—公共政策分析导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
[8][美]托马斯·R·戴伊.理解公共政策[M].北京:华夏出版社,2004.
[9][美]约翰·W·金登.议程、备选方案与公共政策[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
[10]宁骚.公共政策学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2014.
[11]王锡锌.我国公共决策专家咨询制度的悖论及其克服—以美国<联邦咨询委员会法>为借鉴[J].法商研究,2007(2):113-121.
[12]李卫华.专家参与行政:现状、取向与法律规范[J].新视野,2012(2):66-68.
[13]杨寅.行政决策程序、监督与责任制度[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2011.
[14]刘伟,黄健荣.当代中国政策议程创建模式嬗变分析[J].公共管理学报,2008(3):30-40.
[15]徐增辉,刘志光.政策议程设置的途径分析[J].学术研究,2009(8):60-65.