研究运用可视化根管技术治疗牙体牙髓病的临床价值
|
摘要
目的研究牙体牙髓病临床治疗中运用可视化根管技术的效果。方法 100例牙体牙髓病患者,按照治疗方式不同分为观察组及对照组,各50例。观察组应用可视化根管技术治疗,对照组应用传统根管技术治疗。比较两组治疗效果,手术用时、牙体组织损伤率、复诊次数,不良反应发生情况。结果观察组治疗成功率为92.00%,明显高于对照组的76.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组手术用时(72.65±11.78)min长于对照组的(43.51±9.64)min,牙体组织损伤率2.00%低于对照组的14.00%,复诊次数(2.32±1.18)次少于对照组的(4.75±1.42)次,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组治疗后不良反应发生率为8.00%,明显低于对照组的24.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论可视化根管技术治疗牙体牙髓病能够提升治疗成功率,缩短复诊次数,值得临床推广。
Objective To study the effect of visual root canal technique in the treatment of dental pulp disease. Methods A total of 100 patients with dental pulp disease were divided by different treatment methods into observation group and control group, with 50 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with visual root canal technique, and the control group was treated with traditional root canal technique. Comparison were made on treatment effect, operation time, dental tissue injury rate, number of follow-up visits and occurrence of adverse reactions between the two groups. Results The observation group had obviously higher treatment success rate as 92.00% than 76.00% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The observation group had longer operation time as(72.65±11.78) min than(43.51±9.64) min in the control group, lower dental tissue injury rate as 2.00% than 14.00% in the control group, and less number of follow-up visits as(2.32±1.18) times than(4.75±1.42) times in the control group. Their difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The observation group had obviously lower incidence of adverse reactions after treatment as 8.00% than 24.00% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Visual root canal technique can improve treatment success rate of dental pulp disease and reduce number of follow-up visits. It is worthy of clinical promotion.
Objective To study the effect of visual root canal technique in the treatment of dental pulp disease. Methods A total of 100 patients with dental pulp disease were divided by different treatment methods into observation group and control group, with 50 cases in each group. The observation group was treated with visual root canal technique, and the control group was treated with traditional root canal technique. Comparison were made on treatment effect, operation time, dental tissue injury rate, number of follow-up visits and occurrence of adverse reactions between the two groups. Results The observation group had obviously higher treatment success rate as 92.00% than 76.00% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The observation group had longer operation time as(72.65±11.78) min than(43.51±9.64) min in the control group, lower dental tissue injury rate as 2.00% than 14.00% in the control group, and less number of follow-up visits as(2.32±1.18) times than(4.75±1.42) times in the control group. Their difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). The observation group had obviously lower incidence of adverse reactions after treatment as 8.00% than 24.00% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Visual root canal technique can improve treatment success rate of dental pulp disease and reduce number of follow-up visits. It is worthy of clinical promotion.
引文
[1]李佳.多次法根管治疗与一次性根管治疗牙体牙髓病临床效果比较.全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2017, 4(5):34-35.
[2]高玉文,张大华,李艳丽.多次法根管治疗与一次性根管治疗牙体牙髓病临床效果评价.全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2017,4(16):21.
[3]赖盈盈,白石.一次根管治疗对牙体牙髓病患者症状改善情况的影响分析.医学理论与实践, 2016, 29(4):491-493.
[4]丁玉玲.多次根管疗法与一次性根管治疗牙体牙髓病的临床疗效研究.中外医疗, 2016, 35(14):104-105.
[5]陈超.一次根管法在牙体牙髓病患者中的临床效果及对咀嚼功能的影响研究.全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2016, 3(17):44-45.
[6]刘丽梅.多次性根管治疗与一次性根管治疗牙体牙髓病临床疗效对比观察.中国卫生标准管理, 2016, 7(16):75-76.
[7]周君.一次根管治疗对牙体牙髓病患者症状改善情况的影响分析.全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2017, 4(5):28-29.
[8]米海尔古丽·克力木,阿依古丽·阿合买提.牙体牙髓病行一次性治疗与多次根管治疗的有效性对比.中国继续医学教育,2016, 8(16):120-121.
[2]高玉文,张大华,李艳丽.多次法根管治疗与一次性根管治疗牙体牙髓病临床效果评价.全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2017,4(16):21.
[3]赖盈盈,白石.一次根管治疗对牙体牙髓病患者症状改善情况的影响分析.医学理论与实践, 2016, 29(4):491-493.
[4]丁玉玲.多次根管疗法与一次性根管治疗牙体牙髓病的临床疗效研究.中外医疗, 2016, 35(14):104-105.
[5]陈超.一次根管法在牙体牙髓病患者中的临床效果及对咀嚼功能的影响研究.全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2016, 3(17):44-45.
[6]刘丽梅.多次性根管治疗与一次性根管治疗牙体牙髓病临床疗效对比观察.中国卫生标准管理, 2016, 7(16):75-76.
[7]周君.一次根管治疗对牙体牙髓病患者症状改善情况的影响分析.全科口腔医学电子杂志, 2017, 4(5):28-29.
[8]米海尔古丽·克力木,阿依古丽·阿合买提.牙体牙髓病行一次性治疗与多次根管治疗的有效性对比.中国继续医学教育,2016, 8(16):120-121.