我国侵犯著作权罪的立法瓶颈与域外立法启示
|
摘要
我国通过相关司法解释降低侵犯著作权罪之入罪门槛,并对犯罪行为处以较以前更重的刑罚。但是,这并没有对侵犯著作权罪行为起到应有的震慑作用,犯罪仍呈现上升趋势。与之相比,域外国家和地区侵犯著作权罪入罪门槛低,侵权人受到刑事追诉并不多见。如何通过立法对侵犯著作权罪起到有效地遏制成为我国当前侵犯著作权罪立法必须要解决的重要课题。我国立法应当吸收和借鉴他国和地区先进的立法技术,对侵犯著作权罪实行告诉才处理的原则,并确立合理的犯罪既遂标准,改变现有的刑罚结构体系,不断完善我国侵犯著作权罪刑事立法体系。
Through relevant judicial interpretations, China reduces the threshold for the crime of copyright infringement, and gives more severe punishment to criminal acts. However, these do not have a deterrent effect on copyright crime, and crime is still on the rise. In contrast, the extraterritorial national and regional copyright crime threshold is low, and it is rare for the infringer to be prosecuted by criminal law. How to effectively curb copyright crime through legislation has become an important issue to be solved in China's current copyright crime legislation. The legislation of our country should absorb and learn from other countries and regions of the advanced legislative technology and useful experience, the implementation of the copyright crime that principle, and establish a reasonable standard of accomplishment of crime, the penalty structure change the existing system, and constantly improve the copyright criminal legislation system in china.
Through relevant judicial interpretations, China reduces the threshold for the crime of copyright infringement, and gives more severe punishment to criminal acts. However, these do not have a deterrent effect on copyright crime, and crime is still on the rise. In contrast, the extraterritorial national and regional copyright crime threshold is low, and it is rare for the infringer to be prosecuted by criminal law. How to effectively curb copyright crime through legislation has become an important issue to be solved in China's current copyright crime legislation. The legislation of our country should absorb and learn from other countries and regions of the advanced legislative technology and useful experience, the implementation of the copyright crime that principle, and establish a reasonable standard of accomplishment of crime, the penalty structure change the existing system, and constantly improve the copyright criminal legislation system in china.
引文
[1]张先明.中国法院知识产权司法保护状况(2010)[N].人民法院报,2011-04-20(1).
[2]杨青.中国法院知识产权司法保护状况(2016)[EB/OL].http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-42362.html.
[3]吴汉东.知识产权法学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:101.
[4]马洪涛,李江波.浅谈我国著作权的刑法保护[J].出版科学,2003(1):41-43.
[5]赵秉志,田宏杰.侵犯知识产权犯罪比较研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:84.
[6]崔汪卫.侵犯著作权罪未遂形态刍议[J].中国出版,2015(8):52-56.
[7]王启富,陶髦.法律辞海[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1998:123.
[8]高铭暄.中国刑法学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1989:169.
[9]赵秉志.中国知识产权的刑事法保护及对欧盟经验的借鉴[M].北京:法律出版社,2006:351.
[10][日]平野龙一.刑法总论I[M].东京:有斐阁,1972:47.
[11]陈兴良.本体刑法学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002:72.
[12]熊永明.亲告犯的谦抑价值之解读[J].中国刑事法杂志,2005(1):35.
[13]陈兴良.刑法谦抑的价值蕴含[J].现代法学,1996(3):23.
[14]林山田.经济犯罪与经济刑法[M].台北:三民书局,1981:104-105.
[15]赵秉志.田宏杰.侵犯知识产权犯罪比较研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:84.
[16][德]汉斯·海因里希·耶塞克,托马斯·魏根特.德国刑法教科书[M].徐久生,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2001:83.
(1)本文所言“侵犯著作权罪”系广义,包括侵犯著作权罪和销售侵权复制品罪等。
(1)Bright Tunes Music Corp v.Harrison’s Music Ltd.,420 F.Supp.177(S.D.N.Y.1976)。
[2]杨青.中国法院知识产权司法保护状况(2016)[EB/OL].http://www.court.gov.cn/zixun-xiangqing-42362.html.
[3]吴汉东.知识产权法学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2012:101.
[4]马洪涛,李江波.浅谈我国著作权的刑法保护[J].出版科学,2003(1):41-43.
[5]赵秉志,田宏杰.侵犯知识产权犯罪比较研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:84.
[6]崔汪卫.侵犯著作权罪未遂形态刍议[J].中国出版,2015(8):52-56.
[7]王启富,陶髦.法律辞海[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1998:123.
[8]高铭暄.中国刑法学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1989:169.
[9]赵秉志.中国知识产权的刑事法保护及对欧盟经验的借鉴[M].北京:法律出版社,2006:351.
[10][日]平野龙一.刑法总论I[M].东京:有斐阁,1972:47.
[11]陈兴良.本体刑法学[M].北京:商务印书馆,2002:72.
[12]熊永明.亲告犯的谦抑价值之解读[J].中国刑事法杂志,2005(1):35.
[13]陈兴良.刑法谦抑的价值蕴含[J].现代法学,1996(3):23.
[14]林山田.经济犯罪与经济刑法[M].台北:三民书局,1981:104-105.
[15]赵秉志.田宏杰.侵犯知识产权犯罪比较研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2004:84.
[16][德]汉斯·海因里希·耶塞克,托马斯·魏根特.德国刑法教科书[M].徐久生,译.北京:中国法制出版社,2001:83.
(1)本文所言“侵犯著作权罪”系广义,包括侵犯著作权罪和销售侵权复制品罪等。
(1)Bright Tunes Music Corp v.Harrison’s Music Ltd.,420 F.Supp.177(S.D.N.Y.1976)。