护理信息能力自评量表的修订及信效度评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Reliability and validity of Chinese version of self-assessment of nursing informatics competencies scale
  • 作者:余自娟 ; 张艳 ; 张倍 ; 张慧颖 ; 王荣华 ; 李宏洁 ; 赵敬 ; 杜灿灿
  • 英文作者:YU Zijuan;ZHANG Yan;ZHANG Beibei;ZHANG Huiying;WANG Ronghua;LI Hongjie;ZHAO Jing;DU Cancan;College of Nursing,Zhengzhou University;
  • 关键词:教育 ; 护理 ; 研究生 ; 护理信息能力 ; 信度 ; 效度
  • 英文关键词:education,nursing,graduate;;nursing informatics competencies;;reliability;;validity
  • 中文刊名:CQYX
  • 英文刊名:Chongqing Medicine
  • 机构:郑州大学护理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-28
  • 出版单位:重庆医学
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.48
  • 基金:第58批中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2015M582208)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CQYX201902022
  • 页数:4
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:50-1097/R
  • 分类号:92-95
摘要
目的汉化护理信息能力自评量表(SANICS)并检验其信效度。方法严格按照Brislin模型对SANICS进行翻译与回译、文化调适及预试验,形成中文版SANICS。后在124名在读护理硕士研究生中评价SANICS的信效度。结果中文版SANICS总量表Cronbach′sα系数为0.931,重测信度为0.883,内容效度0.950;提取5个公因子,每个条目在其公因子上的载荷值均大于0.4,累计贡献率70.659%。结论中文版SANICS具有良好的信效度。
        Objective To check the reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Self-Assessment of Nursing Informatics Competencies Scale(SANICS).Methods SANICS was translated and back translated,culturally adapted and pre-tested in strict accordance with Brislin model to form Chinese version of SANICS.The reliability and validity were evaluated in 124 postgraduate nursing students.Results The Cronbach′sαvalues of Chinese version of SANICS was 0.931,and the retest reliability was 0.883,the content validity was0.950.Five common factors were extracted and each item had a load value of>0.4 on its common factor.The accumulative rate was 70.659%.Conclusion The Chinese version of SANICS had good reliability and validity.
引文
[1]O′CONNOR S,HUBNER U,SHAW T,et al.Time for TIGER to ROAR!Technology informatics guiding education reform[J].Nurse Educ Today,2017,58:78-81.
    [2]SHERWOOD G,NICKEL B.Integrating quality and safety competencies to improve outcomes:application in infusion therapy practice[J].J Infus Nurs,2017,40(2):116-122.
    [3]张博论,郭明娟.跌倒预防护理信息系统的设计与应用[J].中国护理管理,2013,13(12):32-33.
    [4]STAGGERS N,GASSERT C A,CURRAN C.Informatics competencies for nurses at four levels of practice[J].JNurs Educ,2001,40(7):303-316.
    [5]石贞仙,张博论,李琳,等.培训新护理时代的护理信息尖兵[J].中国护理管理,2016,16(5):696-699.
    [6]TARYN H,DEE M,KATHLEEN M,et al.An instrument for assessing advanced nursing informatics competencies[J].J Nurs Educ Prac,2014,4(7):104-113.
    [7]YOON S,YEN P Y,BAKKEN S.Psychometric properties of the self-assessment of nursing informatics competencies scale[J].Stud Health Technol Inform,2009,146:546-550.
    [8]CHOI J,BAKKEN S.Validation of the self-assessment of nursing informatics competencies scale among undergraduate and graduate nursing students[J].J Nurs Educ,2013,52(5):275-282.
    [9]VALMI D S,TRANSLATION W R.Translation,adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research:a clear and userfriendly guideline[J].J Eval Clin Pract,2011,17(2):268-274.
    [10]郭金玉,李峥.量表引进的过程及评价标准[J].中华护理杂志,2012,47(3):283-285.
    [11]WALTZ C F,STRICKLAND O L,LENZ E R.Measurement in nursing and health research[M].3rd ed.New York:Springer Publishing,2005.
    [12]方积乾.生存质量测定方法及应用[M].北京:北京医科大学出版社,2000:53-61.
    [13]吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:科学出版社,2003:12-119.