自家眼光与文史哲的融贯——张晶学术文选《美学与诗学》之启示
|
摘要
从"新启蒙"到"国学复兴"、从"学术反思"到"学术自觉",近四十年文化学术之繁盛与成就堪值总结。立足于学术史的角度,将宏观观照与微观研究相结合,以张晶先生的学术建树为个案进行了深入梳理。当今学术之进阶,一方面有赖于时代、社会、文化生态,另一方面也与众多学者的推动分不开。正是在这点上,张晶先生的美学与诗学研究及其方法探索凸显自家意义,其"文史哲"融贯的学术理路尤给我们以启示。
From the "New Enlightenment" to the "Rejuvenation of Sinology", and from "Academic introspection" to "Academic self-consciousness", the prosperity of culture and learning in the past four decades should be summarized. Based on the perspective of academic history, this paper combines macro view with microcosmic research, and takes Mr. Zhang Jing's academic achievements as a case to comb. On the one hand, the advancement of scholarship depends on the times, the society and the cultural ecology. On the other hand, it is also inseparable from the promotion of many scholars. In this context, Zhang jing's research and methods on aesthetics and poetics made his research prominent. His academic logic of achieving mastery through a comprehensive study of philosophy, literary and history especially enlightened us a lot.
From the "New Enlightenment" to the "Rejuvenation of Sinology", and from "Academic introspection" to "Academic self-consciousness", the prosperity of culture and learning in the past four decades should be summarized. Based on the perspective of academic history, this paper combines macro view with microcosmic research, and takes Mr. Zhang Jing's academic achievements as a case to comb. On the one hand, the advancement of scholarship depends on the times, the society and the cultural ecology. On the other hand, it is also inseparable from the promotion of many scholars. In this context, Zhang jing's research and methods on aesthetics and poetics made his research prominent. His academic logic of achieving mastery through a comprehensive study of philosophy, literary and history especially enlightened us a lot.
引文
[1]张晶.美学与诗学——张晶学术文选:第1卷[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2017.
[2]蒋寅,朱易安.《唐诗学史论稿》读后[J].文学评论,2004(3):179.
[3]张晶.辽金诗史[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,1994.
[4]张晶.辽金元诗歌史论[M].长春:吉林教育出版社,1995.
[5]邓绍基.辽金诗学思想研究·序[M]//.张晶.辽金诗学思想研究.沈阳:辽海出版社,2004.
[6]张晶.中国古代文学通论:辽金元卷[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,2005.
[7]张晶.中国诗歌通史:辽金元卷[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2012.
[8]胡晓明.中国诗学之精神[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2001.
[9]张伯伟.中国诗学研究[M].沈阳:辽海出版社,2000.
[10]陈良运.中国诗学批评史[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2007.
[11]杨义.从文化原我到文化通观[J].文学评论,2003(4):47-56.
[12]党圣元.中国古代文论的范畴和体系[J].文学评论,1997(1):15-25.
[13]蒲震元.历史还原?现代阐释与理论创新——中国古代文论及美学研究方法浅议[J].现代传播,2005(5):13-15.
[14]涂光社.古代文论范畴研究的升堂入室[J].中国图书评论,1999(12):28-29.
[15]周兴陆,葛传彬,史红伟.新世纪之初古代文论研究的思考[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2000(6):66-73.ZHOU Xinglu,GE Chuanbin,SHI Hongwei.Reflection on the Study of Ancient Literary Theory at the Beginning of the New Century[J].Fudan Journal(Social Science Edition),2000(6):66-73.
[16]张晶.美学与诗学——张晶学术文选:第2卷[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2017.
[17]张晶.神思——艺术的精灵[M].南昌:百花洲文艺出版社,2006.
[18]张晶.美学的延展[M].北京:商务印书馆,2006.
[19]张晶,杜寒风.文艺学的开拓空间[M].北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2006.
[20]张晶.审美之思[M].北京:北京广播学院出版社,2002.
[21]张晶.艺术美学论[M].北京.中国文联出版社,2012.
[22]鲍姆嘉通.美学[M].简明,王旭晓,译.北京:文化艺术出版社,1987.
[23]左东岭.中国文学思想史的学术理念与研究方法——罗宗强先生学术思想述论[J].文学评论,2004(3):172-173.
[2]蒋寅,朱易安.《唐诗学史论稿》读后[J].文学评论,2004(3):179.
[3]张晶.辽金诗史[M].长春:东北师范大学出版社,1994.
[4]张晶.辽金元诗歌史论[M].长春:吉林教育出版社,1995.
[5]邓绍基.辽金诗学思想研究·序[M]//.张晶.辽金诗学思想研究.沈阳:辽海出版社,2004.
[6]张晶.中国古代文学通论:辽金元卷[M].沈阳:辽宁人民出版社,2005.
[7]张晶.中国诗歌通史:辽金元卷[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2012.
[8]胡晓明.中国诗学之精神[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2001.
[9]张伯伟.中国诗学研究[M].沈阳:辽海出版社,2000.
[10]陈良运.中国诗学批评史[M].南昌:江西人民出版社,2007.
[11]杨义.从文化原我到文化通观[J].文学评论,2003(4):47-56.
[12]党圣元.中国古代文论的范畴和体系[J].文学评论,1997(1):15-25.
[13]蒲震元.历史还原?现代阐释与理论创新——中国古代文论及美学研究方法浅议[J].现代传播,2005(5):13-15.
[14]涂光社.古代文论范畴研究的升堂入室[J].中国图书评论,1999(12):28-29.
[15]周兴陆,葛传彬,史红伟.新世纪之初古代文论研究的思考[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2000(6):66-73.ZHOU Xinglu,GE Chuanbin,SHI Hongwei.Reflection on the Study of Ancient Literary Theory at the Beginning of the New Century[J].Fudan Journal(Social Science Edition),2000(6):66-73.
[16]张晶.美学与诗学——张晶学术文选:第2卷[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2017.
[17]张晶.神思——艺术的精灵[M].南昌:百花洲文艺出版社,2006.
[18]张晶.美学的延展[M].北京:商务印书馆,2006.
[19]张晶,杜寒风.文艺学的开拓空间[M].北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2006.
[20]张晶.审美之思[M].北京:北京广播学院出版社,2002.
[21]张晶.艺术美学论[M].北京.中国文联出版社,2012.
[22]鲍姆嘉通.美学[M].简明,王旭晓,译.北京:文化艺术出版社,1987.
[23]左东岭.中国文学思想史的学术理念与研究方法——罗宗强先生学术思想述论[J].文学评论,2004(3):172-173.