大学图书馆馆藏质量评价方法探究——以部分高校本草类馆藏图书实证探究为例
|
摘要
文章采用层次分析法,以开设中药学类专业部分高校图书馆本草类馆藏图书作为实证探究数据,通过书目数据核对、引文分析、文献及借阅数量统计、读者问卷等形式对馆藏质量进行评价与分析,计算出辽宁中医药大学图书馆本草类馆藏图书质量评价分数。旨在采用层次分析法构建图书馆馆藏质量评价指标体系,探究定期进行馆藏质量评价,全面、客观掌握馆藏特点及学科保障情况和读者阅读需求满足程度的可行方法。
In this article, analytic hierarchy process(AHP) was adopted and books collection of herbal category in colleges and universities with TCM major was set as data for empirical study. The quality of book collection was evaluated and analyzed through bibliographic data check, citation analysis, literature and loan statistics, and reader questionnaire. The evaluation score of books collection of herbal category quality of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine was calculated. The aim was to use AHP to construct collection quality evaluation index system of the library books collection quality, explore the regular collection quality evaluation, comprehensively and objectively grasp the characteristics and discipline security and feasible methods to meet the needs of readers.
In this article, analytic hierarchy process(AHP) was adopted and books collection of herbal category in colleges and universities with TCM major was set as data for empirical study. The quality of book collection was evaluated and analyzed through bibliographic data check, citation analysis, literature and loan statistics, and reader questionnaire. The evaluation score of books collection of herbal category quality of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine was calculated. The aim was to use AHP to construct collection quality evaluation index system of the library books collection quality, explore the regular collection quality evaluation, comprehensively and objectively grasp the characteristics and discipline security and feasible methods to meet the needs of readers.
引文
[1]贾宝霞.大学图书馆馆藏质量评价方法的比较研究——以东北大学专业类馆藏的实证研究为例[J].图书情报知识,2013(4):124-128.
[2]朱慧灵.馆藏质量评价方法之比较——以心理学类学术图书为例[J].图书馆杂志,2013(4):61-64.
[3]安月英.基于层次分析法的数字馆藏评价指标体系[J].图书馆,2008(4):82-84.
[4]赵良英,李立华,李沂濛.基于多层次模糊综合评价的复合图书馆信息资源评价指标体系研究[J].图书馆工作与研究,2011(3):24-28.
[5]王寒冰.大学图书馆馆藏资源质量评价指标研究[J].农业图书情报学刊,2017,29(2):42-46.
[6]LUTHER J.University investment in the library:What's the Return?A case study at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign(2008)[EB/OL].[2014-01-15].http://www.docin.com/p-70790560.html.
[7]王频.高校图书馆文献服务成本效益分析——以成都大学图书馆为例[J].成都大学学报(社会科学版),2014(3):122-124.
[8]杜占江,王金娜,肖丹.构建基于德尔菲法与层次分析法的文献信息资源评价指标体系[J].现代情报,2011,31(10):9-14.
[2]朱慧灵.馆藏质量评价方法之比较——以心理学类学术图书为例[J].图书馆杂志,2013(4):61-64.
[3]安月英.基于层次分析法的数字馆藏评价指标体系[J].图书馆,2008(4):82-84.
[4]赵良英,李立华,李沂濛.基于多层次模糊综合评价的复合图书馆信息资源评价指标体系研究[J].图书馆工作与研究,2011(3):24-28.
[5]王寒冰.大学图书馆馆藏资源质量评价指标研究[J].农业图书情报学刊,2017,29(2):42-46.
[6]LUTHER J.University investment in the library:What's the Return?A case study at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign(2008)[EB/OL].[2014-01-15].http://www.docin.com/p-70790560.html.
[7]王频.高校图书馆文献服务成本效益分析——以成都大学图书馆为例[J].成都大学学报(社会科学版),2014(3):122-124.
[8]杜占江,王金娜,肖丹.构建基于德尔菲法与层次分析法的文献信息资源评价指标体系[J].现代情报,2011,31(10):9-14.