不同地理种群鸭跖草Commelina communis L.对莠去津的耐受性
|
摘要
鸭跖草是我国常见杂草,目前已成为农田难除杂草之一。生产实践中,莠去津对玉米田鸭跖草的防效已有所降低。2016-2017年,为了探讨鸭跖草不同地理种群对莠去津的耐受性,采用莠去津单剂量甄别方法,从黑龙江、吉林、辽宁、河北、江苏、浙江、湖北和贵州8个省份采集46个鸭跖草种群,进行了其对莠去津的耐受性初筛试验。在此基础上,选择7个不同地理来源的代表性种群,研究其对莠去津的敏感性差异,结果显示:种群JS-10、HB-3和HB-6对莠去津敏感,GR_(50)分别为122.21、153.27 g/hm~2和158.13 g/hm~2;种群JL-13、HLJ-2、JL-7和JL-1对莠去津耐受性相对较强,GR_(50)分别为273.98、277.29、374.68 g/hm~2和379.57 g/hm~2。以上结果表明,不同地理种群鸭跖草对莠去津的耐受水平存在差异,从地理分布上呈由南向北耐受水平增加的趋势。各地理种群对莠去津的耐受性差异可能与不同地区莠去津的使用年限、使用剂量和使用频度相关。
Commelina communis is a common weed that has become troublesome in farmland in China. It is observed in the field that atrazine failed to control C. communis in some regions. In order to investigate the tolerance of C. communis to atrazine, 46 populations were collected from 8 provinces, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Hebei, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Hubei and Guizhou, and the tolerance degree of C. communis populations was determined using whole-plant dose-response experiment. The results showed that the population JS-10, HB-3 and HB-6 were susceptible to atrazine with GR_(50) values of 122.21 g/hm~2, 153.27 g/hm~2 and 158.13 g/hm~2, respectively, while the population JL-13, HLJ-2, JL-7 and JL-1 showed relative tolerance with GR_(50) values of 273.98 g/hm~2, 277.29 g/hm~2, 374.68 g/hm~2 and 379.57 g/hm~2, respectively. It indicated that the degree of atrazine tolerance varied among the populations of C. communis, and the populations from southern China were sensitive while those from northern China were relatively tolerant. The results might be related to the using history, dosage and the application frequency of atrazine in different regions of China.
Commelina communis is a common weed that has become troublesome in farmland in China. It is observed in the field that atrazine failed to control C. communis in some regions. In order to investigate the tolerance of C. communis to atrazine, 46 populations were collected from 8 provinces, Heilongjiang, Jilin, Liaoning, Hebei, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Hubei and Guizhou, and the tolerance degree of C. communis populations was determined using whole-plant dose-response experiment. The results showed that the population JS-10, HB-3 and HB-6 were susceptible to atrazine with GR_(50) values of 122.21 g/hm~2, 153.27 g/hm~2 and 158.13 g/hm~2, respectively, while the population JL-13, HLJ-2, JL-7 and JL-1 showed relative tolerance with GR_(50) values of 273.98 g/hm~2, 277.29 g/hm~2, 374.68 g/hm~2 and 379.57 g/hm~2, respectively. It indicated that the degree of atrazine tolerance varied among the populations of C. communis, and the populations from southern China were sensitive while those from northern China were relatively tolerant. The results might be related to the using history, dosage and the application frequency of atrazine in different regions of China.
引文
[1] 李扬汉.中国杂草志[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1998.
[2] MISHRA J S, SINGH V P, YADURAJU N T. Interference of common dayflower (Commelina communis L.) in soybean (Glycine max L.)[J]. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 2002, 34(3): 295-296.
[3] 胡凡,付迎春,朴英,等.鸭跖草生物学特性及与大豆竞争关系的研究[J].大豆科学,2003,22(3):230-233.
[4] 马红,关成宏,陶波.不同叶龄鸭跖草对咪唑乙烟酸的耐药性差异及生理基础研究[J].中国油料作物学报,2010,32(1):136-138.
[5] 李向勇,陶波,李英慧,等.黑龙江省六个地点鸭跖草RAPD遗传多样性分析[J].作物杂志,2008,20(2):21-25.
[6] 由立新,赵长山,李林海,等.鸭跖草生物学特性的研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2002,25(1):21-23.
[7] ALBRIGHT V C, MURPHY I J, ANDERSON J A, et al. Fate of atrazine in switchgrass-soil column system [J]. Chemosphere, 2013, 90(6): 1847-1853.
[8] 司友斌,孟雪梅.除草剂阿特拉津的环境行为及其生态修复研究进展[J].安徽农业大学学报,2007,34(3):451-455.
[9] GUNTHER F A, GUNTHER J D. Single pesticide volume: The triazine herbicides [M]. New York: Springer, 1970, 32: 1-9.
[10] JIANG Zhao, MA Bingbing, ERINLE K O, et al. Enzymatic antioxidant defense in resistant plant: Pennisetum americanum (L.)K. Schum during long-term atrazine exposure [J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2016, 133: 59-66.
[11] EVANS A F, O’BRIEN S R, MA Rong, et al. Biochemical characterization of metabolism-based atrazine resistance in Amaranthus tuberculatus and identification of an expressed GST associated with resistance[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017, 15(10): 1238-1249.
[12] SVYANTEK A W, ALDAHIR P, CHEN Shu, et al. Target and nontarget resistance mechanisms induce annual bluegrass (Poa annua) resistance to atrazine, amicarbazone, and diuron[J]. Weed Technology, 2016, 30(3): 773-782.
[13] 马兵兵,姜昭,ERINLE K O,等.狼尾草根系对阿特拉津长期胁迫的氧化应激响应[J].生态毒理学报,2016,11(6):214-222.
[14] 王庆海,李翠,陈超,等.芦苇对阿特拉津胁迫的生理响应及其与耐受性的关系[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(10):1968-1977.
[15] 李翠,温海峰,郑瑞伦,等.阿特拉津胁迫对菖蒲的生理毒性效应[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,35(10):1895-1902.
[16] 李学宏.恶性杂草鸭跖草的危害与防除[J].陕西农业科学,2012,58(4):266-267.
[17] 马红,关成宏,陶波.不同叶龄鸭跖草对咪唑乙烟酸的耐药性[J].植物保护学报,2009,36(5):450-454.
[18] SANTIAGO M U, MICHEAL D K. Response of Asiatic dayflower (Commelina communis) to glyphosate and alternatives in soybean [J]. Weed Science, 2009, 57(1): 74-80.
[19] 苏少泉.莠去津特性与使用中的问题[J].农药研究与应用,2010,14(3):1-5.
[20] 弓爱君,叶常明.除草剂阿特拉津(atrazine)的环境行为综述[J].环境工程学报,1997,5(2):37-47.
[21] HEAP I. The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds [EB]. (2018-03-06) http://www.weedscience.org.
[22] POWLES S B, YU Qin. Evolution in action: plants resistant to herbicides [J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2010, 61: 317-347.
[2] MISHRA J S, SINGH V P, YADURAJU N T. Interference of common dayflower (Commelina communis L.) in soybean (Glycine max L.)[J]. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 2002, 34(3): 295-296.
[3] 胡凡,付迎春,朴英,等.鸭跖草生物学特性及与大豆竞争关系的研究[J].大豆科学,2003,22(3):230-233.
[4] 马红,关成宏,陶波.不同叶龄鸭跖草对咪唑乙烟酸的耐药性差异及生理基础研究[J].中国油料作物学报,2010,32(1):136-138.
[5] 李向勇,陶波,李英慧,等.黑龙江省六个地点鸭跖草RAPD遗传多样性分析[J].作物杂志,2008,20(2):21-25.
[6] 由立新,赵长山,李林海,等.鸭跖草生物学特性的研究[J].黑龙江农业科学,2002,25(1):21-23.
[7] ALBRIGHT V C, MURPHY I J, ANDERSON J A, et al. Fate of atrazine in switchgrass-soil column system [J]. Chemosphere, 2013, 90(6): 1847-1853.
[8] 司友斌,孟雪梅.除草剂阿特拉津的环境行为及其生态修复研究进展[J].安徽农业大学学报,2007,34(3):451-455.
[9] GUNTHER F A, GUNTHER J D. Single pesticide volume: The triazine herbicides [M]. New York: Springer, 1970, 32: 1-9.
[10] JIANG Zhao, MA Bingbing, ERINLE K O, et al. Enzymatic antioxidant defense in resistant plant: Pennisetum americanum (L.)K. Schum during long-term atrazine exposure [J]. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2016, 133: 59-66.
[11] EVANS A F, O’BRIEN S R, MA Rong, et al. Biochemical characterization of metabolism-based atrazine resistance in Amaranthus tuberculatus and identification of an expressed GST associated with resistance[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017, 15(10): 1238-1249.
[12] SVYANTEK A W, ALDAHIR P, CHEN Shu, et al. Target and nontarget resistance mechanisms induce annual bluegrass (Poa annua) resistance to atrazine, amicarbazone, and diuron[J]. Weed Technology, 2016, 30(3): 773-782.
[13] 马兵兵,姜昭,ERINLE K O,等.狼尾草根系对阿特拉津长期胁迫的氧化应激响应[J].生态毒理学报,2016,11(6):214-222.
[14] 王庆海,李翠,陈超,等.芦苇对阿特拉津胁迫的生理响应及其与耐受性的关系[J].农业环境科学学报,2017,36(10):1968-1977.
[15] 李翠,温海峰,郑瑞伦,等.阿特拉津胁迫对菖蒲的生理毒性效应[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,35(10):1895-1902.
[16] 李学宏.恶性杂草鸭跖草的危害与防除[J].陕西农业科学,2012,58(4):266-267.
[17] 马红,关成宏,陶波.不同叶龄鸭跖草对咪唑乙烟酸的耐药性[J].植物保护学报,2009,36(5):450-454.
[18] SANTIAGO M U, MICHEAL D K. Response of Asiatic dayflower (Commelina communis) to glyphosate and alternatives in soybean [J]. Weed Science, 2009, 57(1): 74-80.
[19] 苏少泉.莠去津特性与使用中的问题[J].农药研究与应用,2010,14(3):1-5.
[20] 弓爱君,叶常明.除草剂阿特拉津(atrazine)的环境行为综述[J].环境工程学报,1997,5(2):37-47.
[21] HEAP I. The international survey of herbicide resistant weeds [EB]. (2018-03-06) http://www.weedscience.org.
[22] POWLES S B, YU Qin. Evolution in action: plants resistant to herbicides [J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2010, 61: 317-347.