货币政策调控与宏观经济波动:基于ARDL-ECM模型的实证分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Regulation of Monetary Policy and Fluctuation of Macro-economy:A Positive Analysis Based on the Model of ARDL-ECM
  • 作者:朱万里 ; 郑周胜
  • 英文作者:Zhu Wanli;Zheng Zhousheng;Longqiao College of Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics;Lanzhou Central Branch of the People's Bank of China;
  • 关键词:货币供应量 ; 利率 ; 通货膨胀率 ; 资产收益率 ; 宏观经济波动 ; ARDL-ECM
  • 英文关键词:money supply;;interest rate;;the rate of inflation;;the return on assets;;fluctuation of macro-economy;;ARDL-ECM
  • 中文刊名:DJGL
  • 英文刊名:Contemporary Economic Management
  • 机构:兰州财经大学陇桥学院;中国人民银行兰州中心支行;
  • 出版日期:2018-01-16 13:43
  • 出版单位:当代经济管理
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.40;No.280
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:DJGL201806015
  • 页数:6
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:13-1356/F
  • 分类号:98-103
摘要
结合Sidrauski研究,建立货币政策调控对宏观经济影响的微观传导模型,基于ARDL-ECM模型,利用2008~2016年的月频数据,检验金融危机爆发以来我国货币政策调控对宏观经济波动的影响。研究结果表明:从长期来看,宏观经济波动不仅与货币供应量、利率存在协整关系,而且与消费物价指数、资本市场价格之间密切相关;从短期来看,宏观经济波动主要受到货币供应量、消费物价指数影响,利率的影响并不显著。最后,从加强货币供应量管理、推进利率市场化改革、关注消费物价与资本市场价格波动等方面提出加强货币政策调控、促进宏观经济平稳运行的建议。
        This article sets up a micro-transmission model about the influence of monetary policy regulation on macro-economy combined with Sidrauski study. Based on ARDL-ECM model, using monthly data from 2008 to 2016, the influence of monetary policy regulation to macro-economy since the financial crisis is tested. The results indicate : In the long run, there are co-integration relationship between the fluctuation of macro-economy and money supply, interest rate, consumer's price index and capital market price; in the short run, the fluctuation of macro-economy is affected by money supply and consumer's price index. Interest rate has no significant influence on it. Finally, we propose the advice to strengthen the regu-lation of monetary policy and promote the smooth operation of the macro-economy from the aspects of strengthening management of money supply,pushing on the reform of interest market, paying close attention to the fluctuation of consumer's price and Capital market price.
引文
[1]刘晓倩,王元月.货币供应量、财政指出对GDP的冲击效应研究[J].统计与决策,2012(17):163-165.
    [2]张金城.货币政策调控、流动性管理与宏观经济稳定[J].国际金融研究,2014(3):4-20.
    [3]刘轶,王刚,李旭彪.贷款冲击、货币供给冲击和宏观经济波动[J].湖南大学学报,2016(7):100-106.
    [4]奚君羊,贺云松.中国货币政策的福利损失及中介目标的选择——基于新凯恩斯DSGE模型的分析[J].财经研究,2010(2):89-98.
    [5]金中夏,洪浩,李宏瑾.利率市场化对货币政策有效性与经济结构调整的影响[J].经济研究,2013(4):69-82.
    [6]李琼,王志伟.泰勒规则与中国宏观经济波动———1994-2006的实证检验[J].经济科学,2009(2):9-22.
    [7]王彬.财政政策、货币政策调控与宏观经济稳定——基于新凯恩斯主义垄断竞争模型的分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2010(11):3-18.
    [8]Sidrauski.Rational Choice and Patterns of Growth in a Monetary Economy[J].American Economic Review,1967,57(2):534-544.
    [9]Pesaran.Microfit 4.0[M].Oxford University Press,Oxford,1997.
    [10]Pesaran,Shin,Smith.Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships[J].Journal of Applied Econometrics,2001(16):289-326.
    [11]刘达禹,刘金全,赵婷婷.经济周期与规则型货币政策的动态关联机制研究——基于中国典型经济波动阶段的经验证据[J].经济评论,2017(2):48-61.
    [12]杨源源,张晓林,于津平.异质性预期、宏观经济波动与货币政策有效性——来自数量型和价格型工具的双重检验[J].国际金融研究,2017(9):25-34.