体检人群中平和质与偏颇质的心理状况比较
|
摘要
目的:探究体检人群不同中医体质分型的心理状况差异。方法:将中日友好医院体检人群1843人,使用《中医体质量表》、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、症状自评量表(SCL-90)进行自评,并剔除缺失数据,依据《中医体质量表》将人群分为平和质组与偏颇质组,探究2组SAS、SDS、SCL-90量表评分差异及其与心理状态严重程度的相关性。结果:偏颇质人群SCL-90总分及各因子、SAS、SDS评分均显著高于平和质人群(均P<0.01),偏颇质人群SAS、SDS、SCL-90评分等级显著高于平和质人群(均P<0.01)。结论 :偏颇质人群焦虑、抑郁及躯体症状程度较平和质人群明显增高。
Objective:To explore the differences of the psychological status between normal-constitution and lopsided-constitution among medical examination population.Methods:We arranged a total of 1843 population who had medical examination in China-Japan Friendship Hospital for a self-evaluation.Constitution in Chinese Medicine Questionnaire(CCMQ),self-rating anxiety scale(SAS),self-rating depression scale(SDS),and symptom checklist 90(SCL-90)Questionnaire were adopted,and the missing data were excluded.The population was divided into normal-constitution group and lopsided-constitution group according to the results of CCMQ for exploring the differences of SAS,SDS,SCL-90 scales and the relationship of difference severity between the two groups.Results:The scores of both SCL-90 and its various factors,SAS and SDS in lopsided-constitution group were significantly higher than those in normal-constitution(P<0.01).Conclusion:The severity of anxiety,depression and physical symptoms of the population with lopsided-constitution were significantly higher than those with normal-constitution.
Objective:To explore the differences of the psychological status between normal-constitution and lopsided-constitution among medical examination population.Methods:We arranged a total of 1843 population who had medical examination in China-Japan Friendship Hospital for a self-evaluation.Constitution in Chinese Medicine Questionnaire(CCMQ),self-rating anxiety scale(SAS),self-rating depression scale(SDS),and symptom checklist 90(SCL-90)Questionnaire were adopted,and the missing data were excluded.The population was divided into normal-constitution group and lopsided-constitution group according to the results of CCMQ for exploring the differences of SAS,SDS,SCL-90 scales and the relationship of difference severity between the two groups.Results:The scores of both SCL-90 and its various factors,SAS and SDS in lopsided-constitution group were significantly higher than those in normal-constitution(P<0.01).Conclusion:The severity of anxiety,depression and physical symptoms of the population with lopsided-constitution were significantly higher than those with normal-constitution.
引文
[1]王琦.中医体质学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.2-45.
[2]中华中医药学会.中医体质分类与判定[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2009.1-7.
[3]戴晓阳.常用心理评估量表手册[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2011.13-18.
[4]陈树林,李凌江.SCL-90信度效度检验和常模的再比较[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2003,5:323-327.
[5]孙振晓,刘化学,焦林瑛,等.两种抑郁自评量表对心血管疾病患者抑郁症状评定的一致性研究[J].中华临床医学杂志(电子版),2016,10(23):3535-3537.
[6]彭慧,张一英,季莹,等.农村地区女性自评抑郁量表中文版的信度效度分析[J].上海医药,2013,34(14):20-23.
[7]孙振晓,刘化学,焦林瑛,等.SAS和HADS-A对心血管疾病患者焦虑症状评定结果比较[J].四川精神卫生,2016,29(4):357-359.
[8]常兴,张恬,孟庆岩,等.基于“形神一体观”的中医对疾病的治疗观探析[J].时珍国医国药,2018,29(5):1155-1157.
[2]中华中医药学会.中医体质分类与判定[M].北京:中国中医药出版社,2009.1-7.
[3]戴晓阳.常用心理评估量表手册[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2011.13-18.
[4]陈树林,李凌江.SCL-90信度效度检验和常模的再比较[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2003,5:323-327.
[5]孙振晓,刘化学,焦林瑛,等.两种抑郁自评量表对心血管疾病患者抑郁症状评定的一致性研究[J].中华临床医学杂志(电子版),2016,10(23):3535-3537.
[6]彭慧,张一英,季莹,等.农村地区女性自评抑郁量表中文版的信度效度分析[J].上海医药,2013,34(14):20-23.
[7]孙振晓,刘化学,焦林瑛,等.SAS和HADS-A对心血管疾病患者焦虑症状评定结果比较[J].四川精神卫生,2016,29(4):357-359.
[8]常兴,张恬,孟庆岩,等.基于“形神一体观”的中医对疾病的治疗观探析[J].时珍国医国药,2018,29(5):1155-1157.