基于场域交互的产学研知识互补动态演化过程研究
|
摘要
知识互补的实现效果决定了产学研协同创新的成败。首先从动态视角界定产学研知识互补的内涵,基于场理论和知识的维度划分构建知识互补过程中的场域交互模型,提出场域交互是知识互补的基本实现方式;再将产学研知识互补分为局部互补和整体互补两个递进过程,通过自组织理论和BS模型分别阐述两个阶段的内在运行机理,系统刻画基于场域交互的产学研知识互补动态演化过程。
The realization effect of knowledge complementarity is the key to industry-university-research institute(IUR) collaborative innovation. This paper first defines the connotation of knowledge complementarity in the background of IUR collaborative innovation from a dynamic perspective. Based on the theory of "Ba" and the knowledge dimension division, the Ba's interaction model in the complementary process is constructed, and the interaction of "Ba" is the basic realization method of knowledge complementarity. And then, the knowledge complementarity of IUR is divided into two progressive processes: the partial complementarity and the overall complementarity. Through the self-organization theory and the BS model, the internal operation mechanism of the two stages is described respectively, and the dynamic evolution process of the knowledge complementarity based on the interaction of "Ba" is comprehensively depicted.
The realization effect of knowledge complementarity is the key to industry-university-research institute(IUR) collaborative innovation. This paper first defines the connotation of knowledge complementarity in the background of IUR collaborative innovation from a dynamic perspective. Based on the theory of "Ba" and the knowledge dimension division, the Ba's interaction model in the complementary process is constructed, and the interaction of "Ba" is the basic realization method of knowledge complementarity. And then, the knowledge complementarity of IUR is divided into two progressive processes: the partial complementarity and the overall complementarity. Through the self-organization theory and the BS model, the internal operation mechanism of the two stages is described respectively, and the dynamic evolution process of the knowledge complementarity based on the interaction of "Ba" is comprehensively depicted.
引文
[1]赵哲.高校与企业、科研院所协同创新的机制障碍与对策:以辽宁省高校为例[J].高校教育管理,2014,8(2):49-53.
[2]汪丁丁.知识经济的制度背景:“知识经济”批判[J].战略与管理,2000(2):66-76.
[3]KIM K,SHIN H,LEE M.The influence of partner knowledge complementarities on the effectiveness of it outsourcing[J].Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce,2010,20(3):213-233.
[4]KYUNG K K,NANRAYAN S U,JOO Y K,et al.Knowledge complementarity and knowledge exchange in supply channel relationships[J].International Journal of Information Management,2012(32):35-49.
[5]李煜华,谭金艳,胡瑶瑛.基于BP神经网络的创意产业集群知识互补度评价[J].统计与决策,2012(14):46-48.
[6]CASSIMAN B,VEUGELERS R.In search of complementarity in the innovation strategy:internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition[J].Management Science,2006,52(1):68-82.
[7]BAUM J A C,ANDREW S,TIM R.Where do small worlds come from?[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2003,12(4):697-725.
[8]李盛竹,付小红.促进知识互补效应的我国产学研合作科研创新激励机制研究[J].科学管理研究,2014,32(3):52-55.
[9]涂振洲,顾新.基于知识流动的产学研协同创新过程研究[J].科学学研究,2013,31(9):1381-1390.
[10]韩蓉,林润辉.基于自组织临界性理论的知识创新涌现分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(4):74-79.
[11]NONAKA I,TOYAMA R,KONNO N.SECI,Ba and leadership:a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation[J].Long Range Planning,2000,33(1):5-34.
[12]NONAKA I.A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation[J].Organization Science,1994,5(1):14-37.
[13]CREPLET F.The concept of‘Ba’:a new path the study of knowledge firms[J].European Journal of Economic and Social Systems,2000,14(4):365-379.
[14]孟潇,张庆普.跨组织科研合作中知识协同过程模型研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(12):130-137.
[15]NONAKA I,KODAVIA M,HIROSE A.Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation:a new paradigm for organizational theory[J].European Management Journal,2014,32:137-116.
[16]SZULANSKI G.Exploring internal stickiness:impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J].Strategie Management Journal,1996,17(S2):27-43.
[17]AKIRA T.Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor:the case of automotive product development[J].Organization Science,2002,13(3):321-338.
[18]王兴元,姬志恒.基于知识分类的跨学科交叉创新组织机制研究[J].理论学刊,2012(11):52-56.
[19]李涛,李敏.基于知识分类的知识创新路径分析[J].科技管理研究,2010(22):182-185.
[20]赵国杰,郝文升.知识生成转化的三层嵌切球与Ba/巴交互作用模型建构[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(6):77-84.
[21]AMASON A C.Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making:resolsing a paradox for top management teams[J].Academy of Management Jonmal,1996,39(1):123-148.
[22]於崇文.地质作用的自组织临界过程动力学:地质系统在混沌边缘分形生长[J].地学前缘,2000,7(1):13-42.
[23]贾武,范文涛,丁义明.自组织临界性模型:Bak-Sneppen模型的研究进展及其展望[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006(12):1-8.
[2]汪丁丁.知识经济的制度背景:“知识经济”批判[J].战略与管理,2000(2):66-76.
[3]KIM K,SHIN H,LEE M.The influence of partner knowledge complementarities on the effectiveness of it outsourcing[J].Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce,2010,20(3):213-233.
[4]KYUNG K K,NANRAYAN S U,JOO Y K,et al.Knowledge complementarity and knowledge exchange in supply channel relationships[J].International Journal of Information Management,2012(32):35-49.
[5]李煜华,谭金艳,胡瑶瑛.基于BP神经网络的创意产业集群知识互补度评价[J].统计与决策,2012(14):46-48.
[6]CASSIMAN B,VEUGELERS R.In search of complementarity in the innovation strategy:internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition[J].Management Science,2006,52(1):68-82.
[7]BAUM J A C,ANDREW S,TIM R.Where do small worlds come from?[J].Industrial and Corporate Change,2003,12(4):697-725.
[8]李盛竹,付小红.促进知识互补效应的我国产学研合作科研创新激励机制研究[J].科学管理研究,2014,32(3):52-55.
[9]涂振洲,顾新.基于知识流动的产学研协同创新过程研究[J].科学学研究,2013,31(9):1381-1390.
[10]韩蓉,林润辉.基于自组织临界性理论的知识创新涌现分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(4):74-79.
[11]NONAKA I,TOYAMA R,KONNO N.SECI,Ba and leadership:a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation[J].Long Range Planning,2000,33(1):5-34.
[12]NONAKA I.A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation[J].Organization Science,1994,5(1):14-37.
[13]CREPLET F.The concept of‘Ba’:a new path the study of knowledge firms[J].European Journal of Economic and Social Systems,2000,14(4):365-379.
[14]孟潇,张庆普.跨组织科研合作中知识协同过程模型研究[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(12):130-137.
[15]NONAKA I,KODAVIA M,HIROSE A.Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation:a new paradigm for organizational theory[J].European Management Journal,2014,32:137-116.
[16]SZULANSKI G.Exploring internal stickiness:impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm[J].Strategie Management Journal,1996,17(S2):27-43.
[17]AKIRA T.Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor:the case of automotive product development[J].Organization Science,2002,13(3):321-338.
[18]王兴元,姬志恒.基于知识分类的跨学科交叉创新组织机制研究[J].理论学刊,2012(11):52-56.
[19]李涛,李敏.基于知识分类的知识创新路径分析[J].科技管理研究,2010(22):182-185.
[20]赵国杰,郝文升.知识生成转化的三层嵌切球与Ba/巴交互作用模型建构[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2012,33(6):77-84.
[21]AMASON A C.Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making:resolsing a paradox for top management teams[J].Academy of Management Jonmal,1996,39(1):123-148.
[22]於崇文.地质作用的自组织临界过程动力学:地质系统在混沌边缘分形生长[J].地学前缘,2000,7(1):13-42.
[23]贾武,范文涛,丁义明.自组织临界性模型:Bak-Sneppen模型的研究进展及其展望[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006(12):1-8.