我国教育理念的人文缺失与偏差及其深层根源探析
|
摘要
当前,功利、自私、冷漠、狭隘、偏激、愤世乃至厌世以及缺乏爱心与责任、意志薄弱、拒绝高尚、甘于平庸等各种残缺型人格日益增多,折射出我国教育的人文缺失与偏差。而教育的人文缺失与偏差,其实早在教育的根本理念上就已经埋下了伏笔。近代以来落后挨打的悲惨历史命运,当前社会生活各领域普遍而激烈的竞争,自身文化中深厚的宗法血缘观念和专制主义传统,对马克思主义机械而片面的教条式理解以及科学主义的强势盛行等,是导致当前我国教育理念出现人文缺失与偏差的深层社会文化根源。
At present,various kinds of incomplete personalities,such as utilitarian,selfishness,indifference,being narrow,extreme,cynical and even world-weary,lack of love and responsibility,weak will,rejection of sublime and value,and willingness to mediocrity,are increasing. They are reflecting the lack and deviation of humanities in Chinese education,which has laid a foreshadowing in the fundamental idea of education. The tragic historical fate of backwardness and beating since modern times,the widespread and fierce competition in various fields of social life,the deep patriarchal blood concept and autocratic tradition in one's own culture,the mechanical and one-sided dogmatic understanding of Marxism and the strong prevalence of scientism are the deep social and cultural roots that lead to the lack and deviation of humanities in the current educational concept of China.
At present,various kinds of incomplete personalities,such as utilitarian,selfishness,indifference,being narrow,extreme,cynical and even world-weary,lack of love and responsibility,weak will,rejection of sublime and value,and willingness to mediocrity,are increasing. They are reflecting the lack and deviation of humanities in Chinese education,which has laid a foreshadowing in the fundamental idea of education. The tragic historical fate of backwardness and beating since modern times,the widespread and fierce competition in various fields of social life,the deep patriarchal blood concept and autocratic tradition in one's own culture,the mechanical and one-sided dogmatic understanding of Marxism and the strong prevalence of scientism are the deep social and cultural roots that lead to the lack and deviation of humanities in the current educational concept of China.
引文
[1]陈勇.科学精神与人文精神关系探析[J].自然辩证法研究,1997(1):22-27.
[2]陈独秀.陈独秀文集:第1卷[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1993.
[3]马克思恩格斯文集:第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[4]希拉里·普特南.理性、真理与历史[M].李光程,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1997.
[5]马克斯·霍克海默,西奥多·阿道尔诺.启蒙辩证法:哲学断片[M].渠敬东,曹卫东,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2006.
[6]乔治·萨顿.科学史与新人文主义[M].陈恒六,等,译.北京:华夏出版社,1989.
[7]刘宝存.科学主义与人文主义大学理念的冲突与融合[J].学术界,2005(1):50-63.
[8]马克思恩格斯文集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[2]陈独秀.陈独秀文集:第1卷[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1993.
[3]马克思恩格斯文集:第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.
[4]希拉里·普特南.理性、真理与历史[M].李光程,译.上海:上海译文出版社,1997.
[5]马克斯·霍克海默,西奥多·阿道尔诺.启蒙辩证法:哲学断片[M].渠敬东,曹卫东,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2006.
[6]乔治·萨顿.科学史与新人文主义[M].陈恒六,等,译.北京:华夏出版社,1989.
[7]刘宝存.科学主义与人文主义大学理念的冲突与融合[J].学术界,2005(1):50-63.
[8]马克思恩格斯文集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009.