论当代宽严相济刑事政策下的死刑替代制度
|
摘要
随着社会的发展和人权意识的强化,死刑罪名或废或限,死刑的执行趋于人道,国际社会更是进行着死刑废除的制度革新并掀起死刑执行延缓制度的新潮,在此影响下,我国的刑事政策导向也随之发生变化。应当说,我国目前的总体刑事政策仍然是宽严相济,我国当下还不可能立即实现死刑的废除。因此,探索如何在既符合当下刑事政策又能符合刑罚根据的前提下度过从限制死刑到最终废除死刑这样一个曲折的过渡期,构建死刑替代性制度就成为当务之急。
With the development of society and the enhancement of human rights awareness,the crimes of death penalty are abolished or limited,and the execution of death penalty tends to be humane. The international community is carrying out the reform of death penalty abolition and the new trend of death penalty postponement. Under the influence of this,our criminal policy orientation also changes accordingly. It is impossible to achieve the abolition of death penalty immediately in China. Therefore,explore how to live through the tortuous transition from the restriction of death penalty to the final abolition of death penalty under the premise that it is in line with the current criminal policy and the basis of punishment. So it is urgent to build an alternative system of death penalty.
With the development of society and the enhancement of human rights awareness,the crimes of death penalty are abolished or limited,and the execution of death penalty tends to be humane. The international community is carrying out the reform of death penalty abolition and the new trend of death penalty postponement. Under the influence of this,our criminal policy orientation also changes accordingly. It is impossible to achieve the abolition of death penalty immediately in China. Therefore,explore how to live through the tortuous transition from the restriction of death penalty to the final abolition of death penalty under the premise that it is in line with the current criminal policy and the basis of punishment. So it is urgent to build an alternative system of death penalty.
引文
[1]切萨雷·贝卡里亚.论犯罪与刑罚(增编本)[M].黄风,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2014:36,177.
[2]李光灿.中华人民共和国刑法论(上)[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1984:335.
[3]陈兴良.刑法哲学(修订三版)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:314-321,333—351,354.
[4]马克昌.刑法通论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2002:58-59.
[5]刘春花.向死而生——中国死刑制度改革的政治抉择[M].北京:法律出版社,2015:26.
[6]何秉松.刑法教科书[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2000:535-540.
[7]高铭暄.中国刑法学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1989:229.
[8]李元,李文勃.和谐社会视角下老年罪犯人权保护的研究与思考[A]//第七届国家高级检察官论坛会议论文[C],2011:1 311.
[9]邱兴隆.关于惩罚的哲学——刑罚根据论[M].北京:法律出版社,2000:39-54.
[10]赵秉志.死刑司法控制论及其替代措施[M].北京:法律出版社,2008:500.
[11]胡兴东.中国古代死刑制度史[M].北京:法律出版社,2008:70-80.
[12]王鹏祥.当代中国死刑适用标准研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2015:40.
(1)中共中央党校党史教研室选编,中国共产党第一次对于时局的主张(1992年6月15日).中共党史参考资料,北京:人民出版社,1979:341.
(2)赵秉志.宽严相济刑事政策及其贯彻的基本问题[J].人民检察,2009(9).
[2]李光灿.中华人民共和国刑法论(上)[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1984:335.
[3]陈兴良.刑法哲学(修订三版)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004:314-321,333—351,354.
[4]马克昌.刑法通论[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2002:58-59.
[5]刘春花.向死而生——中国死刑制度改革的政治抉择[M].北京:法律出版社,2015:26.
[6]何秉松.刑法教科书[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2000:535-540.
[7]高铭暄.中国刑法学[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1989:229.
[8]李元,李文勃.和谐社会视角下老年罪犯人权保护的研究与思考[A]//第七届国家高级检察官论坛会议论文[C],2011:1 311.
[9]邱兴隆.关于惩罚的哲学——刑罚根据论[M].北京:法律出版社,2000:39-54.
[10]赵秉志.死刑司法控制论及其替代措施[M].北京:法律出版社,2008:500.
[11]胡兴东.中国古代死刑制度史[M].北京:法律出版社,2008:70-80.
[12]王鹏祥.当代中国死刑适用标准研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2015:40.
(1)中共中央党校党史教研室选编,中国共产党第一次对于时局的主张(1992年6月15日).中共党史参考资料,北京:人民出版社,1979:341.
(2)赵秉志.宽严相济刑事政策及其贯彻的基本问题[J].人民检察,2009(9).