福建省化石能源地生态承载力研究
|
摘要
[目的]研究福建省化石能源地生态承载力。[方法]针对当前研究中忽略化石能源地生态承载力的不足,运用生态足迹法与净初级生产力相结合的计算模型,对福建省进行实证研究。[结果]福建省各市2016年的化石能源地生态承载力存在显著的区域差异,人均化石能源地生态承载力以厦门最低,南平最高;各市人均化石能源地生态承载力的总构成中,林地和水域近海是构成主体,大部分城市这两项之和占到了80%以上。[结论]该化石能源地生态承载力模型能够更合理评价能源消费的可持续性,在一定程度上完善生态足迹法。
[Objective]The research aimed to study the ecological carrying capacity of fossil energy land of Fujian Province.[Method]To overcome the defect of current studies of ignoring ecological carrying capacity of fossil energy land,this paper used the model which was established by combining ecological footprint analysis and net primary productivity,taking Fujian Province as a case study.[Result]In 2016,ecological carrying capacity of fossil energy land of Fujian Province showed significant regional difference,ecological carrying capacity per capita of fossil energy land of Xiamen City and Nanping City were lowest and highest respectively.In most cities of Fujian Province,forests and waters inshore account for more than 80% of the ecological carrying capacity per capita of fossil energy land.[Conclusion]The model can evaluate the sustainability of energy consumption more roundly and improve ecological footprint theory to a certain extent.
[Objective]The research aimed to study the ecological carrying capacity of fossil energy land of Fujian Province.[Method]To overcome the defect of current studies of ignoring ecological carrying capacity of fossil energy land,this paper used the model which was established by combining ecological footprint analysis and net primary productivity,taking Fujian Province as a case study.[Result]In 2016,ecological carrying capacity of fossil energy land of Fujian Province showed significant regional difference,ecological carrying capacity per capita of fossil energy land of Xiamen City and Nanping City were lowest and highest respectively.In most cities of Fujian Province,forests and waters inshore account for more than 80% of the ecological carrying capacity per capita of fossil energy land.[Conclusion]The model can evaluate the sustainability of energy consumption more roundly and improve ecological footprint theory to a certain extent.
引文
[1]谢高地,周海林,鲁春霞,等.我国自然资源的承载力分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2005,15(5):93-98.
[2]WACKERNAGEL M,REES W E.Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital:Economics from an ecological footprint perspective[J].Ecological economics,1997,20(1):3-24.
[3]方恺,董德明,沈万斌.生态足迹理论在能源消费评价中的缺陷与改进探讨[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(6):1013-1021.
[4]VENETOULIS J,TALBERTH J.Refining the ecological footprint[J].Environment development and sustainability,2008,10(4):441-469.
[5]符国基,徐恒力,陈文婷.海南省自然生态承载力研究[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(3):412-421.
[6]方恺,沈万斌.CO2排放承载力计算模型的构建与应用[J].生态科学,2010,29(6):558-562.
[7]方恺,沈万斌,郑沁敏,等.化石能源地生态承载力研究[J].环境科学与技术,2011,34(12):201-205.
[8]朱利欣.基于MODIS数据的京津冀地区NPP及生态足迹和生态承载力时空分布研究[D].石家庄:河北师范大学,2018.
[9]魏黎灵,李岚彬,林月,等.基于生态足迹法的闽三角城市群生态安全评价[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4317-4326.
[10]福建省统计局.福建统计年鉴2017[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2017.
[11]福建省国土资源厅.福建省第二次全国土地调查主要数据成果公报[EB/OL].(2014-07-04)[2018-07-20].http://www.mlr.gov.cn/tdzt/tdgl/decdc/dccg/gscg/201407/t20140704_1322754.htm.
[12]FIALA N.Measuring sustainability:Why the ecological footprint is bad economics and bad environmental science[J].Ecological economics,2008,67(4):519-525.
[2]WACKERNAGEL M,REES W E.Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital:Economics from an ecological footprint perspective[J].Ecological economics,1997,20(1):3-24.
[3]方恺,董德明,沈万斌.生态足迹理论在能源消费评价中的缺陷与改进探讨[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(6):1013-1021.
[4]VENETOULIS J,TALBERTH J.Refining the ecological footprint[J].Environment development and sustainability,2008,10(4):441-469.
[5]符国基,徐恒力,陈文婷.海南省自然生态承载力研究[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(3):412-421.
[6]方恺,沈万斌.CO2排放承载力计算模型的构建与应用[J].生态科学,2010,29(6):558-562.
[7]方恺,沈万斌,郑沁敏,等.化石能源地生态承载力研究[J].环境科学与技术,2011,34(12):201-205.
[8]朱利欣.基于MODIS数据的京津冀地区NPP及生态足迹和生态承载力时空分布研究[D].石家庄:河北师范大学,2018.
[9]魏黎灵,李岚彬,林月,等.基于生态足迹法的闽三角城市群生态安全评价[J].生态学报,2018,38(12):4317-4326.
[10]福建省统计局.福建统计年鉴2017[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2017.
[11]福建省国土资源厅.福建省第二次全国土地调查主要数据成果公报[EB/OL].(2014-07-04)[2018-07-20].http://www.mlr.gov.cn/tdzt/tdgl/decdc/dccg/gscg/201407/t20140704_1322754.htm.
[12]FIALA N.Measuring sustainability:Why the ecological footprint is bad economics and bad environmental science[J].Ecological economics,2008,67(4):519-525.