中文版早产儿非营养性吸吮功能评估量表的信效度分析
|
摘要
目的翻译中文版早产儿非营养性吸吮功能评估量表并进行信效度检验。方法按照翻译程序将英文版早产儿非营养性吸吮功能评估量表编译成中文,对180例早产儿进行测试,评价量表的信度和效度。结果量表全体一致内容效度指数为0.893,平均内容效度指数为0.937。探索性因子分析提取2个公因子包括协调因素、非协调因素,累积方差贡献率为68.475%,所有条目在其公因子上的因子载荷均>0.4;2个因子与总量表的相关系数分别为0.979、0.449,均有统计学意义(P<0.01);集合效度0.460～0.932,区分效度0.004～0.389。总量表的Cronbachα系数为0.896,折半信度为0.873,重测信度为0.798。结论中文版早产儿非营养性吸吮功能评估量表具有较好的信度和效度,对评价我国早产儿口腔运动功能具有一定的应用价值。
Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of non-nutritive sucking scoring system(NNS) in preterm newborns(PTNB). Methods NNS in PTNB was translated from English to Chinese. The reliability and validity were tested among 180 premature infants in NICU. Results Content validity index of the scale was 0.893, and the average content validity index 0.937. Two common factors were extracted from the scale, which explained 68.475% of the total variance. The loading factor of all items was exceeded 0.4. The correlation coefficient between the 2 factors and the total was 0.979 and 0.449 respectively, showing statistical significance(P<0.01). Convergent validity was 0.460～0.932, and discriminant validity 0.004～0.389. Cronbach α coefficient of the scale was 0.896; the split-half reliability 0.873, and retest reliability 0.798. Conclusion The Chinese version of NNS in PTNB has been proved to be reliable and valid. It is a valuable tool for evaluating oral motor function of premature infants in China.
Objective To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of non-nutritive sucking scoring system(NNS) in preterm newborns(PTNB). Methods NNS in PTNB was translated from English to Chinese. The reliability and validity were tested among 180 premature infants in NICU. Results Content validity index of the scale was 0.893, and the average content validity index 0.937. Two common factors were extracted from the scale, which explained 68.475% of the total variance. The loading factor of all items was exceeded 0.4. The correlation coefficient between the 2 factors and the total was 0.979 and 0.449 respectively, showing statistical significance(P<0.01). Convergent validity was 0.460～0.932, and discriminant validity 0.004～0.389. Cronbach α coefficient of the scale was 0.896; the split-half reliability 0.873, and retest reliability 0.798. Conclusion The Chinese version of NNS in PTNB has been proved to be reliable and valid. It is a valuable tool for evaluating oral motor function of premature infants in China.
引文
[1]Howson C P,Kinney M V,McDougall L,et al.Born Too Soon:Preterm Birth Matters[J].Reprod Health,2013,10(1):S1.DOI:10.1186/1742-4755-10-S1-S1.
[2]Reynolds E W,Grider D,Bell C S.Swallow-breath Interaction and Phase of Respiration with Swallow During Non-nutritive Suck in Infants Affected by Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome[J].Front Pediatr,2017,4(5):214.DOI:10.3389/fped.2017.00214.
[3]丁晓华,王松,李胜玲.非营养性吸吮在早产儿护理中的研究进展[J].护士进修杂志,2010,25(7):636-638.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2010.07.032.
[4]Da Costa S P,Van Der Schans C P.The Reliability of the Neonatal Oral-motor Assessment Scale[J].Acta Paediatr,2008,97(1):21-26.DOI:10.1111/j.16 51 22 27.2007.00577.x.
[5]Neiva F C,Leone C,Leone C R.Non-nutritive Sucking Scoring System for Preterm Newborns[J].Acta Paediatr,2008,97(10):1370-1375.DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00943.x.
[6]李峥,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:83.
[7]叶增杰,阮小丽,曾珍,等.中文版10条目心理韧性量表在护生群体中的信效度分析[J].护理学报,2016,23(21):9-12.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2016.21.009.
[8]杜强,贾丽艳.SPSS统计分析从入门到精通[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2011:331-332.
[9]邓芳丽,张健,李宣霖,等.中文版护士职业认同量表的信效度分析[J].护理学报,2016,23(17):47-50.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2016.17.047.
[10]陈维,黄程琰,毛天欣,等.多维测评工具聚敛和区分效度的SEM分析[J].西南师范大学学报,2016,41(2):136-138.DOI:10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2016.02.024.
[11]邢海燕,温多红,陈三妹,等.中文版Zelaya艾滋病歧视量表的信度和效度[J].中华护理杂志,2012,47(12):1096-1098.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2012.12.016.本文编辑谢文鸿
[2]Reynolds E W,Grider D,Bell C S.Swallow-breath Interaction and Phase of Respiration with Swallow During Non-nutritive Suck in Infants Affected by Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome[J].Front Pediatr,2017,4(5):214.DOI:10.3389/fped.2017.00214.
[3]丁晓华,王松,李胜玲.非营养性吸吮在早产儿护理中的研究进展[J].护士进修杂志,2010,25(7):636-638.DOI:10.16821/j.cnki.hsjx.2010.07.032.
[4]Da Costa S P,Van Der Schans C P.The Reliability of the Neonatal Oral-motor Assessment Scale[J].Acta Paediatr,2008,97(1):21-26.DOI:10.1111/j.16 51 22 27.2007.00577.x.
[5]Neiva F C,Leone C,Leone C R.Non-nutritive Sucking Scoring System for Preterm Newborns[J].Acta Paediatr,2008,97(10):1370-1375.DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2008.00943.x.
[6]李峥,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:83.
[7]叶增杰,阮小丽,曾珍,等.中文版10条目心理韧性量表在护生群体中的信效度分析[J].护理学报,2016,23(21):9-12.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2016.21.009.
[8]杜强,贾丽艳.SPSS统计分析从入门到精通[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2011:331-332.
[9]邓芳丽,张健,李宣霖,等.中文版护士职业认同量表的信效度分析[J].护理学报,2016,23(17):47-50.DOI:10.16460/j.issn1008-9969.2016.17.047.
[10]陈维,黄程琰,毛天欣,等.多维测评工具聚敛和区分效度的SEM分析[J].西南师范大学学报,2016,41(2):136-138.DOI:10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2016.02.024.
[11]邢海燕,温多红,陈三妹,等.中文版Zelaya艾滋病歧视量表的信度和效度[J].中华护理杂志,2012,47(12):1096-1098.DOI:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2012.12.016.本文编辑谢文鸿