实践的哲学:美国学界对中国哲学的一种认知
|
摘要
中国哲学在美国哲学界处于非主流乃至边缘的地位,这与美国学界对哲学的认识传统有密切的关系。但是,近些年来,一些美国学者也在反思和重新看待哲学和其他非主流哲学,他们对哲学概念的重新思考,确认了理论哲学和实践哲学同样是哲学的重要组成部分,而且,他们强调实践哲学在当代哲学的重要性,并以此来分析和研究中国哲学,从而使中国哲学本所具有的实践性得以彰显,实践的哲学是当代美国学界对中国哲学的一种新的认知。
Chinese philosophy is in a non-mainstream or even marginal position in the American philosophy,which viewpoint is closely related to the understanding tradition of philosophy in the American. Some American scholars are also reconsidering philosophy and other non-mainstream philosophy in recent years. They confirm the theory philosophy and practice philosophy as equal important parts of philosophy when they rethink of philosophical concept,and they emphasize the value of practice philosophy in contemporary philosophy as well,by which their analysis and research of Chinese philosophy,and so the practicability of Chinese philosophy can be manifested. The practice philosophy is a new cognition of Chinese philosophy in contemporary American.
Chinese philosophy is in a non-mainstream or even marginal position in the American philosophy,which viewpoint is closely related to the understanding tradition of philosophy in the American. Some American scholars are also reconsidering philosophy and other non-mainstream philosophy in recent years. They confirm the theory philosophy and practice philosophy as equal important parts of philosophy when they rethink of philosophical concept,and they emphasize the value of practice philosophy in contemporary philosophy as well,by which their analysis and research of Chinese philosophy,and so the practicability of Chinese philosophy can be manifested. The practice philosophy is a new cognition of Chinese philosophy in contemporary American.
引文
(1)Bryan Van Norden,Taking back Philosophy:A Multicultural Manifesto,Columbia University Press,2017,p.9.
(2)Amy Olberding,Chinese Philosophy and Wider Philosophical Discourse:Including Chinese Philosophy in General Audience Philosophy Journals,APA Newsletter,2016,p.6.
(3)Erin Cline,What’s Missing in Philosophy Departments?Specialists in Chinese Philosophy,APA Newsletter,2016,p.11.
(4)Bryan Van Norden,Three Questions about the Crisis in Chinese Philosophy,APA Newsletter,2008,p.4.
(5)Alexus Mc Leod,East Asian Martial Arts as Philosophical Practice,APA Newsletter,2018,p.12.
(6)Xinyan Jiang,the Study of Chinese Philosophy in the English Speaking,Philosophy Compass,6,3(2011),p.175
(7)黄勇:《西方世界中国哲学研究之三重约束》,《文史哲》2017年第2期;Yong Huang,The“Double Bind”on Specialists in Chinese Philosophy,APA Newsletter,2015,p.18.
(8)丁立群:《理论哲学与实践哲学:孰为第一哲学?》,《哲学研究》2012年第1期。
(9)Chad Hansen,Chinese Language,Chinese Philosophy,and Truth,Journal of Asian Studies,44,3(1985),p.492.
(10)Bin Song,Three Sacrificial Rituals and the Practicability of Ruist Philosophy,APA Newsletter,2018,p.2.
(11)Alexus Mc Leod,Theories of Truth in Chinese Philosophy:A comparative approach,Rowman&Littlefield International Ltd,2016,p.ix.
(12)Roger T.Ames,Confucian Role Ethics:A Vocabulary,The Chinese University Press,2011,p.161
(13)郭齐勇、李兰兰:《安乐哲“儒家角色伦理”学说析评》,《哲学研究》2015年第1期。
(14)Bryan Van Norden,Taking back Philosophy:A Multicultural Manifesto,Columbia University Press,2017,p.18.
(15)(16)David Wong,Some Reflections on the Status of Chinese Philosophy in U.S.Graduate Programs,APA Newsletter,2016,p.9,p.9.
(17)《哲学动态》2018年第7期刊登倪培民的文章《从功夫论到功夫哲学》,该文作者提到的功夫哲学在一定程度上是实践哲学的范畴。倪培民曾在美国高校任教,长期关注中国哲学的功夫论,且于2010年在美国《纽约时报》发表过《对哲学家而言的功夫》,阐述了功夫论是中国哲学最重要的特点,这也代表了美国学界在中国哲学研究中的实践哲学取向。
(2)Amy Olberding,Chinese Philosophy and Wider Philosophical Discourse:Including Chinese Philosophy in General Audience Philosophy Journals,APA Newsletter,2016,p.6.
(3)Erin Cline,What’s Missing in Philosophy Departments?Specialists in Chinese Philosophy,APA Newsletter,2016,p.11.
(4)Bryan Van Norden,Three Questions about the Crisis in Chinese Philosophy,APA Newsletter,2008,p.4.
(5)Alexus Mc Leod,East Asian Martial Arts as Philosophical Practice,APA Newsletter,2018,p.12.
(6)Xinyan Jiang,the Study of Chinese Philosophy in the English Speaking,Philosophy Compass,6,3(2011),p.175
(7)黄勇:《西方世界中国哲学研究之三重约束》,《文史哲》2017年第2期;Yong Huang,The“Double Bind”on Specialists in Chinese Philosophy,APA Newsletter,2015,p.18.
(8)丁立群:《理论哲学与实践哲学:孰为第一哲学?》,《哲学研究》2012年第1期。
(9)Chad Hansen,Chinese Language,Chinese Philosophy,and Truth,Journal of Asian Studies,44,3(1985),p.492.
(10)Bin Song,Three Sacrificial Rituals and the Practicability of Ruist Philosophy,APA Newsletter,2018,p.2.
(11)Alexus Mc Leod,Theories of Truth in Chinese Philosophy:A comparative approach,Rowman&Littlefield International Ltd,2016,p.ix.
(12)Roger T.Ames,Confucian Role Ethics:A Vocabulary,The Chinese University Press,2011,p.161
(13)郭齐勇、李兰兰:《安乐哲“儒家角色伦理”学说析评》,《哲学研究》2015年第1期。
(14)Bryan Van Norden,Taking back Philosophy:A Multicultural Manifesto,Columbia University Press,2017,p.18.
(15)(16)David Wong,Some Reflections on the Status of Chinese Philosophy in U.S.Graduate Programs,APA Newsletter,2016,p.9,p.9.
(17)《哲学动态》2018年第7期刊登倪培民的文章《从功夫论到功夫哲学》,该文作者提到的功夫哲学在一定程度上是实践哲学的范畴。倪培民曾在美国高校任教,长期关注中国哲学的功夫论,且于2010年在美国《纽约时报》发表过《对哲学家而言的功夫》,阐述了功夫论是中国哲学最重要的特点,这也代表了美国学界在中国哲学研究中的实践哲学取向。