两化融合背景下我国企业工业管理基础能力评价研究
|
摘要
持续推进信息化和工业化融合是党中央、国务院的重要战略部署,也是推动制造强国、网络强国建设的扣合点。两化融合背景下打造提升工业管理基础能力,是企业加快推进两化深度融合、实现转型升级和创新发展的重要前提。充分发挥评价的引导作用,从产品与服务、基础设施与资源、生产与运作、经营与管理和战略与组织5个关键维度22个重要方面构建企业工业管理基础能力评价框架,并给出具体的评价指标体系和评价方法。基于6万余家工业企业评估数据,系统分析我国企业工业管理基础能力和两化融合发展现状,并针对企业未来两化融合发展的主要路径与方法提出对策建议。
Continuous promotion of informatization and industrialization integration(Ⅲ) is an important strategic deployment of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council, and also the buckle point to construct manufacturing power and network power. It is an important prerequisite for the enterprises to accelerate the deep integration of Ⅲ and realize the transformation, upgrading and innovation development in order to build up the basic ability of industrial management(BAIM) under the background of Ⅲ. To make the evaluation work as a guidance role fully, this paper constructs the evaluation framework from 5 key dimensions and 22 important aspects in specific,including products and services, infrastructure and resources, production, operation and management, strategy and organization, and then, the evaluation index system and the evaluation method are also provided. Based on the assessment data of more than 60 thousand industrial enterprises, this paper systematically analyzes the BAIM and the current situation of the development of Ⅲ in China. At the same time, countermeasures and suggestions are put forward in view of the main ways and methods of the integration development of Ⅲ in the future.
Continuous promotion of informatization and industrialization integration(Ⅲ) is an important strategic deployment of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council, and also the buckle point to construct manufacturing power and network power. It is an important prerequisite for the enterprises to accelerate the deep integration of Ⅲ and realize the transformation, upgrading and innovation development in order to build up the basic ability of industrial management(BAIM) under the background of Ⅲ. To make the evaluation work as a guidance role fully, this paper constructs the evaluation framework from 5 key dimensions and 22 important aspects in specific,including products and services, infrastructure and resources, production, operation and management, strategy and organization, and then, the evaluation index system and the evaluation method are also provided. Based on the assessment data of more than 60 thousand industrial enterprises, this paper systematically analyzes the BAIM and the current situation of the development of Ⅲ in China. At the same time, countermeasures and suggestions are put forward in view of the main ways and methods of the integration development of Ⅲ in the future.
引文
[1]吴澄.“两化融合”和“深度融合”:我国工业信息化的现状、问题及未来展望[J].自动化与信息工程,2011,32(3):1-8.
[2]周剑,徐大丰.两化融合的概念内涵和方法路径研究[J].产业经济评论,2015(5):12-19.
[3]两化融合服务联盟.中国两化融合发展数据地图:2017[EB/OL].(2018-05-22)[2019-01-25].http://cspiii.com/pgzd/gzzd/jd/2018-05-22-5039.html.
[4]周剑.两化融合管理体系构建[J].计算机集成制造系统,2015,21(7):1915-1929.
[5]李君,邱君降,窦克勤,等.新工业革命背景下制造业管理模式研究与创新[J].制造业自动化,2017(1):130-133.
[6]李君.互联网时代的工业企业可持续竞争能力实证研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2018,26(5):168-179.
[7]李君,付宇涵,成雨.基于多源数据的两化融合绩效研究分析[J].计算机集成制造系统, 2018,24(12):2911-2931.
[8]李君,邱君降,成雨.数字经济时代的企业创新变革趋势[J].中国信息化,2018(4):12-14.
[9]李君,邱君降,柳杨,等.工业互联网平台评价指标体系构建与应用研究[J].中国科技论坛, 2018(12):70-86.
[10]王晰巍,安超,初毅.信息化与工业化融合的评价指标及评价方法研究[J].图书情报工作, 2011,55(6):96-99.
[11]周剑,陈杰.制造业企业两化融合评估指标体系构建[J].计算机集成制造系统,2013, 19(9):2251-2263.
[12]陈杰,周剑,付宇涵.我国工业企业两化融合评价体系及实证研究[J].制造业自动化,2016, 38(6):143-146,156.
[13]张新,马建华,刘培德,等.区域两化融合水平的评价方法及应用[J].山东大学学报(理学版),2012,47(3):71-76.
[14]朱春珑.工业企业“两化融合”发展效果评价研究[D].北京:北京理工大学,2015.
[15]鲁伟伟.互联网时代企业信息化评价指标体系研究[D].北京:北京工业大学,2017.
[16]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.工业企业信息化和工业化融合评估规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
[17]吴磊.工业基础能力提升研究:基于我国工业面板数据的实证[J].经济研究导刊,2016(4):1-2,26.
[18]王厚芹,赵芸芸,黄玉洁,等.世界发达国家提升工业基础能力的经验与启示[N/OL].(2014-10-29)[2019-01-25].http://opinion.hexun.com/2014-10-29/169821886.html.
[19]姜明文,付丽芳.国外国防工业基础能力评估与管理的基本做法及特点[J].中国航天,2014(4):38-40.
[20]王晓彬.国防科技工业基础能力分析与评价[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2007.
[2]周剑,徐大丰.两化融合的概念内涵和方法路径研究[J].产业经济评论,2015(5):12-19.
[3]两化融合服务联盟.中国两化融合发展数据地图:2017[EB/OL].(2018-05-22)[2019-01-25].http://cspiii.com/pgzd/gzzd/jd/2018-05-22-5039.html.
[4]周剑.两化融合管理体系构建[J].计算机集成制造系统,2015,21(7):1915-1929.
[5]李君,邱君降,窦克勤,等.新工业革命背景下制造业管理模式研究与创新[J].制造业自动化,2017(1):130-133.
[6]李君.互联网时代的工业企业可持续竞争能力实证研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2018,26(5):168-179.
[7]李君,付宇涵,成雨.基于多源数据的两化融合绩效研究分析[J].计算机集成制造系统, 2018,24(12):2911-2931.
[8]李君,邱君降,成雨.数字经济时代的企业创新变革趋势[J].中国信息化,2018(4):12-14.
[9]李君,邱君降,柳杨,等.工业互联网平台评价指标体系构建与应用研究[J].中国科技论坛, 2018(12):70-86.
[10]王晰巍,安超,初毅.信息化与工业化融合的评价指标及评价方法研究[J].图书情报工作, 2011,55(6):96-99.
[11]周剑,陈杰.制造业企业两化融合评估指标体系构建[J].计算机集成制造系统,2013, 19(9):2251-2263.
[12]陈杰,周剑,付宇涵.我国工业企业两化融合评价体系及实证研究[J].制造业自动化,2016, 38(6):143-146,156.
[13]张新,马建华,刘培德,等.区域两化融合水平的评价方法及应用[J].山东大学学报(理学版),2012,47(3):71-76.
[14]朱春珑.工业企业“两化融合”发展效果评价研究[D].北京:北京理工大学,2015.
[15]鲁伟伟.互联网时代企业信息化评价指标体系研究[D].北京:北京工业大学,2017.
[16]中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.工业企业信息化和工业化融合评估规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
[17]吴磊.工业基础能力提升研究:基于我国工业面板数据的实证[J].经济研究导刊,2016(4):1-2,26.
[18]王厚芹,赵芸芸,黄玉洁,等.世界发达国家提升工业基础能力的经验与启示[N/OL].(2014-10-29)[2019-01-25].http://opinion.hexun.com/2014-10-29/169821886.html.
[19]姜明文,付丽芳.国外国防工业基础能力评估与管理的基本做法及特点[J].中国航天,2014(4):38-40.
[20]王晓彬.国防科技工业基础能力分析与评价[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2007.