面孔社会性线索的加工机制
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Processing mechanism of social cues in faces
  • 作者:朱千 ; 寇慧 ; 毕泰勇
  • 英文作者:ZHU Qian;KOU Hui;BI Tai-Yong;School of Management, Zunyi Medical University;
  • 关键词:面孔社会性线索 ; 面孔情绪 ; 面孔吸引力 ; 注视方向 ; 唇读
  • 英文关键词:social cues in faces;;neural mechanisms;;emotional face;;facial attractiveness;;gaze direction;;lipreading
  • 中文刊名:SLXU
  • 英文刊名:Acta Physiologica Sinica
  • 机构:遵义医科大学管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-12-27 08:38
  • 出版单位:生理学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.71
  • 基金:supported by the Scientific Research Startup Foundation (No. F-875);; the New Scientist Training Program (No. [2017]5733-014) of Zunyi Medical University, China
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SLXU201901008
  • 页数:13
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:31-1352/Q
  • 分类号:77-89
摘要
本文旨在综述面孔社会性线索加工的神经机制。通过系统回顾面孔社会性线索相关的研究,分别从面孔情绪、面孔吸引力、眼睛注视方向和面孔朝向以及唇读四个角度阐述其加工的神经机制。首先简要阐述了人类大脑对面孔刺激的一般加工机制,包括下颞叶梭状回面孔区、颞上沟后部面孔区和枕下回的枕叶面孔区等脑区在加工面孔刺激中的功能。接下来探讨了大脑对情绪面孔的加工。情绪面孔加工主要包括对面孔的知觉编码和情绪编码。研究显示,除了视觉皮层的面孔加工区之外,杏仁核在情绪编码中具有重要作用。神经系统对面孔表情的反应受到情绪类型、情绪面孔的动态性以及情绪面孔阈下呈现等因素的影响。在面孔吸引力加工方面,研究表明高吸引力面孔会激活奖赏相关的神经环路,但是吸引力对神经活动的具体影响目前仍存在争议。对面孔吸引力的神经反应可能受实验任务类型、观察者性取向和性别、观察者心理因素、面孔其他社会线索等因素的调节。眼睛注视方向和面孔朝向线索则和视觉注意有关,其神经加工系统除了包括面孔加工区外,还包括和注意相关的顶内沟等区域。关于唇读的研究则表明唇读在言语知觉中具有重要作用,可以激活听觉皮层和言语相关皮层。最后,一方面总结了以上各方面实验证据对面孔信息加工理论的支持和改善作用,另一方面进一步探讨了特殊人群中这些加工存在的缺陷,并指出了该领域未来的研究方向。
        The purpose of the present paper was to review the processing mechanisms of social cues in faces. We summarized researches relative to social cues in faces and discussed the processing mechanism of these cues from the aspects of facial expression, facial attractiveness, gaze and face direction, and lipreading. First, we discussed the general neural mechanism of face information processing and summarized the functions of face areas in the fusiform gyrus, posterior superior temporal sulcus and inferior occipital gyrus. Next,the neural mechanism of emotional face perception was discussed. The processing of emotional faces consists of encodings of perceptual and emotional components. The amygdala plays an important role in the emotional processing of facial expressions. Furthermore,the neural responses to facial expressions may be influenced by multiple factors, such as the type of emotion, the dynamic presentation of the face and the consciousness of facial expressions. With respect to facial attractiveness processing, studies has shown that the reward circuitry is activated by highly attractive faces. However, the influence of facial attractiveness on neural responses remains elusive. It is proposed that the neural responses to facial attractiveness might be modulated by factors such as the task, observer's sex,expectation and other social cues in faces. Eye gaze perception and face view perception are related to visual attention, and the relevant neural circuitry has been found to include attention-related areas, such as the intraparietal sulcus. Finally, research on lipreading reveals its important role in language perception. The auditory cortex and language-related cortex have been shown to be activated by lipreading. In summary, the present evidence may support facial information processing theory. However, the theory could be further improved based on present and future findings. Furthermore, we discussed the deficits in the processing of social cues in individuals with mental disorders and proposed future research directions in this field.
引文
1 Cassia VM,Turati C,Simion F.Can a nonspecific bias toward top-heavy patterns explain newborns’face preference?Psychol Sci 2004;15(6):379-383.
    2 Desimone R.Face-selective cells in the temporal cortex of monkeys.J Cogn Neurosci 1991;3(1):1-8.
    3 Pinsk MA,DeSimone K,Moore T,Gross CG,Kastner S.Representations of faces and body parts in macaque temporal cortex:a functional MRI study.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2005;102(19):6996-7001.
    4 Kanwisher N,McDermott J,Chun MM.The fusiform face area:a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception.J Neurosci 1997;17(11):4302-4311.
    5 McCarthy G,Puce A,Gore JC,Allison T.Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus.J Cogn Neurosci1997;9(5):605-610.
    6 Kanwisher N,Yovel G.The fusiform face area:a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2006;361(1476):2109-2128.
    7 Yovel G,Kanwisher N.The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect.Curr Biol 2005;15(24):2256-2262.
    8 Damasio AR,Damasio H,Vanhoesen GW.Prosopagnosiaanatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms.Neurology1982;32(4):331-341.
    9 Sergent J,Signoret JL.Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia.Cereb Cortex 1992;2(5):375-388.
    10 Mundel T,Milton TG,Dimitrov W,Wilson HW,Pelizzari C,Uftring S,Torres O,Erickson RK,Spire TP,Towle VL.Transient inability to distinguish between faces:electrophysiologic studies.J Clin Neurophysiol 2003;20(2):102-110.
    11 Parvizi J,Jacques C,Foster BL,Withoft N,Rangarajan V,Weiner KS,Grill-Spector K.Electrical stimulation of human fusiform face-selective regions distorts face perception.J Neurosci 2012;32(43):14915-14920.
    12 Tong F,Nakayama K,Vaughan JT,Kanwisher N.Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex.Neuron 1998;21(4):753-759.
    13 Fox CJ,Iaria G,Barton JJ.Defining the face processing network:Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI.Hum Brain Mapp 2009;30(5):1637-1651.
    14 Haxby JV,Hoffman EA,Gobbini MI.The distributed human neural system for face perception.Trends Cogn Sci2000;4(6):223-233.
    15 Andrews TJ,Ewbank MP.Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe.Neuroimage 2004;23(3):905-913.
    16 Hasselmo ME,Rolls ET,Baylis GC.The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual-cortex of the monkey.Behav Brain Res1989;32(3):203-218.
    17 Perrett DI,Hietanen JK,Oram MW,Benson PJ.Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex.Philos Trans R Soc London Biol Sci 1992;335(1273):23-30.
    18 Calder AJ,Beaver JD,Winston JS,Dolan RJ,Jenkins R,Eger E,Henson RN.Separate coding of different gaze directions in the superior temporal sulcus and inferior parietal lobule.Curr Biol 2007;17(1):20-25.
    19 Perrett DI,Smith PAJ,Potter DD,Mistlin AJ,Head AS,Milner AD,Jeeves MA.Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction.Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1985;223(1232):293-317.
    20 Pitcher D,Walsh V,Yovel G,Duchaine B.TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing.Curr Biol 2007;17(18):1568-1573.
    21 Harris RJ,Young AW,Andrews TJ.Morphing between expressions dissociates continuous from categorical representations of facial expression in the human brain.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109(51):21164-21169.
    22 Said CP,Moore CD,Engell AD,Todorov A,Haxby JV.Distributed representations of dynamic facial expressions in the superior temporal sulcus.J Vis 2010;10(5):11.
    23 Pitcher D.Facial expression recognition takes longer in the posterior superior temporal sulcus than in the occipital face area.J Neurosci 2014;34(27):9173-9177.
    24 Harry B,Williams MA,Davis C,Kim J.Emotional expressions evoke a differential response in the fusiform face area.Front Hum Neurosci 2013;7:692.
    25 Wegrzyn M,Riehle M,Labudda K,Woermann F,Baumgartner F,Pollmann S,Bien CG,Kissler J.Investigating the brain basis of facial expression perception using multi-voxel pattern analysis.Cortex 2015;69:131-140.
    26 Calvo MG,Nummenmaa L.Perceptual and affective mechanisms in facial expression recognition:An integrative review.Cogn Emot 2016;30(6):1081-1106.
    27 Whalen PJ,Raila H,Bennett R,Mattek A,Brown A,Taylor J,Tieghem MV,Tanner A,Miner M,Palmer A.Neuroscience and facial expressions of emotion:The role of amygdala-prefrontal interactions.Emot Rev 2013;5(1):78-83.
    28 Brooks SJ,Savov V,Allzen E,Benedict C,Fredriksson R,Schioth HB.Exposure to subliminal arousing stimuli induces robust activation in the amygdala,hippocampus,anterior cingulate,insular cortex and primary visual cortex:a systematic meta-analysis of fMRI studies.Neuroimage 2012;59(3):2962-2973.
    29 Harris RJ,Young AW,Andrews TJ.Dynamic stimuli demonstrate a categorical representation of facial expression in the amygdala.Neuropsychologia 2014;56:47-52.
    30 Rellecke J,Sommer W,Schacht A.Does processing of emotional facial expressions depend on intention?Timeresolved evidence from event-related brain potentials.Biol Psychol 2012;90(1):23-32.
    31 Marchi F,Newen A.Cognitive penetrability and emotion recognition in human facial expressions.Front Psychol2015;6:828.
    32 Hamann S.Mapping discrete and dimensional emotions onto the brain:controversies and consensus.Trends Cogn Sci 2012;16(9):458-466.
    33 Skelly LR,Decety J.Passive and motivated perception of emotional faces:qualitative and quantitative changes in the face processing network.PLoS One 2012;7(6):e40371.
    34 Mattavelli G,Sormaz M,Flack T,Asghar AU,Fan S,Frey J,Manssuer L,Usten D,Young AW,Andrews TJ.Neural responses to facial expressions support the role of the amygdala in processing threat.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci2014;9(11):1684-1689.
    35 Hinojosa JA,Mercado F,Carretie L.N170 sensitivity to facial expression:A meta-analysis.Neurosci Biobehav Rev2015;55:498-509.
    36 Kragel PA,LaBar KS.Advancing emotion theory with multivariate pattern classification.Emot Rev 2014;6(2):160-174.
    37 Vytal K,Hamann S.Neuroimaging support for discrete neural correlates of basic emotions:a voxel-based metaanalysis.J Cogn Neurosci 2010;22(12):2864-2885.
    38 Alves NT.Recognition of static and dynamic facial expressions:a study review.Estudos De Psicologia 2013;18(1):125-130.
    39 Sarkheil P,Goebel R,Schneider F,Mathiak K.Emotion unfolded by motion:a role for parietal lobe in decoding dynamic facial expressions.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci2013;8(8):950-957.
    40 Foley E,Rippon G,Thai NJ,Longe O,Senior C.Dynamic facial expressions evoke distinct activation in the face perception network:a connectivity analysis study.J Cogn Neurosci 2012;24(2):507-520.
    41 Rahko J,Paakki JJ,Starck T,Nikkinen J,Remes J,Hurtig T,Kuusikko-Gauffin S,Mattila ML,Jussila K,JanssonVerkasalo E,Katsyri J,Sams M,Pauls D,Ebeling H,Moilanen I,Tervonen O,Kiviniemi V.Functional mapping of dynamic happy and fearful facial expression processing in adolescents.Brain Imaging Behav 2010;4(2):164-176.
    42 Trautmann SA,Fehr T,Herrmann M.Emotions in motion:dynamic compared to static facial expressions of disgust and happiness reveal more widespread emotion-specific activations.Brain Res 2009;1284:100-115.
    43 Recio G,Sommer W,Schacht A.Electrophysiological correlates of perceiving and evaluating static and dynamic facial emotional expressions.Brain Res 2011;1376:66-75.
    44 Prochnow D,Kossack H,Brunheim S,Muller K,Wittsack HJ,Markowitsch HJ,Seitz RJ.Processing of subliminal facial expressions of emotion:a behavioral and fMRI study.Soc Neurosci 2013;8(5):448-461.
    45 Rhodes G.The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.Annu Rev Psychol 2006;57:199-226.
    46 Brand RJ,Bonatsos A,D’Orazio R,Deshong H.What is beautiful is good,even online:Correlations between photo attractiveness and text attractiveness in men’s online dating profiles.Comput Hum Behav 2012;28(1):166-170.
    47 Tsukiura T,Cabeza R.Shared brain activity for aesthetic and moral judgments:implications for the Beauty-is-Good stereotype.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2011;6(1):138-148.
    48 Hahn AC,Perrett DI.Neural and behavioral responses to attractiveness in adult and infant faces.Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014;46:591-603.
    49 Lindell AK,Lindell KL.Beauty captures the attention of the beholder.J Cogn Psychol 2014;26(7):768-780.
    50 Silva A,Macedo AF,Albuquerque PB,Arantes J.Always on my mind?Recognition of attractive faces may not depend on attention.Front Psychol 2016;7:53.
    51 Aharon I,Etcoff N,Ariely D,Chabris CF,O’Connor E,Breiter HC.Beautiful faces have variable reward value:fMRI and behavioral evidence.Neuron 2001;32(3):537-551.
    52 Kranz F,Ishai A.Face perception is modulated by sexual preference.Curr Biol 2006;16(1):63-68.
    53 DeWall CN,Maner JK.High status men(but not women)capture the eye of the beholder.Evol Psychol 2008;6(2).DOI:147470490800600209.
    54 Kou H,Su Y,Bi T,Gao X,Chen H.Attentional biases toward face-related stimuli among face dissatisfied women:orienting and maintenance of attention revealed by eye-movement.Front Psychol 2016;7:919.
    55 Shimojo S,Simion C,Shimojo E,Scheier C.Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference.Nat Neurosci 2003;6(12):1317-1322.
    56 Liang X,Zebrowitz LA,Zhang Y.Neural activation in the‘reward circuit’shows a nonlinear response to facial attractiveness.Soc Neurosci 2010;5(3):320-334.
    57 Mende-Siedlecki P,Said CP,Todorov A.The social evaluation of faces:a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2013;8(3):285-299.
    58 Shen H,Chau DKP,Su J,Zeng LL,Jiang W,He J,Fan J,Hu D.Brain responses to facial attractiveness induced by facial proportions:evidence from an fMRI study.Sci Rep2016;6:35905.
    59 Zhang Z,Deng Z.Gender,facial attractiveness,and early and late event-related potential components.J Integr Neurosci 2012;11(4):477-487.
    60 Hooff JCV,Crawford H,Vugt MV.The wandering mind of men:ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2011;6(4):477-485.
    61 Sun D,Chan CC,Fan J,Wu Y,Lee TM.Are happy faces attractive?The roles of early vs.late processing.Front Psychol 2015;6:1812-1826.
    62 Trujillo L,Jankowitsch J,Langlois J.Beauty is in the ease of the beholding:A neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2014;14(3):1061-1076.
    63 Marzi T,Viggiano MP.When memory meets beauty:Insights from event-related potentials.Biol Psychol 2010;84(2):192-205.
    64 Roye A,H?fel L,Jacobsen T.Aesthetics of faces:Behavioral and electrophysiological indices of evaluative and descriptive judgment processes.J Psychophysiol 2008;22(1):41-57.
    65 Cunningham WA,Espinet SD,DeYoung CG,Zelazo PD.Attitudes to the right-and left:frontal ERP asymmetries associated with stimulus valence and processing goals.Neuroimage 2005;28(4):827-834.
    66 Ferrari V,Codispoti M,Cardinale R,Bradley MM.Directed and motivated attention during processing of natural scenes.J Cogn Neurosci 2008;20(10):1753-1761.
    67 Hajcak G,Dunning JP,Foti D.Motivated and controlled attention to emotion:time-course of the late positive potential.Clin Neurophysiol 2009;120(3):505-510.
    68 Dolcos F,Cabeza R.Event-related potentials of emotional memory:encoding pleasant,unpleasant,and neutral pictures.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2002;2(3):252-263.
    69 Foti D,Hajcak G,Dien J.Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures:evidence from temporal-spatial PCA.Psychophysiology 2009;46(3):521-530.
    70 Morgan LK,Kisley MA.The effects of facial attractiveness and perceiver’s mate value on adaptive allocation of central processing resources.Evol Hum Behav 2014;35(2):96-102.
    71 Werheid K,Schacht A,Sommer W.Facial attractiveness modulates early and late event-related brain potentials.Biol Psychol 2007;76(1-2):100-108.
    72 Chen J,Zhong J,Zhang Y,Li P,Zhang A,Tan Q,Li H.Electrophysiological correlates of processing facial attractiveness and its influence on cooperative behavior.Neurosci Lett 2012;517(2):65-70.
    73 Schacht A,Werheid K,Sommer W.The appraisal of facial beauty is rapid but not mandatory.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2008;8(2):132-142.
    74 Chatterjee A,Thomas A,Smith SE,Aguirre GK.The neural response to facial attractiveness.Neuropsychology 2009;23(2):135-143.
    75 Cloutier J,Heatherton TF,Whalen PJ,Kelley WM.Are attractive people rewarding?Sex differences in the neural substrates of facial attractiveness.J Cogn Neurosci 2008;20(6):941-951.
    76 Zhang Y,Wei B,Zhao P,Zheng M,Zhang L.Gender differences in memory processing of female facial attractiveness:evidence from event-related potentials.Neurocase 2016;22(3):317-323.
    77 Zhang Y(张妍),Kong F,Guo Y,Ren J,Chen H.Explicit memory or implicit memory:An ERP study on memory bias toward female facial attractiveness.Acta Sci Nat Univ Pekinensis(北京大学学报自然科学版)2012;48(1):160-168(in Chinese with English abstract).
    78 Ishai A.Sex,beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex.Int JPsychophysiol 2007;63(2):181-185.
    79 Thiruchselvam R,Harper J,Homer AL.Beauty is in the belief of the beholder:cognitive influences on the neural response to facial attractiveness.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci2016;11(12):1999-2008.
    80 Vartanian O,Goel V,Lam E,Fisher M,Granic J.Middle temporal gyrus encodes individual differences in perceived facial attractiveness.Psychol Aesthetics Creativity Arts2013;7(1):38-47.
    81 Kampe KK,Frith CD,Dolan RJ,Frith U.Reward value of attractiveness and gaze.Nature 2001;413(6856):589.
    82 O’Doherty J,Winston J,Critchley H,Perrett D,Burt DM,Dolan RJ.Beauty in a smile:the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness.Neuropsychologia 2003;41(2):147-155.
    83 Carlin JD,Calder AJ.The neural basis of eye gaze processing.Curr Opin Neurobiol 2013;23(3):450-455.
    84 Nummenmaa L,Calder AJ.Neural mechanisms of social attention.Trends Cogn Sci 2009;13(3):135-143.
    85 Pfeiffer UJ,Vogeley K,Schilbach L.From gaze cueing to dual eye-tracking:novel approaches to investigate the neural correlates of gaze in social interaction.Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2013;37(10 Pt 2):2516-2528.
    86 von Grunau M,Anston C.The detection of gaze direction:a stare-in-the-crowd effect.Perception 1995;24(11):1297-1313.
    87 Mason MF,Hood BM,Macrae CN.Look into my eyes:gaze direction and person memory.Memory 2004;12(5):637-643.
    88 Macrae CN,Hood BM,Milne AB,Rowe AC,Mason MF.Are you looking at me?Eye gaze and person perception.Psychol Sci 2002;13(5):460-464.
    89 Senju A,Johnson MH.The eye contact effect:mechanisms and development.Trends Cogn Sci 2009;13(3):127-134.
    90 Burra N,Baker S,George N.Processing of gaze direction within the N170/M170 time window:A combined EEG/MEG study.Neuropsychologia 2017;100:207-219.
    91 Mormann F,Niediek J,Tudusciuc O,Quesada CM,Coenen VA,Elger CE,Adolphs R.Neurons in the human amygdala encode face identity,but not gaze direction.Nat Neurosci2015;18:1568-1570.
    92 Madipakkam AR,Rothkirch M,Guggenmos M,Heinz A,Sterzer P.Gaze direction modulates the relation between neural responses to faces and visual awareness.J Neurosci2015;35(39):13287-13299.
    93 Itier RJ,Batty M.Neural bases of eye and gaze processing:the core of social cognition.Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2009;33(6):843-863.
    94 Wiese E,Buzzell G,Abubshait A,Beatty P.Seeing minds in others:Mind perception modulates social-cognitive performance and relates to ventromedial prefrontal structures.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2018;1:1-20.
    95 Wiese E,Abubshait A,Azarian B,Blumberg EJ.Brain stimulation to left prefrontal cortex modulates mechanisms of social attention.PsyArXiv 2018.DOI:10.31234/osf.io/yfj27.
    96 Sato W,Kochiyama T,Uono S,Toichi M.Neural mechanisms underlying conscious and unconscious attentional shifts triggered by eye gaze.Neuroimage 2016;124:118-126.
    97 Natu VS,Jiang F,Narvekar A,Keshvari S,Blanz V,O’Toole AJ.Dissociable neural patterns of facial identity across changes in viewpoint.J Cogn Neurosci 2010;22(7):1570-1582.
    98 Carlin JD,Calder AJ,Kriegeskorte N,Nili H,Rowe JB.Ahead view-invariant representation of gaze direction in anterior superior temporal sulcus.Curr Biol 2011;21(21):1817-1821.
    99 Calvert GA,Bullmore ET,Brammer MJ,Campbell R,Williams SC,McGuire PK,Woodruff PW,Iversen SD,David AS.Activation of auditory cortex during silent lipreading.Science 1997;276(5312):593-596.
    100 Bernstein LE,Auer ET Jr,Moore JK,Ponton CW,Don M,Singh M.Visual speech perception without primary auditory cortex activation.Neuroreport 2002;13(3):311-315.
    101 Ruytjens L,Albers F,van Dijk P,Wit H,Willemsen A.Neural responses to silent lipreading in normal hearing male and female subjects.Eur J Neurosci 2006;24(6):1835-1844.
    102 Mcgurk H,Macdonald J.Hearing lips and seeing voices.Nature 1976;264(5588):746-748.
    103 Komeilipoor N,Cesari P,Daffertshofer A.Involvement of superior temporal areas in audiovisual and audiomotor speech integration.Neuroscience 2017;343:276-283.
    104 Grant KW,Seitz PF.The use of visible speech cues for improving auditory detection of spoken sentences.J Acoust Soc Am 2000;108(3 Pt 1):1197-1208.
    105 Rudmann DS,McCarley JS,Kramer AF.Bimodal displays improve speech comprehension in environments with multiple speakers.Hum Factors 2003;45(2):329-336.
    106 Wu C,Cao S,Wu X,Li L.Temporally pre-presented lipreading cues release speech from informational masking.J Acoust Soc Am 2013;133(4):EL281-EL285.
    107 Helfer KS,Freyman RL.The role of visual speech cues in reducing energetic and informational masking.J Acoust Soc Am 2005;117(2):842-849.
    108 Paulesu E,Perani D,Blasi V,Silani G,Borghese NA,De Giovanni U,Sensolo S,Fazio F.A functional-anatomical model for lipreading.J Neurophysiol 2003;90(3):2005-2013.
    109 Skipper JI,Nusbaum HC,Small SL.Listening to talking faces:motor cortical activation during speech perception.Neuroimage 2005;25(1):76-89.
    110 Zhang MC(张美晨),Wei P,Zhang Q.The impact of supraand sub-liminal facial expressions on the gaze-cueing effect.Acta Psychol Sin(心理学报)2015;47(11):1309-1317(in Chinese with English abstract).
    111 Nomi JS,Uddin LQ.Face processing in autism spectrum disorders:From brain regions to brain networks.Neuropsychologia 2015;71:201-216.
    112 Pelphrey KA,Morris JP,McCarthy G.Neural basis of eye gaze processing deficits in autism.Brain 2005;128(Pt 5):1038-1048.
    113 Ewbank MP,Pell PJ,Powell TE,von dem Hagen EAH,Baron-Cohen S,Calder AJ.Repetition suppression and memory for faces is reduced in adults with autism spectrum conditions.Cereb Cortex 2017;27(1):92-103.
    114 Kleinhans NM,Richards T,Greenson J,Dawson G,Aylward E.Altered dynamics of the fMRI response to faces in individuals with autism.J Autism Dev Disord 2016;46(1):232-241.
    115 Norton D,McBain R,Holt DJ,Ongur D,Chen Y.Association of impaired facial affect recognition with basic facial and visual processing deficits in schizophrenia.Biol Psychiatry 2009;65(12):1094-1098.
    116 Lee CU,Shenton ME,Salisbury DF,Kasai K,Onitsuka T,Dickey CC,Yurgelun-Todd D,Kikinis R,Jolesz FA,McCarley RW.Fusiform gyrus volume reduction in first-episode schizophrenia:a magnetic resonance imaging study.Arch Gen Psychiatry 2002;59(9):775-781.
    117 Quintana J,Wong T,Ortiz-Portillo E,Marder SR,Mazziotta JC.Right lateral fusiform gyrus dysfunction during facial information processing in schizophrenia.Biol Psychiatry2003;53(12):1099-1112.
    118 Onitsuka T,Niznikiewicz MA,Spencer KM,Frumin M,Kuroki N,Lucia LC,Shenton ME,McCarley RW.Functional and structural deficits in brain regions subserving face perception in schizophrenia.Am J Psychiatry 2006;163(3):455-462.
    119 Wu C,Li H,Tian Q,Wu X,Wang C,Li L.Disappearance of the unmasking effect of temporally pre-presented lipreading cues on speech recognition in people with chronic schizophrenia.Schizophr Res 2013;150(2-3):594-595.
    120 Zheng Y,Wu C,Li J,Wu H,She S,Liu S,Mao L,Ning Y,Li L.Brain substrates of perceived spatial separation between speech sources under simulated reverberant listening conditions in schizophrenia.Psychol Med 2016;46(3):477-491.
    121 Li J,Wu C,Zheng Y,Li R,Li X,She S,Wu H,Peng H,Ning Y,Li L.Schizophrenia affects speech-induced functional connectivity of the superior temporal gyrus under cocktail-party listening conditions.Neuroscience 2017;359:248-257.
    122 Wu C,Zheng Y,Li J,Wu H,She S,Liu S,Ning Y,Li L.Brain substrates underlying auditory speech priming in healthy listeners and listeners with schizophrenia.Psychol Med 2017;47(5):837-852.
    123 Wu C,Zheng Y,Li J,Zhang B,Li R,Wu H,She S,Liu S,Peng H,Ning Y,Li L.Activation and functional connectivity of the left inferior temporal gyrus during visual speech priming in healthy listeners and listeners with schizophrenia.Front Neurosci 2017;11:107.
    124 Bi T,Chen J,Zhou T,He Y,Fang F.Function and structure of human left fusiform cortex are closely associated with perceptual learning of faces.Curr Biol 2014;24(2):222-227.
    125 Du YY,Zhang F,Wang YC,Bi TY,Qiu J.Perceptual learning of facial expressions.Vis Res 2016;128:19-29.