帽儿山地区樟子松优良种源的选择
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The superior provenance selection of Mongolian scotch pine(Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica)forests at Maoershan area
  • 作者:徐静 ; 孙洪志 ; 郭滨德
  • 英文作者:XU Jing;SUN Hongzhi;GUO Binde;Center for Ecological Research, College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University;
  • 关键词:樟子松 ; 生长性状 ; 种源选择
  • 英文关键词:Mongolian scotch pine(Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica);;growth traits;;provenances selection
  • 中文刊名:NJLY
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
  • 机构:东北林业大学林学院生态研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2017-01-16 10:51
  • 出版单位:南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.41;No.187
  • 基金:黑龙江省自然科学基金项目(C201210)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:NJLY201701010
  • 页数:8
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:32-1161/S
  • 分类号:65-72
摘要
【目的】进一步揭示不同种源樟子松在帽儿山地区的生长差异性,选择出优良种源。【方法】以1981年采种、1982年育苗、1984年春造林到帽儿山地区的高峰、图强、卡伦山、红花尔基、罕达盖、金山、阿尔山等7个种源31年生樟子松试验林为研究对象,通过对樟子松胸径、树高、材积、冠幅、年轮宽度及保存率等6个生长性状进行方差分析、多重比较、相关性分析、主成分分析等,选择优良种源。【结果】种源间胸径达到极显著差异(P<001),材积和冠幅达到显著差异(P<005),树高没有显著差异(P>005);区组间各性状均没有显著差异(P>005)。图强种源的年轮宽度最大(369 mm),保存率则最小(5667%);不同种源胸径、树高、材积、冠幅及年轮宽度与原产地地理气候因子之间没有显著相关性。樟子松种源各性状地理变异模式不明显,而保存率与纬度呈极显著负相关(P<001),与经度呈显著负相关(P<005),与海拔呈显著正相关(P<005);主成分分析结果发现,图强种源综合指数得分最高(2972)。【结论】31年生樟子松人工林生长性状不同种源之间存在差异,红花尔基、高峰种源生长较好;图强种源表现最好,应用潜力大。
        【Objective】The experiment was conducted to study the differences of growth traits among seven provenances(GF, TQ, KLS, HHEJ, HDG, JS and AES) and geographic variation to select superior provenances. 【Method】In thisstudy, seeds of Mongolian scotch pine(Pinus sylvestrisvar.mongolica) from 7 provenances were collected in 1981,seedlings were cultured in 1982 and planted in 1984 at Maoer Mountain. In 2015, we investigated the DBH, height, vol-ume, crown width, ring width and survival rate of 31-year-old Mongolian scotch pine at Maoershan area. The superiorprovenance was selected by using variance analysis, multiple comparisons, correlation analysis and principal componentanalysis. 【Results】 The DBH exhibited extremely significant difference(P< 0. 01), the volume and crown widthexhibited significant difference(P< 0. 05), the height exhibited no significant difference among the differentprovenances. All the investigated traits showed no significant differences among different blocks. The tree ring width fromTuqiang provenance was maximum(3.69 mm) while its survival rate was minimum(56.67%). The DBH, height, vol-ume, crown width and ring width didnt significantly correlated to latitude and longitude of provenances, except for thesurvival rate which significantly and negatively correlated to latitude(P< 0. 01) and longitude(P< 0. 05), andsignificantly and positively correlated(P<0.05) to altitude. Therefore the genetic variation of Mongolian scotch pine wasnot obvious among the various traits. According to the principal component analysis, the composite index score of Tu-qiang provenance was the highest(2.972). 【Conclusion】The growth traits of 31 year old Mongolian scotch pine showeddifferences among different provenances which of the Tuqiang provenance was best, and the HHEJ and GF provenanceswere better than that of the others. The Tuqiang provenance showed the best application potential at Maoershan area.
引文
[1]刘青华,张蕊,金国庆,等.马尾松年轮宽度和木材基本密度的种源变异及早期选择[J].林业科学,2010,46(5):49-54.LIU Q H,ZHANG R,JIN G Q,et al.Variation of ring width andwood basic density and early selection ofPinus massonianaprove-nances[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2010,46(5):49-54.
    [2]BAMBER R K,BURLEY J.The wood properties of radiata pine[J].Wood Properties of Radiata Pine,1983:1-84.
    [3]MEGRAW R A.Wood quality factors in loblolly pine[M].Geor-gia:TAPPI Press Atlanta,1985:1-88.
    [4]赵颖,周志春,吴吉富,等.马尾松优良种源对磷肥的生长反应和肥效持续性[J].林业科学,2007,43(10):64-70.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2007.10.011.ZHAO Y,ZHOU Z C,WU J F,et al.Growth response ofsuperior provenance of masson pine to phosphorus supply and per-sistence of phosphorus effect[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2007,43(10):64-70.
    [5]梁一池,邢建宏,刘希华,等.25年生马尾松种源遗传变异及选择研究[J].三明学院学报,2007,24(2):121-126.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-4343.2007.02.001.LIANG Y C,XING J H,LIU X H,et al.Genetic variations andselection ofPinus massonianaprovenance in a 25-year-old testingplantation[J].Journal of Sannming University,2007,24(2):121-126.
    [6]毛爱华,李建祥,张超英,等.19年生侧柏种源变异及选择研究[J].北京林业大学报,2010,32(1):63-68.DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.2010.01.020.MAO A H,LI J X,ZHANG C Y,et al.Geographic variation andprovenance selection ofPlatycladus orientalisin a 19-year-old tes-ting plantation[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University,2010,32(1):63-68.
    [7]CHUCHALA D,ORLOWSKI K A,SANDAK A,et al.The effectof wood provenance and density on cutting forces while sawingScots pine(Pinus sylvestrisL.)[J].Bioresources,2014,9(3):5349-5361.
    [8]DANUSEVI I D,GABRILAVI I R.Variation in juvenile growthrhythm amongPicea abiesprovenances from the baltic states andthe adjacent regions[J].Scandinavian Journal of ForestResearch,2001,16(4):305-317.DOI:10.1080/713785149.
    [9]FALKENHAGEN E R.Thirty five-year results from sevenPinus elliottii(Engelman.)andPinus taeda(L.)provenance trials inSouth Africa[J].South African Forestry Journal,1978,107:22-36.DOI:10.1080/20702620.1978.10433502.
    [10]BLUMENROTHER M,BACHMANN M,MULLER-STARCK G.Genetic characters and diameter growth of provenances of Scotspine(Pinus sylvestrisL.)[J].Silvae Genetica,2001,50(5-6):212-222.
    [11]SHUTYAEV A M,GIERTYCH M.Genetic subdivisions of therange of Scots pine(Pinus sylvestrisL.)based on a transcontinen-tal provenance experiment.[J].Silvae Genetica,2000,49(3):137-151.
    [12]TAUER C G,LOO-DINKINS J A.Seed source variation in spe-cific gravity of loblolly pinegrown in a common environment in Ar-kansas[J].Forest Science,1990,36(4):1133-1145.
    [13]康宏樟,朱教君,许美玲.沙地樟子松人工林营林技术研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(7):799-806.DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2005.0044.KANG H Z,ZHU J J,XU M L.Silviculture of Mongolian pine(Pinus sylvestrisvar.mongolica)plantations on sandy land[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2005,24(7):799-806.
    [14]全国杉木种源试验协作组.杉木造林区种源选择[J].林业科学研究,1988,1(1):1-13.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.1988.01.002.National Collaborative Research Group.Provenance trial ofChinese fir(Cunningamia lanceolata(Lamb.))Hook forplanting area in China[J].Forest Research,1988,1(1):1-13.
    [15]周志春,傅玉狮,吴天林.马尾松生长和材性的地理遗传变异及最优种源区的划定[J].林业科学研究,1993,7(5):556-564.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.1993.05.015.ZHOU Z C,FU Y S,WU T L.Geographic variation in growthand wood properties and determination of the optimum provenanceregion for paper-pulp wood of masson pine[J].Forest Research,1993,7(5):556-564.
    [16]李书靖,周建文,刘健.油松地理变异及种源选择的研究[J].林业科学研究,1991,4(6):650-655.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.1991.06.012.LI S J,ZHOU J W,LIU J.Geographic variation and provenanceselection ofPinus tabulaeformis[J].Forest Research,1991,4(6):650-655.
    [17]杨传平,姜静,唐盛松,等.帽儿山地区21年生兴安落叶松种源试验[J].东北林业大学学报,2002,30(6):1-5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2002.06.001.YANG C P,JIANG J,TANG S S,et al.The provenance test of21-year oldLarix gmeliniiat Maoershan area[J].Journal ofNortheast Forestry University,2002,30(6):1-5.
    [18]王殿金,徐树堂,宋晓东,等.樟子松沙地种源试验[J].防护林科技,2008(2):9-11.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215.2008.02.004.WANG D J,XU S T,SONG X D,et al.Provenances test ofPinus sylvestrisvar.mongolicaon sand land[J].Protection ForestScience and Technology,2008(2):9-11.
    [19]周文飞,李继有,白子红,等.榆林沙区樟子松造林技术[J].防护林科技,2012(6):111-112.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215.2012.06.050.ZHOU W F,LI J Y,BAI Z H,et al.Study on afforestation tech-niques ofPinus sylvestrisLinn.var.mongolicaLitv.in Yulin sandyland[J].Protection Forest Science and Technolog,2012(6):111-112.
    [20]ZHU J J,FAN Z P,ZENG D H,et al.Comparison of standstructure and growth between artificial and natural forests ofPinus sylvestirisvar.mongolicaon sandy land[J].Journal of ForestryResearch,2003,14(2):103-111.DOI:10.1007/BF02856774.
    [21]焦树仁.科尔沁沙地针叶树造林技术研究[J].内蒙古林业科技,2001(3):31-36.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-4066.2001.03.011.JIAO S R.Afforestation technology of needle leaved trees in Keer-qin sandy land[J].Inner Mongolia Forestry Science&Technolo-gy,2001(3):31-36.
    [22]焦树仁,宋保民,王明智,等.内蒙古奈曼旗兴隆沼林场针叶树引种造林试验[J].内蒙古林业科技,2000(2):23-25.JIAO S R,SONG B M,WANG M Z,et al.Experiments on affor-estation by introduction coniferous trees in Xinglongzhao ForestFarm,Naiman Banner,Inner Mongolia[J].Inner Mongolia For-estry Science&Technology,2000(2):23-25.
    [23]焦树仁.樟子松人工林蒸腾耗水量的初步研究[J].生态学杂志,1984,3(4):15-18.DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.1984.0084.JIAO S R.A preliminary study on the evapotranspiration intensityof artificial Mongolian pine forest[J].Chinese Journal ofEcology,1984,3(4):15-18.
    [24]曾德慧,姜凤岐,范志平,等.樟子松人工固沙林稳定性的研究[J].应用生态学报,1996,7(4):337-343.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.1996.0067.ZENG D H,JIANG F Q,FAN Z P,et al.Stability of Mongolianpine plantation on sandy land[J].Chinese Journal of Applied E-cology,1996,7(4):337-343.
    [25]吴祥云,姜凤岐,李晓丹,等.樟子松人工固沙林衰退的主要特征[J].应用生态学报,2004,15(12):2221-2224.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2004.0458.WU X Y,JIANG F Q,LI X D,et al.Major features of decline ofPinus sylvestrisvar.mongolicaplantation on sandy land[J].Chi-nese Journal of Applied Ecology,1996,7(4):337-343.
    [26]杨金艳,王传宽.东北东部森林生态系统土壤碳贮量和碳通量[J].生态学报,2005,25(11):2875-2882.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.11.012.YANG J Y,WANG C K.Soil carbon storage and flux oftemperate forest ecosystems in northeastern China[J].Acta Eco-logica Sinica,2005,25(11):2875-2882.
    [27]WANG C K,HAN Y,CHEN J,et al.Seasonality of soil CO2ef-flux in a temperate forest:biophysical effects of snowpack andspring freeze-thaw cycles[J].Agricultural&Forest Meteorology,2013,177(15):83-92.DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.04.008.
    [28]刘桂丰,褚延广,时玉龙,等.17年生帽儿山地区樟子松种源试验[J].东北林业大学学报,2003,31(4):1-3.LIU G F,CHU Y G,SHI Y L,et al.The provenance test of 17-year-oldPinus sylvestrisvar.mongolicaat Maoershan area[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2003,31(4):1-3.
    [29]朱宇,刘兆刚,金光泽.大兴安岭天然落叶松林单木健康评价[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(5):1320-1328.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0294.ZHU Y,LIU Z G,JIN G Z.Health assessment of individual treesin naturalLarix gmeliniiforest Great Xing′an Mountains of China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2013,24(5):1320-1328.
    [30]张桂芹,刘跃杰,姜秀煜,等.蒙古栎种源生长性状的遗传变异及优良种源选择[J].东北林业大学学报,2015,43(4):5-7.DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2015.04.001.ZHANG G Q,LIU Y J,JIANG X Y,et al.Genetic variation ofgrowth traits in Mongolian oak provenance and its excellent prove-nance selection[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,2015,43(4):5-7.
    [31]方晓雨,张宏琴,姜超,等.3种乔木叶片反射光谱与光合特性随树高的变化[J].应用与环境生物学报,2013(2):383-388.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00383.FANG X Y,ZHANG H Q,JIANG C,et al.Changes in leafspectral reflectance and photosynthetic characteristics with treeheight in three tree species[J].Chinese Journal of Applied andEnvironmental Biology,2013(2):383-388.
    [32]赵俊卉,亢新刚,张慧东,等.长白山主要针叶树种胸径和树高变异系数与竞争因子的关系[J].应用生态学报,2009,20(8):1832-1837.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2009.0300.ZHAO J H,KANG X G,ZHANG H D,et al.Relationships be-tween coefficient of variation of diameter and height and competi-tion index of main coniferous trees in Changbai Mountains[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2009,20(8):1832-1837.
    [33]杨书文,夏德安,孙洪志,等.长白落叶松遗传参数的估算及优良家系的综合选择[J].东北林业大学学报,1991,19(S2):46-53.DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.1991.s2.008.YANG S W,XIA D A,SUN H Z,et al.Estimation on genetic paraneter and comprehensive selection for superior families ofLarix olgensis[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,1991,19(S2):46-53.
    [34]杨亚莉,蒋丽娟,向祖恒,等.龙山县八面山华榛人工林造林成效分析[J].湖南林业科技,2014,41(3):46-50.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-5710.2014.03.011.YANG Y L,JIANG L J,XIANG Z H,et al.Analysis of plantation ofCorylus chinensisat Bamian Mountain in Longshan County[J].Hunan Forestry Science&Technology,2014,41(3):46-50.
    [35]叶晓霞,徐肇友,王帮顺,等.不同枫香种源造林实验及优良种源选择[J].浙江林业科技,2013,33(2):71-74.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2013.02.017.YE X X,XU Z Y,WANG B S,et al.Genetic variations ofgrowth traits in differentLiquidambar formosanaprovenances andselection[J].Journal of Zhejiang Forestry Science&Technology,2013,33(2):71-74.
    [36]刘彦辉.半干旱地区植苗造林深浅度对造林成活率影响的分析[J].防护林科技,2002(3):21-22.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215.2002.03.008.LIU Y H.Effect of planting depth on survival rate in semi-aridarea[J].Protection Forest Science and Technology,2002(3):21-22.
    [37]夏德安,许忠志,侯丹,等.胡桃楸种源遗传变异规律的研究[J].安徽农业科学,2014,42(31):10956-10958.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2014.31.046.XIA D A,XU Z Z,HOU D,et al.Study on genetic variation lawofJuglans mandshuricaprovenances[J].Journal of Anhui agri-culture Science,2014,42(31):10956-10958.
    [38]徐立安,陈天华.马尾松种源子代材性变异与制浆造纸材优良种源选择[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),1997,21(2):1-6.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.1997.02.01.XU L A,CHEN T H.Variation of provenance progenies in woodproperty and provenance selection for pulpwood of masson pine[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences E-dition),1997,21(2):1-6.
    [39]谢虎风,何其智,龙作义.光周期对塑料大棚樟子松育苗的效应[J].东北林业大学学报,1983,11(4):57-63.DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.1983.04.008.XIE H F,HE Q Z,LONG Z Y.Function of photoperiodism forseedlings of Scotch pine(Pinus sylvestrisvar.mongolica)in glass-house[J].Journal of Northeast Forestry University,1983,11(4):57-63.
    [40]尤文忠,苑辉,云丽丽,等.沙地樟子松天然更新与降水因子的灰色关联度分析[J].辽宁林业科技,2002(2):4-5.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2002.02.002.YOU W Z,YUAN H,YUN L L,et al.The gray correlative anal-ysis on the relationship between the natural regeneration and theprecipitation forPinus sylvestrisvar.mongolicaplantation in sandyland[J].Journal of Liaoning Forestry Science&Technology,2002(2):4-5.
    [41]曾德慧,尤文忠,范志平,等.樟子松人工固沙林天然更新障碍因子分析[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(3):257-261.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2002.0061.ZENG D H,YOU W Z,FAN Z P,et al.Analysis of natural re-generation barriers ofPinus sylvestrisvar.mongolicaplantation onsandy land[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2002,13(3):257-261.
    [42]周凤艳,王国晨.沙地樟子松不同切根密度育苗的研究[J].防护林科技,2000(4):7-8.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215.2000.04.003.ZHOU F Y,WANG G C.Density-test on root cutting of seedlingsofPinus sylvestrisvar.mongolicain sandy nursery[J].ProtectionForest Science and Technology,2000(4):7-8.