郑州常见乔木树种生态服务价值分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Ecological Service Value of Arbor Tree Species in Zhengzhou
  • 作者:张亚民 ; 张根梅 ; 白保勋 ; 焦书道
  • 英文作者:Zhang Yamin;Zhang Genmei;Bai Baoxun;Jiao Shudao;Zhengzhou Greening Engineering Management Office;Henan Province Workers Cultural Palace;Zhengzhou Agriculture and Forestry Science Institute;Zhengzhou Urban Landscape Science Institute;
  • 关键词:乔木树种 ; 生态服务价值 ; 聚类分析 ; 主成分分析 ; 树种选择 ; 郑州市
  • 英文关键词:arbor tree species;;ecological service value;;cluster analysis;;principal component analysis;;tree species selection;;Zhengzhou
  • 中文刊名:ZNTB
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin
  • 机构:郑州市绿化工程管理处;河南省工人文化宫;郑州市农林科学研究所;郑州市城市园林科学研究所;
  • 出版日期:2018-05-05
  • 出版单位:中国农学通报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.34;No.484
  • 基金:农业基础性长期性科技工作“国家农业环境数据中心观测监测项目”(ZX03S1707);; 国家农业科技成果转化资金项目“观赏及油料接骨木良种中试与示范”(2013GB2D000294);; 郑州市重点科技攻关项目“郑州都市农业生态服务价值评估与生态补偿方法研究”(20130244)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZNTB201813009
  • 页数:7
  • CN:13
  • ISSN:11-1984/S
  • 分类号:56-62
摘要
为探讨绿化树种量化选择方法,观测计算郑州市常见的16个乔木树种年生长量、固碳释氧量、固土保肥量、涵养水源量、积累营养量与净化空气功能及其价值,采用聚类与主成分分析法,对不同树种的生态服务价值进行了分析。结果表明:生态价值较高的树种为银杏(Ginkgo biloba)、悬铃木(Platanus acerifolia)、白蜡(Fraxinus chinensis)、国槐(Sophora japonica)与枇杷(Eriobotrya japonica);生态服务价值较低的树种为黄山栾(Koelreuteria bipinnata)、女贞(Ligustrum lucidum)、雪松(Cedrus deodara)、圆柏(Sabina chinensis)与侧柏(Platycladus orientalis);其他树种生态服务价值中等。建议在造林绿化中优先选择生态服务价值较高的树种。
        The paper aims to explore the quantitative selection method of green tree species. Sixteen common tree species were selected as the research materials in Zhengzhou, the growth and value of carbon fixation and oxygen release, soil reinforcement and fertility maintenance, water conservation, nutrient accumulation and air purification of these tree species were calculated. Then cluster analysis and principal component analysis were used to examine ecological service value. The results showed that Ginkgo biloba had the highest carbon sequestration content, followed by Platanus acerifolia, Fraxinus chinensis, Sophora japonica, Eriobotrya japonica; Koelreuteria bipinnata, Ligustrum lucidum, Cedrus deodara, Sabina chinensis and Platycladus orientalis had the lowest ecological service value; the other trees had medium ecological service value. The tree species with higher ecological service value are recommended for afforestation in Zhengzhou.
引文
[1]郭浩,王兵,马向前,等.中国油松林生态服务功能评估[J].中国科学(C辑:生命科学),2008,38(6):565-572.
    [2]和爱军.浅析日本的森林公益机能经济价值评价[J].中南林业调查规划,2002,21(2):48-54.
    [3]潘韬,吴绍洪,戴尔阜,等.基于In VEST模型的三江源区生态系统水源供给服务时空变化[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(1):183-189.
    [4]王兵,鲁绍伟,尤文忠,等.辽宁省森林生态系统服务价值评估[J].应用生态学报,2010,21(7):1792-1798.
    [5]靳芳,鲁绍伟,余新晓,等.中国森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评价[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(8):1531-1536.
    [6]Anderson B J,Armsworth P R,Eigenbrod F,et al.Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystemservice priorities[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2009,46:888-896.
    [7]Brendan F,Turner R K,Burgess N D,et al.Measuring,modeling and mapping ecosystem services in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania[J].Progress in Physical Geography,2011,35:595-611.
    [8]Burkhard B,Kroll F,Müller F,et al.Landscapes’capacities to provide ecosystem services:A concept for landcover based assessments[J].Landscape Online,2009,15:1-22.
    [9]Burkhard B,Kroll F,Nedkov S,et al.Mapping ecosystem service supply,demand and budgets[J].Ecological Indicators,2012,21:17-29.
    [10]Chen L,Xie G D,Zhang C S,et al.Modelling ecosystem water supply services across the Lancang River Basin[J].Journal of Resources and Ecology,2011,2:322-327.
    [11]Fisher B,Turner R K,Zylstra M,et al.Ecosystem services and economic theory:Integration for policy-relevant research[J].Ecological Applications,2008,18:2050-2067.
    [12]Nelson E,Mendoza G,Regetz J,et al.Modeling multiple ecosystem services,biodiversity conservation,commodity production,and tradeoffs at landscape scales[J].Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2009,7:4-11.
    [13]Niu X,Wang B,Liu S R,et al.Economical assessment of forest ecosystem services in China:Characteristics and Implications[J].Ecological Complexity,2012,11:1-11.
    [14]宋力,何兴元,陈玮,等.沈阳城市森林树种综合评价指标体系[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报,2007,26(1):136-139.
    [15]刘晓瑜,侯碧青.用AHP法选择株洲市城市道路观赏植物[J].湖南林业科技,2007,32(4):39-41.
    [16]周繇.长白山区野生木本观赏树木调查[J].浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版,2004,30(5):524-535.
    [17]曹基武,刘春林,祁承经,等.壶瓶山国家级自然保护区野生观赏木本植物资源及其开发利用[J].福建林业科技,2008,35(1):192-196.
    [18]张宝鑫,张治明,李延明.北京地区园林树种选择和应用研究[J].中国园林,2009,4:94-98.
    [19]张茂钦,左显东.退耕还林地造林树种选择的探讨[J].西部林业科学,2004,1:38-43.
    [20]孙永贵,陈启玉,张天学,等.乡土树种的选择与价值浅析[J].中国西部科技,2008,15:51.
    [21]李永林,张继善.造林树种选择及配置的思考[J].现代园艺,2012,23:35-36.
    [22]鲍士旦.土壤农化分析(第三版)[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:257-282.
    [23]国家林业局.森林生态系统服务功能评估规范[M].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
    [24]张朝阳,许桂芳.利用隶属函数法对4种地被植物的耐热性综合评价[J].草业科学,2009,26(2):57-60.
    [25]周广生,梅方竹,周竹青,等.小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测[J].中国农业科学,2003,36(11):1378-1382.