青年人肠道中双歧杆菌的分离及其在发酵羊乳中的应用
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Isolation and identification of Bifidobacteria from feces of young volunteers and their application in the fermented goat milk
  • 作者:许小玲 ; 董蕴 ; 单春会 ; 蔡文超 ; 张振东 ; 郭壮
  • 英文作者:XU Xiaoling;DONG Yun;SHAN Chunhui;CAI Wenchao;ZHANG Zhendong;GUO Zhuang;Northwest Hubei Research Institute of Traditional Fermented Food, College of Food Science and Technology, Hubei University of Arts and Science;Food College, Shihezi University;
  • 关键词:双歧杆菌 ; 分离鉴定 ; 发酵羊乳 ; 品质评价
  • 英文关键词:Bifidobacterium;;isolation and identification;;fermented goat milk;;quality evaluation
  • 中文刊名:SSPJ
  • 英文刊名:Food Science and Technology
  • 机构:湖北文理学院食品科学技术学院鄂西北传统发酵食品研究所;石河子大学食品学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-20
  • 出版单位:食品科技
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.44;No.328
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(31501455);; 湖北省自然科学基金计划项目(2016CFB527);; 新疆生产建设兵团重点领域创新团队建设计划项目(2017CB012);; 湖北文理学院学科开放基金项目(XK2018012)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:SSPJ201902002
  • 页数:7
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:11-3511/TS
  • 分类号:11-17
摘要
在对湖北省襄阳地区青年人肠道中双歧杆菌进行分离鉴定的基础上,采用电子舌和电子鼻技术对其在羊乳中的发酵特性进行了评价。结果表明:分离出的20株双歧杆菌菌株,共鉴定为Bifidobacterium longum(长双歧杆菌)、B. breve(短双歧杆菌)、B. bifidum(两歧双歧杆菌)、B.pseudocatenulatum(假链状双歧杆菌)、B. adolescentis(青春双歧杆菌)和B. faecale(粪便双歧杆菌)6个种,其中11株为B. longum(长双歧杆菌)。通过电子舌分析发现,不同双歧杆菌制备的发酵羊乳在后味A(涩味的回味)上的差异最大,极差值为24.52。通过高效液相色谱法分析发现,乳酸和乙酸为双歧杆菌制备发酵羊乳中的主要有机酸。通过电子鼻分析发现,传感器W6S、W1W和W5S对不同双歧杆菌菌株制备发酵羊乳响应值差异较大,其变异值分别为35.56%、23.32%和17.20%。通过主成分分析发现,B. longum HBUAS55095和B. longum HBUAS55100具有良好的羊乳发酵特性。由此可见,B. longum(长双歧杆菌)为襄阳地区青年人肠道中双歧杆菌类群的优势种,且不同双歧杆菌制备的发酵羊乳品质差异主要体现在滋味上。
        In this study, the Bifidobacterial strains were isolated and identified from feces of young volunteers recruited from Xiangyang Hubei province, and their fermentation characteristic were evaluated by electronic tongue and electronic nose technologies. The results indicated that 20 Bifidobacterial strains, were identified as Bifidobacterium longum, B. breve, B. bifidum, B. pseudocatenulatum, B.adolescentis and B. faecale, respectively. It was worth mentioning that 11 isolates were identified as B.longum. The testing of electronic tongue indicated that there was greater difference in sourness among fermented goat milk samples with range values of 24.52. The composition of organic acid was determined by High performance liquid chromatography(HPLC) method, and the result shown that lactic acid and acetic acid were majority organic acids in fermented goat milk samples. The testing of electronic nose indicated that the response value of sensor W6S, W1W and W5S were greater differences among fermented goat milk samples with variation value of 35.56%, 23.32% and 17.20%. The result of principal component analysis indicated that the fermented goat milk samples fermented by B. longum HBUAS55095 and B. longum HBUAS55100 with better quality. Thus, B. longum was domain Bifidobacterial species in young volunteers recruited from Xiangyang, and the differences among fermented goat milk fermented by Bifidobacterial strains were major in taste indexes.
引文
[1]Lee J H,O’Sullivan D J.Genomic insights into bifidobacteria[J].Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews,2010,74(3):378-416.
    [2]Liu Y,Chen W,Yu Y,et al.Identification and characterisation of bifidobacteria in infant formula milk powder obtained from the Chinese market[J].International Dairy Journal,2018,80(5):8-16.
    [3]Sun Z,Zhang W,Guo C,et al.Comparative genomic analysis of 45 type strains of the genus Bifidobacterium:a snapshot of its genetic diversity and evolution[J].PLoSOne,2015,10(2):e0117912.
    [4]Ventura M,Canchaya C,Tauch A,et al.Genomics of actinobacteria:tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum[J].Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews,2007,71(3):495-548.
    [5]Mantziari A,Aakko J,Kumar H,et al.The impact of storage conditions on the stability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium anima lis subsp.lactis Bb12 in human milk[J].Breastfeeding Medicine,2017,12(9):566-569.
    [6]Sun Z,Chen X,Wang J,et al.Complete genome sequence of probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp.lactis strain V9[J].Journal of Bacteriology,2010,192(15):4080-4081.
    [7]高佳媛,邵玉宇,王毕妮,等.羊奶及其制品的研究进展[J].中国乳品工业,2017,45(1):34-38.
    [8]陈合,王娟,季丽媛,等.接种量对嗜酸乳杆菌和长双歧杆菌发酵羊乳的影响[J].食品科技,2013,38(5):14-17.
    [9]曹吉利,谭源,惠翌昕,等.发酵羊乳产抗氧化肽益生乳杆菌的筛选[J].食品科技,2017,42(12):6-10.
    [10]Valente N,Rudnitskaya A,Oliveira J,et al.Cheeses made from raw and pasteurized cow’s milk analysed by an electronic nose and an electronic tongue[J].Sensors,2018,18(8):2415.
    [11]Hu G,Zheng Y,Liu Z,et al.Effects of UV-C and singleand multiple-cycle high hydrostatic pressure treatments on flavor evolution of cow milk:gas chromatographymass spectrometry,electronic nose,and electronic tongue analyses[J].International Journal of Food Properties,20(7):1677-1688.
    [12]Wei Z,Zhang W,Wang Y,et al.Monitoring the fermentation,post-ripeness and storage processes of set yogurt using voltammetric electronic tongue[J].Journal of Food Engineering,2017,203(6):41-52.
    [13]Tian H,Shen Y,Yu H,et al.Effects of 4 Probiotic strains in coculture with traditional starters on the flavor profile of yogurt[J].Journal of Food Science,2017,82(7):1693-1701.
    [14]龚虹,刘斌,冯谦,等.鄂尔多斯婴儿粪便中动物双歧杆菌的分离鉴定与特性研究[J].中国微生态学杂志,2014,26(4):416-419.
    [15]张秋雪,刘晓婵,朱宗涛,等.婴儿粪便长双歧杆菌的分离与多样性分析[J].食品科学,2017,38(24):8-14.
    [16]王玉荣,张俊英,胡欣洁,等.湖北孝感和四川成都地区来源的酒曲对米酒滋味品质影响的评价[J].食品科学,2015,36(16):207-210.
    [17]田辉,孙懿琳,周元良,等.高效液相色谱法测定酸乳中四种有机酸[J].食品与机械,2012,28(5):87-90.
    [18]杨成聪,沈馨,马雪伟,等.高效液相色谱法测定米酒中有机酸的含量[J].食品研究与开发,2018,39(10):116-123.
    [19]杨成聪,刘丹丹,葛东颖,等.基于气相色谱-质谱联用技术结合电子鼻评价浸米时间对黄酒风味品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业,2018,44(8):265-270.