不同学科学术性论文和综述评论性论文的零被引率分析
|
摘要
【目的】分析不同学科学术性论文和综述评论性论文的零被引率。【方法】选取4个被引半衰期相差较大的学科,从Web of Science中获取各学科2008年发表的学术性论文和综述评论性论文在发表后10年间的被引频次,研究其零被引率的变化情况。【结果】所选4个学科学术性论文和综述评论性论文在发表当年的零被引率均高于60%,随后逐年下降并趋于平稳,发表10年后零被引率稳定在10%以下;不同类型文献的零被引率差异明显;不同学科的零被引率均有所不同,被引半衰期越长的学科,其学术性论文零被引率越高。【结论】不同学科学术性论文和综述评论性论文的零被引率变化规律存在差异。
[Purposes]This paper aims to analyze the zero citation rates of articles and reviews in different disciplines. [Methods]We selected four disciplines with significant differences in the cited half-life,obtained the 10-year citation frequency of the articles and reviews in various disciplines published in 2008 from the Web of Science,and studied the changes of their zero citation rates.[Findings]The zero citation rates of articles and reviews in the selected disciplines are higher than 60% in the year of publication,then gradually decline and tend to be stationary. And they are stable below10% within 10 years after publication. The zero citation rates of different types of literature are significantly different. The zero citation rates vary in different disciplines and the longer the citation half-life,the higher the zero citation rates of the articles. [Conclusions] There are differences in the change trend of zero citation rates between articles and reviews in different disciplines.
[Purposes]This paper aims to analyze the zero citation rates of articles and reviews in different disciplines. [Methods]We selected four disciplines with significant differences in the cited half-life,obtained the 10-year citation frequency of the articles and reviews in various disciplines published in 2008 from the Web of Science,and studied the changes of their zero citation rates.[Findings]The zero citation rates of articles and reviews in the selected disciplines are higher than 60% in the year of publication,then gradually decline and tend to be stationary. And they are stable below10% within 10 years after publication. The zero citation rates of different types of literature are significantly different. The zero citation rates vary in different disciplines and the longer the citation half-life,the higher the zero citation rates of the articles. [Conclusions] There are differences in the change trend of zero citation rates between articles and reviews in different disciplines.
引文
[1] Egghe L,Bornmann L,Guns R. A proposal for a first-citationspeed-index[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2011,5(1):181-186.
[2] Price D J. Networks of scientific papers[J]. Science,1965,149(3683):510-515.
[3] Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor[J]. The Journal of American Medical Association,2006,295(1):90.
[4] Garfield E. Uncitedness III:The importance of not being cited[J]. Current Contents,1973(8):5-6.
[5]朱梦皎,武夷山.零被引现象:文献综述[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(8):111-116.
[6]胡泽文,武夷山.零被引研究文献综述[J].情报学报,2015,34(2):213-224.
[7]高继平,潘云涛,武夷山.零被引论文的形成因素分析——以光谱学领域零被引论文的国家、机构和主题分布为例[J].科技导报,2015,33(8):112-119.
[8]刘武英,张薇,刘影梅.学术期刊中的零被引论文特征分析——以编辑出版类核心期刊为例[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(9):987-991.
[9]温芳芳.我国情报学论文零被引的成因及影响因素探析——基于零被引与高被引论文的比较[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(4):27-31.
[10]周芳,王艳.医学期刊中的零被引论文特征分析——以《新疆医科大学学报》为例[J].科技传播,2017(22):55-58.
[11] Koenig ME D. Bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,1983,34(2):136-145.
[12] Hargens L L,Bott D M. Science,citation,and funding[J].Science,1991,251(5000):1408-1411.
[13] Kuch T D C. Predicting the citedness of scientific papers:Object correlates of tiredness in the american journal of physiology[D].Washington:American University,1997.
[14] Lawani S M. Quality, collaboration and citations in cancer research:A bibliometric study[D]. Tallahassee:The Florida State University,1980.
[15] Peritz B C. A note on"scholarliness"and"impact"[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science&Technology,2010,34(5):360-362.
[16] Dalen H P V,Henkens K. Demographers and their journals:Who remains uncited after ten years?[J]. Population&Development Review,2004,30(3):489-506.
[17]刘涛.基于SCI-E国内15所大学1997—2006年科研能力发展态势分析[J].现代情报,2008,28(4):25-29.
[18]董建军.中国知网收录的国家自然科学基金论文的被引情况分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2012,23(5):776-778.
[19] Larivière V,Gingras Y,Archambault. The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900—2007[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2009,60(4):858-862.
[20] Yang S,Ma F,Song Y,et al. A longitudinal analysis of citation distribution breadth for Chinese scholars[J]. Scientometrics,2010,85(3):755-765.
[21]胡泽文,武夷山,高继平.图书情报学领域期刊论文零被引率的演变规律研究[J].情报学报,2018,37(3):243-253.
[22] Hu Z W,Wu Y S. Regularity in the time-dependent distribution of the percentage of never-cited papers:An empirical pilot study based on the six journals[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2014,8(1):136-146.
[23]潘云涛,梁立明,高继平,等.论文零被引面面观[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2018.
[24]中国科学技术信息研究所. 2017年中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版):自然科学卷[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2017.
[25] Sundaram M,Hodler J,Rosenthal D I. On the relevance of the Impact Factor and other factors[J]. Skeletal Radiology,2012,41(2):125.
[26]罗式胜.期刊被引半衰期的概念及其应用[J].情报科学,1994(1):23-25.
[27]刘雪立,方红玲,周志新,等.科技期刊反向评价指标——零被引论文率及其与其他文献计量学指标的关系[J].中国科技期刊研究,2011,22(4):525-528.
[2] Price D J. Networks of scientific papers[J]. Science,1965,149(3683):510-515.
[3] Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor[J]. The Journal of American Medical Association,2006,295(1):90.
[4] Garfield E. Uncitedness III:The importance of not being cited[J]. Current Contents,1973(8):5-6.
[5]朱梦皎,武夷山.零被引现象:文献综述[J].情报理论与实践,2013,36(8):111-116.
[6]胡泽文,武夷山.零被引研究文献综述[J].情报学报,2015,34(2):213-224.
[7]高继平,潘云涛,武夷山.零被引论文的形成因素分析——以光谱学领域零被引论文的国家、机构和主题分布为例[J].科技导报,2015,33(8):112-119.
[8]刘武英,张薇,刘影梅.学术期刊中的零被引论文特征分析——以编辑出版类核心期刊为例[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(9):987-991.
[9]温芳芳.我国情报学论文零被引的成因及影响因素探析——基于零被引与高被引论文的比较[J].情报理论与实践,2016,39(4):27-31.
[10]周芳,王艳.医学期刊中的零被引论文特征分析——以《新疆医科大学学报》为例[J].科技传播,2017(22):55-58.
[11] Koenig ME D. Bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,1983,34(2):136-145.
[12] Hargens L L,Bott D M. Science,citation,and funding[J].Science,1991,251(5000):1408-1411.
[13] Kuch T D C. Predicting the citedness of scientific papers:Object correlates of tiredness in the american journal of physiology[D].Washington:American University,1997.
[14] Lawani S M. Quality, collaboration and citations in cancer research:A bibliometric study[D]. Tallahassee:The Florida State University,1980.
[15] Peritz B C. A note on"scholarliness"and"impact"[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science&Technology,2010,34(5):360-362.
[16] Dalen H P V,Henkens K. Demographers and their journals:Who remains uncited after ten years?[J]. Population&Development Review,2004,30(3):489-506.
[17]刘涛.基于SCI-E国内15所大学1997—2006年科研能力发展态势分析[J].现代情报,2008,28(4):25-29.
[18]董建军.中国知网收录的国家自然科学基金论文的被引情况分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2012,23(5):776-778.
[19] Larivière V,Gingras Y,Archambault. The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900—2007[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science&Technology,2009,60(4):858-862.
[20] Yang S,Ma F,Song Y,et al. A longitudinal analysis of citation distribution breadth for Chinese scholars[J]. Scientometrics,2010,85(3):755-765.
[21]胡泽文,武夷山,高继平.图书情报学领域期刊论文零被引率的演变规律研究[J].情报学报,2018,37(3):243-253.
[22] Hu Z W,Wu Y S. Regularity in the time-dependent distribution of the percentage of never-cited papers:An empirical pilot study based on the six journals[J]. Journal of Informetrics,2014,8(1):136-146.
[23]潘云涛,梁立明,高继平,等.论文零被引面面观[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2018.
[24]中国科学技术信息研究所. 2017年中国科技期刊引证报告(核心版):自然科学卷[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,2017.
[25] Sundaram M,Hodler J,Rosenthal D I. On the relevance of the Impact Factor and other factors[J]. Skeletal Radiology,2012,41(2):125.
[26]罗式胜.期刊被引半衰期的概念及其应用[J].情报科学,1994(1):23-25.
[27]刘雪立,方红玲,周志新,等.科技期刊反向评价指标——零被引论文率及其与其他文献计量学指标的关系[J].中国科技期刊研究,2011,22(4):525-528.