激励式护理联合共情理论在抑郁症患者护理中的应用
|
摘要
目的探究激励式护理联合共情理论在抑郁症患者护理中的应用。方法选取本院94例抑郁症患者为受试对象,按入院顺序随机分为观察组(激励式护理联合共情组)和对照组(常规护理组),各47例。比较两组患者干预前后汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分、生活质量(SF-36量表)评分变化。结果两组患者HAMD评分均低于治疗前(P<0.05),且治疗后观察组分较对照组更低(P<0.05);两组患者SF-36量表生理、心理、社会关系、物质功能四个维度评分均较治疗前提高(P<0.05),且观察组患者各项评分变化幅度均更显著(P<0.05)。结论激励式护理联合共情可有效改善患者抑郁情绪,提高其生活质量。
Objective To explore the application of incentive nursing combined with empathy in the nursing of patients with depression. Methods A total of 94 patients with depression in the hospital were selected for the study and were randomly divided into observation group(incentive nursing combined with empathy group) and control group(conventional nursing group) according to the admission sequence, with 47 cases in each group. The Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD) score and quality of life(SF-36 scale) score before and after intervention were compared between the two groups. Results The HAMD scores in the two groups were lower than those before treatment(P<0.05), and the score in observation group was lower than that in control group after treatment(P<0.05). The scores of four dimensions of physiology, psychology, social relationship and material function of SF-36 scale in the two groups were higher than those before treatment(P<0.05), and the changes of the scores were more significant in observation group(P<0.05). Conclusion Incentive care combined with empathy can effectively improve patients' depression and improve the quality of life.
Objective To explore the application of incentive nursing combined with empathy in the nursing of patients with depression. Methods A total of 94 patients with depression in the hospital were selected for the study and were randomly divided into observation group(incentive nursing combined with empathy group) and control group(conventional nursing group) according to the admission sequence, with 47 cases in each group. The Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD) score and quality of life(SF-36 scale) score before and after intervention were compared between the two groups. Results The HAMD scores in the two groups were lower than those before treatment(P<0.05), and the score in observation group was lower than that in control group after treatment(P<0.05). The scores of four dimensions of physiology, psychology, social relationship and material function of SF-36 scale in the two groups were higher than those before treatment(P<0.05), and the changes of the scores were more significant in observation group(P<0.05). Conclusion Incentive care combined with empathy can effectively improve patients' depression and improve the quality of life.
引文
[1]贺楚梅,阳前军,倪敏,等.细节护理对抑郁症患者社会功能及自我效能的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(6):44-46.
[2]孙玲.小组心理护理对抑郁症患者个人和社会功能的影响观察[J].中国医药指南,2016,14(36):233.
[3]温爱萍,王彩宁,张秀芬,等.抑郁症的诊断和治疗[J].山西医药杂志,2016,45(12):1419-1421.
[4]郭冰心,王义强,朱春燕.抑郁症患者对情绪面孔的定向遗忘效应[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2015,29(8):576-580.
[5]贾静,强晓玲.综合护理干预对抑郁症患者抑郁情绪和生活质量的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2015,19(16):14-16.
[6]李强,陈敏,杨泰,等.抑郁症发病机制的研究进展[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2016,16(5):524-527.
[7]秦碧勇,戴立磊,汪键,等.抑郁症患者自杀风险与共病数量、抑郁程度的相关性研究[J].重庆医学,2016,45(13):1810-1812.
[8]付佳林,李鸣.认知行为治疗对抑郁症患者外显、内隐自杀态度的影响[J].神经损伤与功能重建,2016,11(6):526-528.
[9]任雁娟,林小敏.正念认知疗法在抑郁症患者日常护理中的应用[J].中国医药导报,2016,13(34):174-177.
[10]贺国文,赵咏梅,周洁.共情护理对抑郁症患者的抑郁情绪及生活功能的改善作用[J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(5):659-661.
[11]宋乃云,孙玉梅,王彦芳.共情护理对抑郁症病人抑郁情绪及生活功能的影响[J].护理研究,2016,30(22):2771-2772.
[2]孙玲.小组心理护理对抑郁症患者个人和社会功能的影响观察[J].中国医药指南,2016,14(36):233.
[3]温爱萍,王彩宁,张秀芬,等.抑郁症的诊断和治疗[J].山西医药杂志,2016,45(12):1419-1421.
[4]郭冰心,王义强,朱春燕.抑郁症患者对情绪面孔的定向遗忘效应[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2015,29(8):576-580.
[5]贾静,强晓玲.综合护理干预对抑郁症患者抑郁情绪和生活质量的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2015,19(16):14-16.
[6]李强,陈敏,杨泰,等.抑郁症发病机制的研究进展[J].神经疾病与精神卫生,2016,16(5):524-527.
[7]秦碧勇,戴立磊,汪键,等.抑郁症患者自杀风险与共病数量、抑郁程度的相关性研究[J].重庆医学,2016,45(13):1810-1812.
[8]付佳林,李鸣.认知行为治疗对抑郁症患者外显、内隐自杀态度的影响[J].神经损伤与功能重建,2016,11(6):526-528.
[9]任雁娟,林小敏.正念认知疗法在抑郁症患者日常护理中的应用[J].中国医药导报,2016,13(34):174-177.
[10]贺国文,赵咏梅,周洁.共情护理对抑郁症患者的抑郁情绪及生活功能的改善作用[J].检验医学与临床,2016,13(5):659-661.
[11]宋乃云,孙玉梅,王彦芳.共情护理对抑郁症病人抑郁情绪及生活功能的影响[J].护理研究,2016,30(22):2771-2772.