乡村振兴中新乡贤的培育及其整合效应——以浙江省绍兴地区为例
|
摘要
市场逻辑严重动摇了内生于乡村组织的身份系统及其整合机制。新乡贤的培育建基于乡土社会的内在需要,但又具有相当程度的建构性,是政府自觉、文化自觉与个体自觉共同推动的产物。新乡贤正在成为撬动乡村振兴的重要主体力量,在实践价值和秩序生产层面推动了乡土社会人力、物力、财力、智力和文化的创造性整合。区别于传统乡贤,从主体结构来看,新乡贤扬弃了血缘,扩展了地缘和业缘,类型更加多样化。从权威来源来看,新乡贤立足内源性生产,追加了外源性授予,贤能是关键。从功能生产来看,新乡贤扬弃了控制,拓展了服务,发展性功能更加突出。
The logic of the market increasingly challenges the identity system and its integration mechanism which is inherent in rural organizations.The new rural elite production based on the internal needs of rural society,meanwhile,it also has a certain degree of constructiveness.As the outcome of the joint promotion of the government's consciousness,cultural consciousness and individual consciousness,the group of new rural elite is becoming an important force for rural revitalization.It promotes the integration of manpower,material,financial,intellectual,and cultural resources of the local society in the two dimensions of the production of practical value and order.Different from traditional county sages,modern county sages,from the perspective of the main structure,abandon the consanguineous relationship in their work,but extend the geopolitical and karmic relationships.From the perspective of authoritative source,standing on inherence,modern county sages was also support by governmental grant which depend on personal virtue and ability. From the perspective of productive function,modern county sages give up controlling but develop the range and quality of service.They stress more on their development function.
The logic of the market increasingly challenges the identity system and its integration mechanism which is inherent in rural organizations.The new rural elite production based on the internal needs of rural society,meanwhile,it also has a certain degree of constructiveness.As the outcome of the joint promotion of the government's consciousness,cultural consciousness and individual consciousness,the group of new rural elite is becoming an important force for rural revitalization.It promotes the integration of manpower,material,financial,intellectual,and cultural resources of the local society in the two dimensions of the production of practical value and order.Different from traditional county sages,modern county sages,from the perspective of the main structure,abandon the consanguineous relationship in their work,but extend the geopolitical and karmic relationships.From the perspective of authoritative source,standing on inherence,modern county sages was also support by governmental grant which depend on personal virtue and ability. From the perspective of productive function,modern county sages give up controlling but develop the range and quality of service.They stress more on their development function.
引文
[1]杜赞奇.文化、权力与国家———1900—1942的华北农村[M].王福明,译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2004.
[2]谢俊贵.中国绅士研究述评[J].史学月刊,2002(7):13-21.
[3]费孝通.中国绅士[M].惠海鸣,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006.
[4]石珍.“新乡贤”对乡村发展的价值[J].党政论坛,2017(4):54-56.
[5]鲁可荣,胡凤娇.乡村教育复兴与文化传承路径探析———以浙江四村为例[J].广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(6):117-123.
[6]黄海.用新乡贤文化推动乡村治理现代化[N].人民日报,2015-09-30.
[7]徐勇.两种依赖关系视角下中国的“以文治理”———“以文化人”的乡村治理的阶段性特征[J].学习与探索,2017(11):59-63.
[8]李志强.改革开放以来农村社会组织功能演化特征、路径及趋势[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2018(4):120-125+160.
[9]孔繁斌.公共性的再生产:多中心治理的合作机制建构[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2012.
[10]张俊.NGO视角下的乡贤理事会初探[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2017(3):90-95.
[2]谢俊贵.中国绅士研究述评[J].史学月刊,2002(7):13-21.
[3]费孝通.中国绅士[M].惠海鸣,译.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006.
[4]石珍.“新乡贤”对乡村发展的价值[J].党政论坛,2017(4):54-56.
[5]鲁可荣,胡凤娇.乡村教育复兴与文化传承路径探析———以浙江四村为例[J].广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(6):117-123.
[6]黄海.用新乡贤文化推动乡村治理现代化[N].人民日报,2015-09-30.
[7]徐勇.两种依赖关系视角下中国的“以文治理”———“以文化人”的乡村治理的阶段性特征[J].学习与探索,2017(11):59-63.
[8]李志强.改革开放以来农村社会组织功能演化特征、路径及趋势[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2018(4):120-125+160.
[9]孔繁斌.公共性的再生产:多中心治理的合作机制建构[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2012.
[10]张俊.NGO视角下的乡贤理事会初探[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2017(3):90-95.