阿多诺美学中的“美”与“艺术”——以《启蒙辩证法》与《美学理论》之间关系的辩证解读为视角
|
摘要
本文通过分析《启蒙辩证法》与《美学理论》之间的观念勾连与审美联系,探求阿多诺美学的观念逻辑及其现实意义。阿多诺美学需要解决的问题是在审美异化的时代差异中重新确定艺术的审美立场,体现出基于"审美"与"艺术"之间辩证理解的重构艺术观:一方面,艺术是对感性的审美体验以及审美形式的否定;另一方面,艺术也是在非同一性基础上的审美体验同一化的结果。艺术是经由审美而完成的一次新的同一性的创造过程。阿多诺美学的现实意义在于其艺术观既体现出审美通过艺术重新自我建构的自律性需要,也同时意味着审美通过艺术来担负保卫和建设社会的非艺术化使命。
By analyzing the concept and aesthetic connection between The Enlightenment Dialectics and The Aesthetic Theory, this paper aims to explore the concept logic and practical significance of Adorno's aesthetics. As a matter of fact, the problem that Adorno's aesthetics needs to solve is to redefine the aesthetic standpoint of art in the age difference of aesthetic alienation which reflects the dialectical relationship between "aesthetic" and "art". On the one hand, art is the aesthetic experience of sensibility and the negation of aesthetic form; on the other hand, art is also the result of aesthetic experience on the basis of non-identity. Art is the creation of a new identity through aesthetics. Adorno's artistic conception of reconstruction reflects on the non-artistic mission of protecting and building society.
By analyzing the concept and aesthetic connection between The Enlightenment Dialectics and The Aesthetic Theory, this paper aims to explore the concept logic and practical significance of Adorno's aesthetics. As a matter of fact, the problem that Adorno's aesthetics needs to solve is to redefine the aesthetic standpoint of art in the age difference of aesthetic alienation which reflects the dialectical relationship between "aesthetic" and "art". On the one hand, art is the aesthetic experience of sensibility and the negation of aesthetic form; on the other hand, art is also the result of aesthetic experience on the basis of non-identity. Art is the creation of a new identity through aesthetics. Adorno's artistic conception of reconstruction reflects on the non-artistic mission of protecting and building society.
引文
[1]中国科学院文学研究所外国古典文艺理论丛书编辑委员会编:《柏拉图文艺对话录》,朱光潜译,北京:人民文学出版社,1963年。
[2]汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔:《真理与方法:哲学诠释学的基本特征》上卷,洪汉鼎译,上海:上海译文出版社,2004年。
[3]阿多诺:《美学理论》,王柯平译,成都:四川人民出版社,1998年。
[4]马克斯·霍克海默、西奥多·阿多诺:《启蒙辩证法:哲学片断》,渠敬东、曹卫东译,上海:上海人民出版社,2003年。
[5]特里·伊格尔顿:《审美意识形态》,王杰等译,桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2001年。
[6]Theodor W.Adorno,“Commitment”,in Notes to Literature,Volume Two,trans.Shierry Weber Nicholsen,New York:Columbia University Press,1992.
[7]西奥多·阿多诺:《否定的辩证法》,张峰译,重庆:重庆出版社,1993年。
(1)引文为作者中译。
[2]汉斯-格奥尔格·伽达默尔:《真理与方法:哲学诠释学的基本特征》上卷,洪汉鼎译,上海:上海译文出版社,2004年。
[3]阿多诺:《美学理论》,王柯平译,成都:四川人民出版社,1998年。
[4]马克斯·霍克海默、西奥多·阿多诺:《启蒙辩证法:哲学片断》,渠敬东、曹卫东译,上海:上海人民出版社,2003年。
[5]特里·伊格尔顿:《审美意识形态》,王杰等译,桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2001年。
[6]Theodor W.Adorno,“Commitment”,in Notes to Literature,Volume Two,trans.Shierry Weber Nicholsen,New York:Columbia University Press,1992.
[7]西奥多·阿多诺:《否定的辩证法》,张峰译,重庆:重庆出版社,1993年。
(1)引文为作者中译。