无概念的图型化——康德论想象力与知性的协和一致
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Schematizing Without a Concept: Kant on the Harmony of Imagination and Understanding
  • 作者:李伟
  • 英文作者:Li Wei;Department of Chinese Language and Literature, East China Normal University;
  • 关键词:想象力 ; 知性 ; 协和一致 ; 无概念的图型化
  • 英文关键词:imagination;;understanding;;harmony;;schematizing without a concept
  • 中文刊名:WYLL
  • 英文刊名:Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art
  • 机构:华东师范大学中文系;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-25
  • 出版单位:文艺理论研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39;No.223
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:WYLL201902022
  • 页数:10
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:31-1152/I
  • 分类号:216-225
摘要
康德关于想象力与知性的协和一致的理论要么会导致一切皆美,要么会无法保证鉴赏判断的普遍有效性。为了克服这种两难,一种新的思路是遵循康德在《纯粹理性批判·先验辨证论附录》中"理念—图型—对理念的表达"的思路,对文本进行一种非认识的观念论解释。从分析鉴赏判断中无概念的图型化着手,主张这种无概念的图型化是无确定概念的图型化,从而对想象力与知性的协和一致进行一种非认识的观念论解释,由此来解决一切皆美的问题。并且根据《判断力批判》§57节内容,从非认识的观念论解释进路出发,重构鉴赏判断的普遍有效性。
        Kant's theory of the harmony of imagination and understanding either leads to an inconsequent claim that "everything is beautiful" or fails to ensure the universal validity of judgements of taste. This paper proposes to approach the dilemma by way of Kant's notion of "idea—schema—the-expression-of-the-idea" developed in "Appendix to the Transcendental Dialectic," interpreting the text from a noncognitive-idealist approach. This approach starts with Kant's "schematizing without a concept," claiming that this "schematizing without a concept" is an indeterminate schematization, and thus initiates a noncognitive-idealist interpretation of the harmony of imagination and understanding. This approach, on the one hand, solves the problem that "everything is beautiful"; on the other hand, it enables a reconstruction of the universal validity of judgements of taste from a noncognitive-idealist perspective, as manifested in §57 of Critique of Judgment.
引文
Allison,Henry.Kant's Theory of Taste:A Reading of the Critique of Aesthetic Judgment.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001.
    Guyer,Paul.Kant and the Claims of Taste.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1997.
    Hughes,Fiona.Kant's Critique of Judgment.London:Continuum,2010.
    康德:《判断力批判》,邓晓芒译,杨祖陶校。北京:人民出版社,2002年。[Kant,Immanuel.Critique of Judgment.Trans.Deng Xiaomang.Ed.Yang Zutao.Beijing:People's Publish-ing House,2002.]
    ——:《纯粹理性批判》,邓晓芒译,杨祖陶校。北京:人民出版社,2004年。[——.Critique of Pure Reason.Trans.Deng Xiaomang.Ed.Yang Zutao.Beijing:People's Publishing House,2004.]
    ——:“《判断力批判》第一导言”,《冥河的摆渡者》,邓晓芒译。武汉:武汉大学出版社,2007年。[——.“First Introduction to Critique of Judgment”,The Ferryman of Styx.Trans.Deng Xiaomang.Wuhan:Wuhan University Press,2007.]
    李泽厚:《批判哲学的批判:康德述评》。北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2007年。[Li,Zehou.A New Approach to Kant:A Confucian-Marxist's Viewpoint.Beijing:SDX Joint Publishing Company,2007.]
    刘旭光:“论‘审美理念’在康德美学中的作用——重构康德美学的一种可能”,《学术月刊》8(2017):141—51。[Liu,Xuguang.“On the Function of ‘Aesthetic Idea’:Revisiting Kantian Aesthetics.” Academic Monthly 8(2017):141-51.]
    叶秀山:《启蒙与自由——叶秀山论康德》。南京:江苏人民出版社,2013年。[Ye,Xiushan.Enlightenment and Freedom:Ye Xiushan on Kant.Nanjing:Jiangsu People's Publishing House,2013.]
    ① 邓晓芒先生译文漏掉了“技艺性地”。
    ② 译文有改动。
    ③ 译文有改动。
    ④ 译文有改动。