显微外科手术治疗股骨头无菌性坏死分析
|
摘要
目的分析显微外科手术治疗股骨头无菌性坏死的有效性。方法选取我院自2016年3月—2017年5月收治的股骨头无菌性坏死的患者80例作为研究对象。将全部患者随机分为两组。研究组患者采用显微外科手术的治疗方案;对照组患者采取常规手术治疗方案。对比两组患者的治疗效果、不良反应情况。结果研究组患者的治疗有效率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);研究组患者的不良反应的发生率低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论采用显微外科手术治疗的方案后,患者的治疗有效率有着显著提升,不良反应发生率有所降低。因此,患者在临床治疗中采取使用显微外科手术的治疗方法是一种安全高效的临床治疗方案。
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of microsurgery in the treatment of aseptic necrosis of the femoral head. Methods 80 patients with aseptic necrosis of femoral head admitted to our hospital from March2016 to May 2017 were selected as the study subjects. All patients were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in the study group were treated with microsurgery. The patients in the control group received routine surgical treatment. The therapeutic effect and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared. Results The treatment efficiency of the study group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower than that in the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion After the microsurgical treatment, the patient's treatment efficiency is significantly improved, and the incidence of adverse reactions is reduced. Therefore, the patient's treatment using microsurgery in clinical treatment is a safe and effective clinical treatment plan.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of microsurgery in the treatment of aseptic necrosis of the femoral head. Methods 80 patients with aseptic necrosis of femoral head admitted to our hospital from March2016 to May 2017 were selected as the study subjects. All patients were randomly divided into two groups. The patients in the study group were treated with microsurgery. The patients in the control group received routine surgical treatment. The therapeutic effect and adverse reactions of the two groups were compared. Results The treatment efficiency of the study group was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the study group was lower than that in the control group(P < 0.05). Conclusion After the microsurgical treatment, the patient's treatment efficiency is significantly improved, and the incidence of adverse reactions is reduced. Therefore, the patient's treatment using microsurgery in clinical treatment is a safe and effective clinical treatment plan.
引文
[1]米济贤.小切口全髖关节置换术治疗股骨头无菌性坏死42例疗效分析[J].中国医药指南,2017,15(32):75-76.
[2]彭勇勇.微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术治疗股骨头坏死的效果观察[J].黑龙江医学,2017,41(1):28-29.
[3]尹春日.微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术治疗股骨头坏死的效果[J].中国卫生标准管理,2018,9(9):53-54.
[4]常超杰.微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术用于治疗股骨头坏死的临床效果观察[J].医学理论与实践,2018,31(10):72-74.
[5]张淑艳.微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术治疗晚期股骨头坏死效果观察[J].河南外科学杂志,2017,23(2):142-143.
[6]舒化兴.微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术治疗晚期股骨头坏死的疗效探析[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(36):6985-6986.
[7]朱晓波,裴继强,宋肖舟.SuperPATH微创入路全髋关节置换术在治疗股骨头无菌性坏死中的应用[J].浙江医学,2018,40(17):51-54.
[8]李平利.人工髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨头无菌性坏死合并股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果[J].实用临床医学,2018,19(6):50-51,62.
[9]刘月茹.股骨头坏死治疗中应用微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术的临床效果分析[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(7):1243-1244.
[10]康明,吴家文,郭汉明,等.微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术对晚期股骨头坏死患者的治疗效果[J].中国实用医药,2017,12(33):5-6.
[11]韩杰,陈经勇,斯焱,等.SuperPATH切口微创人工全髋关节置换术临床应用价值分析[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2017,21(4):283-287.
[12]王祥金,李艳军,伊贵铭,等.后外侧小切口入路与直接前侧入路微创全髋关节置换术的对比研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(23):2194-2197.
[2]彭勇勇.微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术治疗股骨头坏死的效果观察[J].黑龙江医学,2017,41(1):28-29.
[3]尹春日.微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术治疗股骨头坏死的效果[J].中国卫生标准管理,2018,9(9):53-54.
[4]常超杰.微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术用于治疗股骨头坏死的临床效果观察[J].医学理论与实践,2018,31(10):72-74.
[5]张淑艳.微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术治疗晚期股骨头坏死效果观察[J].河南外科学杂志,2017,23(2):142-143.
[6]舒化兴.微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术治疗晚期股骨头坏死的疗效探析[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(36):6985-6986.
[7]朱晓波,裴继强,宋肖舟.SuperPATH微创入路全髋关节置换术在治疗股骨头无菌性坏死中的应用[J].浙江医学,2018,40(17):51-54.
[8]李平利.人工髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨头无菌性坏死合并股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果[J].实用临床医学,2018,19(6):50-51,62.
[9]刘月茹.股骨头坏死治疗中应用微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术的临床效果分析[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(7):1243-1244.
[10]康明,吴家文,郭汉明,等.微创小切口人工全髋关节置换术对晚期股骨头坏死患者的治疗效果[J].中国实用医药,2017,12(33):5-6.
[11]韩杰,陈经勇,斯焱,等.SuperPATH切口微创人工全髋关节置换术临床应用价值分析[J].中国现代手术学杂志,2017,21(4):283-287.
[12]王祥金,李艳军,伊贵铭,等.后外侧小切口入路与直接前侧入路微创全髋关节置换术的对比研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2017,25(23):2194-2197.