新型多孔改良剂增强黄壤通气性能研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:On Aeration Enhancement of Yellow Soil by a Novel Porous Amendment
  • 作者:孙益权 ; 王美艳 ; 黄化刚 ; 夏庚瑞 ; 史学正 ; 张忠启 ; 徐胜祥 ; 孙维侠 ; 蔡良海 ; 班国军 ; 陈垚 ; 夏中文
  • 英文作者:SUN Yiquan;WANG Meiyan;HUANG Huagang;XIA Gengrui;SHI Xuezheng;ZHANG Zhongqi;XU Shengxiang;SUN Weixia;CAI Lianghai;BAN Guojun;CHEN Yao;XIA Zhongwen;State Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences;School of Geography,Geomatics and Planning, Jiangsu Normal University;Bijie Branch Company;
  • 关键词:新型多孔改良剂 ; 黄壤 ; 土壤通气性 ; 毕节
  • 英文关键词:Novel porous amendments;;Yellow soil;;Soil aeration;;Bijie
  • 中文刊名:TURA
  • 英文刊名:Soils
  • 机构:土壤与农业可持续发展国家重点实验室(中国科学院南京土壤研究所);江苏师范大学地理测绘与城乡规划学院;贵州省烟草公司毕节市公司;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-15
  • 出版单位:土壤
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.51;No.299
  • 基金:贵州省烟草公司毕节市公司科技专项项目(毕节合2015-02;省市院合2015-06)资助
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:TURA201901017
  • 页数:6
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:32-1118/P
  • 分类号:123-128
摘要
为探索新型多孔改良剂对黄壤通气性能的影响,本文以贵州省毕节市植烟黄壤为研究对象,通过掺入不同比例的新型多孔改良剂,研究贵州黏重黄壤物理结构的变化。结果表明:随着添加新型多孔改良剂比例的增加,土壤总孔隙度及土壤通气孔隙度均随之增加。与对照相比,3个处理(新型多孔改良剂添加比例分别为7.5%、15.0%和22.5%)的总孔隙度分别增加了2.7%、3.1%和3.2%,通气孔隙度分别增加了2.7%、8.6%和10.6%;对照和3个处理加水饱和之后,分别需要130、52、34和37 h提供足够的氧气,以保证作物正常生长。总之,新型多孔改良剂能够有效增加黏重黄壤通气孔隙,达到了增强土壤通气性能的目的,为黏重土壤改良提供了新的途径与思路。
        In order to study the effects of novel porous amendments on improving aeration of clayey yellow soil, an experiment was conducted in Bijie of Guizhou by adding different proportions of amendments to soil, and then soil porosity and aeration porosity were measured. The results showed that soil porosity and aeration porosity were increased with the increase of the proportion of novel porous amendments. Compared with CK, soil total porosities under 7.5%, 15.0% and 22.5%amendment-adding treatments increased by 2.7%, 3.1% and 3.2%, respectively, and soil aeration porosities increased by 2.7%,8.6% and 10.6%, respectively. After the water saturation, 130 h, 52 h, 34 h and 37 h were required to provide oxygen enough to ensure the growth of the crops for CK and three amendment-adding treatments, respectively. It shows that the novel porous amendments can effectively increase soil porosity and improve soil aeration of clayey yellow soil, thus, is a new way to improve clayey soil.
引文
[1]金林,孙荣国,陈卓,等.贵州喀斯特区域农村面源污染研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2016,32(35):94-98
    [2]赵欢,张萌,秦松,等.贵州黄壤小白菜生长、品质、光合特性及氮素利用对新型肥料的响应[J].中国生态农业学报,2016,24(10):1320-1327
    [3]李渝,张雅蓉,张文安,等.贵州黄壤地区不同施肥处理及降雨量对玉米产量的影响[J].水资源与水工程学报,2015,26(1):230-235
    [4]李坡.喀斯特地区过度开发土地资源的环境变异[J].贵州科学,1996,14(3):27-33
    [5]雷宏军,胡世国,潘红卫,等.土壤通气性与加氧灌溉研究进展[J].土壤学报,2017,54(2):297-308
    [6]胡青青,李恋卿,潘根兴.生物质炭醋糟复配物代替草炭对辣椒幼苗生长的影响[J].土壤,2017,49(2):273-282
    [7]蔺亚莉,李跃进,陈玉海,等.碱化盐土掺砂对土壤理化性状和玉米产量影响的研究[J].中国土壤与肥料,2016(1):119-123
    [8]李云飞,张立新,廖超英,等.粘土掺砂对烤烟氮、钾含量和光合特性及产量的影响[J].西北农业学报,2013,22(2):85-89
    [9]邱学礼,高福宏,方波,等.不同土壤改良措施对植烟土壤理化性状的影响[J].西南农业学报,2011,24(6):2270-2273
    [10]罗兴录,岑忠用,谢和霞,等.生物有机肥对土壤理化、生物性状和木薯生长的影响[J].西北农业学报,2008,17(1):167-173
    [11]梁元振,赵京考,吴德亮,等.秋施有机肥对土壤生物学、理化性状及玉米产量的影响[J].水土保持研究,2017,24(3):113-118
    [12]张艺,戴齐,廖超林,等.增施或减施有机物料对长期培肥红壤性水稻土团聚体组成的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2017(1):28-32
    [13]康倍铭,徐健,吴淑芳,等.PAM与天然土壤改良材料混合对部分土壤理化性质的影响[J].水土保持研究,2014,21(3):68-72
    [14]吕春娟,毕如田,陈卫国,等.土壤结构调理剂PAM对复垦铁尾矿砂物理性状的影响[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(6):240-245
    [15]Busscher W J,Novak J M,Caesar-Tonthat T C.Organic matter and polyacrylamide amendment of Norfolk loamy sand[J].Soil&Tillage Research.2007,93(1):171-178
    [16]周虎,李文昭,张中彬,等.利用X射线CT研究多尺度土壤结构[J].土壤学报,2013,50(6):1226-1230
    [17]G??b T.Effect of soil compaction and N fertilization on soil pore characteristics and physical quality of sandy loam soil under red clover/grass sward[J].Soil&Tillage Research,2014,144(144):8-19
    [18]Fan X,Pedroli B,Liu G,et al.Soil salinity development in the yellow river delta in relation to groundwater dynamics[J].Land Degradation&Development,2012,23(2):175-189
    [19]李志明,周清,王辉,等.土壤容重对红壤水分溶质运移特征影响的试验研究[J].水土保持学报,2009,23(5):101-103
    [20]张凯.辽西褐土耕层结构障碍因素分析及其耕作培肥措施研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2016.
    [21]郑存德.玉米高产田棕壤物理特征[J].西北农业学报,2014(1):93-97
    [22]Lipiec J,Hatano R.Quantification of compaction effects on soil physical properties and crop growth[J].Geoderma,2003,116(1):107-136
    [23]郝葳,田孝华.优质烟区土壤物理性状分析与研究[J].烟草科技,1996(5):34-35
    [24]刘目兴,吴丹,吴四平,等.三峡库区森林土壤大孔隙特征及对饱和导水率的影响[J].生态学报,2016,36(11):3189-3196
    [25]陈晓冰,程金花,陈引珍,等.基于林分空间结构分析方法的土壤大孔隙空间结构研究[J].农业机械学报,2015,46(11):174-186
    [26]邓超,毕利东,秦江涛,等.长期施肥下土壤性质变化及其对微生物生物量的影响[J].土壤,2013,45(5):888-893
    [27]丁伟.贵州省烤烟化学成分与土壤和气象因子的关系分析[D].郑州:河南农业大学,2006
    [28]张振平.中国优质烤烟生态地质背景区划研究[D].陕西杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2004
    [29]刘铭.淹水对烟草理化特性的影响[J].安徽农业科学.2010,38(24):13008-13009