五大发展理念视角下的河南省高质量发展评价研究——基于熵权TOPSISI分析法
|
摘要
将"创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享"五大发展理念作为高质量发展程度的评判准则,并构建相应指标体系,运用熵权法和TOPSIS分析法,对河南省2013年和2017年各地级市高质量发展程度进行时间和空间的对比研究.结果表明,河南省各城市的高质量发展程度存在一定差异,总体上形成以郑州为绝对重心的"核心-边缘"结构,郑州的领先优势极其明显;传统的工业强市在高质量发展综合水平上较高,豫西和豫南城市虽然在高质量发展综合水平上较低,但分项子系统都多少存在一定优势;各地市应当依据自身特点,加强与郑州这一核心都市的融合联系,以优势子系统为引领,探索适合本地的差异化高质量发展路径.
The five development concepts are innovation,coordination,green,openness and sharing. Taking them as the criteria for evaluating the development of high quality and constructing the corresponding evaluation system,this paper makes a comparative study on the time and space of the high-quality development degree of Henan provincial cities in 2013 and 2017 by using the method of entropy weight and TOPSIS analysis.The result shows that there are some differences in the degree of high-quality development among the cities in Henan Province. On the whole,a core-periphery structure with Zhengzhou as the absolute center of gravity is formed. And the leading advantage of Zhengzhou City is extremely obvious. Cities with a strong degree of industrialization have a higher comprehensive level of high-quality development. Although the cities in western and southern Henan have a lower comprehensive level of high-quality development,they have some advantages in the sub-subsystems. According to their own characteristics,each city should strengthen its integration with Zhengzhou and explore their own differentiated highquality development path with the leading by their superiority sub-system.
The five development concepts are innovation,coordination,green,openness and sharing. Taking them as the criteria for evaluating the development of high quality and constructing the corresponding evaluation system,this paper makes a comparative study on the time and space of the high-quality development degree of Henan provincial cities in 2013 and 2017 by using the method of entropy weight and TOPSIS analysis.The result shows that there are some differences in the degree of high-quality development among the cities in Henan Province. On the whole,a core-periphery structure with Zhengzhou as the absolute center of gravity is formed. And the leading advantage of Zhengzhou City is extremely obvious. Cities with a strong degree of industrialization have a higher comprehensive level of high-quality development. Although the cities in western and southern Henan have a lower comprehensive level of high-quality development,they have some advantages in the sub-subsystems. According to their own characteristics,each city should strengthen its integration with Zhengzhou and explore their own differentiated highquality development path with the leading by their superiority sub-system.
引文
[1]魏敏,李书昊.新常态下中国经济增长质量的评价体系构建与测度[J].经济学家,2018(4):19-26.
[2]谷建全.河南实现高质量发展需要加快五个转换[J].农村·农业·农民(A版),2018,483(5):13.
[3]张永恒,郝寿义.高质量发展阶段新旧动力转换的产业优化升级路径[J].改革,2018,297(11):30-39.
[4]金碚.关于“高质量发展”的经济学研究[J].中国工业经济,2018(4):5-18.
[5]任保平.新时代高质量发展的政治经济学理论逻辑及其现实性[J].人文杂志,2018(2):26-34.
[6]薛贺香.河南省经济增长质量的实证分析[J].北方经贸,2009(9):43-44.
[7]李胭胭,鲁丰先.河南省经济增长质量的时空格局[J].经济地理,2016,36(3):41-47.
[8]田光辉,赵宏波,苗长虹.基于五大发展理念视角的河南省区域发展状态评价[J].经济经纬,2018(1):22-28.
[9]张安忠.河南要素投入结构变动与经济发展质量提高的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2012,32(24):84-89.
[10]李冻菊.区域创新能力与经济增长质量的关系——以河南省为例[J].社会科学家,2013(7):67-72.
[11]陈昌兵.新时代我国经济高质量发展动力转换研究[J].上海经济研究,2018(5):16-24.
[12]黄群慧.改革开放40年经济高速增长的成就与转向高质量发展的战略举措[J].经济论坛,2018,576(7):14-17.
[13]任保平.新时代中国经济从高速增长转向高质量发展:理论阐释与实践取向[J].学术月刊,2018(3):66-74.
[14]程恩富.论新常态下的五大发展理念[J].南京财经大学学报,2016(1):1-7.
[15]辜胜阻,吴华君,吴沁沁.创新驱动与核心技术突破是高质量发展的基石[J].中国软科学,2018,334(10):14-23.
[16]郝大江,张荣.要素禀赋、集聚效应与经济增长动力转换[J].经济学家,2018(1):41-49.
[17]夏勇.脱钩与追赶:中国城市绿色发展路径研究[J].财经研究,2017(9):123-134.
[18]苏立君.逆全球化与美国“再工业化”的不可能性研究[J].经济学家,2017,6(6):96-104.
[19]魏敏,李书昊.新常态下中国经济增长质量的评价体系构建与测度[J].经济学家,2018(4):19-26.
[2]谷建全.河南实现高质量发展需要加快五个转换[J].农村·农业·农民(A版),2018,483(5):13.
[3]张永恒,郝寿义.高质量发展阶段新旧动力转换的产业优化升级路径[J].改革,2018,297(11):30-39.
[4]金碚.关于“高质量发展”的经济学研究[J].中国工业经济,2018(4):5-18.
[5]任保平.新时代高质量发展的政治经济学理论逻辑及其现实性[J].人文杂志,2018(2):26-34.
[6]薛贺香.河南省经济增长质量的实证分析[J].北方经贸,2009(9):43-44.
[7]李胭胭,鲁丰先.河南省经济增长质量的时空格局[J].经济地理,2016,36(3):41-47.
[8]田光辉,赵宏波,苗长虹.基于五大发展理念视角的河南省区域发展状态评价[J].经济经纬,2018(1):22-28.
[9]张安忠.河南要素投入结构变动与经济发展质量提高的实证研究[J].科技管理研究,2012,32(24):84-89.
[10]李冻菊.区域创新能力与经济增长质量的关系——以河南省为例[J].社会科学家,2013(7):67-72.
[11]陈昌兵.新时代我国经济高质量发展动力转换研究[J].上海经济研究,2018(5):16-24.
[12]黄群慧.改革开放40年经济高速增长的成就与转向高质量发展的战略举措[J].经济论坛,2018,576(7):14-17.
[13]任保平.新时代中国经济从高速增长转向高质量发展:理论阐释与实践取向[J].学术月刊,2018(3):66-74.
[14]程恩富.论新常态下的五大发展理念[J].南京财经大学学报,2016(1):1-7.
[15]辜胜阻,吴华君,吴沁沁.创新驱动与核心技术突破是高质量发展的基石[J].中国软科学,2018,334(10):14-23.
[16]郝大江,张荣.要素禀赋、集聚效应与经济增长动力转换[J].经济学家,2018(1):41-49.
[17]夏勇.脱钩与追赶:中国城市绿色发展路径研究[J].财经研究,2017(9):123-134.
[18]苏立君.逆全球化与美国“再工业化”的不可能性研究[J].经济学家,2017,6(6):96-104.
[19]魏敏,李书昊.新常态下中国经济增长质量的评价体系构建与测度[J].经济学家,2018(4):19-26.