单位对科技成果法定范围、权属主体的限制解释
|
摘要
高等院校、科研院所容易扩张科技成果认定权,对单位科技成果的范围、权属主体作出扩张解释。单位的扩张解释态度,有其政策与法律依据,但是,过度扩张解释容易导致科技成果虚报和科技成果造假,从而挫伤研发者的科研积极性和创造性。实务操作中,科研单位科技管理部门对科技成果的认定,既应当受到不允许类推解释的限制,又应当受到同行专家审查的限制。在职务科技成果认定中,应当对《促进科技成果转化法》第2条所规定的任务标准、资源标准进行限制解释,合理限缩职务科技成果认定范围。
Colleges and universities,scientific research institutes to expand scientific and technological achievements that right,the scope of the unit of scientific and technological achievements,the ownership do expansion explanation.Unit's expansion explanation has its policy and legal basis,but easily lead to excessive expansion of interpretation of scientific and technological achievements of scientific and technological achievements of false fraud,thus undermining developers enthusiasm for scientific research.In practice,science and technology management department identified scientific research units of scientific and technological achievements,should have not allowed the analogy to explain the restrictions should be subject to peer review restrictions.In the identification of the scientific and technological achievements of the post,the scientific and technological achievements should be constracted and the scope of the identification of the achievements of the post should be limited.
Colleges and universities,scientific research institutes to expand scientific and technological achievements that right,the scope of the unit of scientific and technological achievements,the ownership do expansion explanation.Unit's expansion explanation has its policy and legal basis,but easily lead to excessive expansion of interpretation of scientific and technological achievements of scientific and technological achievements of false fraud,thus undermining developers enthusiasm for scientific research.In practice,science and technology management department identified scientific research units of scientific and technological achievements,should have not allowed the analogy to explain the restrictions should be subject to peer review restrictions.In the identification of the scientific and technological achievements of the post,the scientific and technological achievements should be constracted and the scope of the identification of the achievements of the post should be limited.
引文
[1]万钢.关于《中华人民共和国促进科技成果转化法(草案)》的说明[M].中华人民共和国促进科技成果转化法.北京:中国法制出版社,2015:24-25.
[2]阙维明,张锦智.现代科技管理辞典[M].广州:广东高等教育出版社,1986:103.
[3]李玉香.科技成果转化法律问题研究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2015:3.
[4]计晓华,陈涛.高校科技成果转化的系统分析[M].沈阳:沈阳出版社,2014:42.
[5]中国科学院.中国科学院科学技术研究成果管理办法[J].中国科学院院刊,1986(3):283.
[6]牛忠志.科技法通论[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,2007:215.
[7]陈金钊.法律解释规则及其运用研究(中)---法律解释规则及其分类[J].政法论丛,2013(4):76.
[8]许世海.科学技术研究与统计指标体系内容初探[M].沈阳统计论文选编(第3辑).沈阳:沈阳市统计学会编,1987:140.
[9]张铭慎.谨防加速科技成果转化陷入新误区[J].中国发展观察,2017(14):41.
[10]陈金钊等.法律解释学---立场、原则与方法[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2009:422.
[11]杨晓娜.法律类推适用新探[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2013:201-202.
[12]刘浩.刑法解释方法论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2014:203.
[13]中国科学院制.中国科学院科学技术研究成果管理办法[J].中国科学院院刊,1986(3):283.
[14]尹锋林.新《促进科技成果转化法》与知识产权运用相关问题研究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2015:13.
[15]解栋栋,曾翔.关于上海高校和科研院所职务科技成果产权管理体制改革[J].科学发展,2015(12):65.
[16]葛洪义.法理学(第2版)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2012:339.
[2]阙维明,张锦智.现代科技管理辞典[M].广州:广东高等教育出版社,1986:103.
[3]李玉香.科技成果转化法律问题研究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2015:3.
[4]计晓华,陈涛.高校科技成果转化的系统分析[M].沈阳:沈阳出版社,2014:42.
[5]中国科学院.中国科学院科学技术研究成果管理办法[J].中国科学院院刊,1986(3):283.
[6]牛忠志.科技法通论[M].长春:吉林大学出版社,2007:215.
[7]陈金钊.法律解释规则及其运用研究(中)---法律解释规则及其分类[J].政法论丛,2013(4):76.
[8]许世海.科学技术研究与统计指标体系内容初探[M].沈阳统计论文选编(第3辑).沈阳:沈阳市统计学会编,1987:140.
[9]张铭慎.谨防加速科技成果转化陷入新误区[J].中国发展观察,2017(14):41.
[10]陈金钊等.法律解释学---立场、原则与方法[M].长沙:湖南人民出版社,2009:422.
[11]杨晓娜.法律类推适用新探[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2013:201-202.
[12]刘浩.刑法解释方法论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2014:203.
[13]中国科学院制.中国科学院科学技术研究成果管理办法[J].中国科学院院刊,1986(3):283.
[14]尹锋林.新《促进科技成果转化法》与知识产权运用相关问题研究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2015:13.
[15]解栋栋,曾翔.关于上海高校和科研院所职务科技成果产权管理体制改革[J].科学发展,2015(12):65.
[16]葛洪义.法理学(第2版)[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2012:339.