大学英语课程过程性评价探析
|
摘要
一直以来,在大学英语教学中所采取的主要的评价方式是终结性评价,这种强调考试的方式给外语教学带来了负面影响。而多元化的过程性评价是可以在既保证学生高效快速地完成学习任务的同时,又实现对学生客观、公正的评价。本文将在前人研究的基础上,从动态评估视角下分析内蒙古师范大学国际交流学院的大学英语课,以探寻过程性评价对于具体某一专业的大学英语课程的适用性和有效性。
Summative evaluation has always been the main evaluation method adopted in college English teaching.The method has brought negative effects on foreign language teaching. The diversified process evaluation can not only ensure the efficiency and rapid completion of learning tasks, but also attain objective and fair evaluation of students.The article base on the previous studies, try to analyzes college English courses from the perspective of dynamic evaluation of the school of international communication of Inner Mongolia normal university, to explore the applicability and effectiveness of process evaluation for college English courses.
Summative evaluation has always been the main evaluation method adopted in college English teaching.The method has brought negative effects on foreign language teaching. The diversified process evaluation can not only ensure the efficiency and rapid completion of learning tasks, but also attain objective and fair evaluation of students.The article base on the previous studies, try to analyzes college English courses from the perspective of dynamic evaluation of the school of international communication of Inner Mongolia normal university, to explore the applicability and effectiveness of process evaluation for college English courses.
引文
[1] Poehner, M.E.&J.P.Lantolf.Dynamic Assessment in the Language Classroom Language Teaching Research[M].The Pennsylvania State University, 2005.
[2] Poehner, M.E.&J.P.Lantolf.Dynamic Assessment of L2Development.CALPER Working Paper Series(1)[J].Center for Advanced Proficiency Education,2003(5):55.
[3] Lantolf, J.P., M.E.Poehner.Dynamic Assessment of L2Development:Bringing the Past into the Future[J].Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2004(1):55-59.
[4]教育部高教司.大学英语课程要求[M].上海:上海外语教学出版社,2007.
[5]高凌飚,钟媚.过程性评价:概念、范围与实施[J].上海教育科研,2005(9):12-14,59.
[6]张曙光.过程性评价的哲学诠释[J].齐鲁学刊,2012(0):69-73.
[2] Poehner, M.E.&J.P.Lantolf.Dynamic Assessment of L2Development.CALPER Working Paper Series(1)[J].Center for Advanced Proficiency Education,2003(5):55.
[3] Lantolf, J.P., M.E.Poehner.Dynamic Assessment of L2Development:Bringing the Past into the Future[J].Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2004(1):55-59.
[4]教育部高教司.大学英语课程要求[M].上海:上海外语教学出版社,2007.
[5]高凌飚,钟媚.过程性评价:概念、范围与实施[J].上海教育科研,2005(9):12-14,59.
[6]张曙光.过程性评价的哲学诠释[J].齐鲁学刊,2012(0):69-73.