市域尺度两种生态系统服务评价方法对比研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparative study on two evaluating methods of ecosystem services at city-scale
  • 作者:刘世梁 ; 赵爽 ; 成方妍 ; 侯笑云 ; 贾克敬 ; 祁帆 ; 杨枫
  • 英文作者:LIU Shiliang;ZHAO Shuang;CHENG Fangyan;HOU Xiaoyun;JIA Kejing;QI Fan;YANG Feng;State Key Laboratory of Water Environment Simulation, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University;China Land Surveying and Planning Institute;
  • 关键词:生态系统服务 ; 模型评价法 ; NPP定量指标法 ; 生态保护红线 ; 鹤壁市
  • 英文关键词:Ecosystem service;;Model evaluation method;;NPP quantitative index method;;Ecological protection red line;;Hebi City
  • 中文刊名:ZGTN
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture
  • 机构:北京师范大学环境学院水环境模拟国家重点实验室;中国土地勘测规划院;
  • 出版日期:2018-09-06
  • 出版单位:中国生态农业学报
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.26;No.167
  • 基金:国家重点研发计划项目(2016YFC0502103);; 国家自然科学基金面上项目(41571173)资助~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZGTN201809009
  • 页数:9
  • CN:09
  • ISSN:13-1315/S
  • 分类号:63-71
摘要
生态保护红线的划定对于规范人类活动、控制人类活动强度、维护生态安全和保护生态系统功能的可持续性具有重要意义,生态系统服务评价是其中重要的一环。由于我国地域面积广阔、地形地貌特征多样、区域自然状况复杂多变,因此环境保护部于2015年出台的《生态保护红线划定技术指南》中有两种生态系统服务评价的方法,即NPP定量指标法和模型评价法。本研究基于MODIS遥感影像,利用NPP定量指标法对鹤壁市生态系统服务进行评价,并与模型评价法进行比较,为选取更为适合该区域的评价方法,及较小尺度的生态保护红线的划定提供理论依据。结果表明在市域尺度上,NPP定量指标法和模型评价法的评价结果之间存在显著差异。模型评价法对鹤壁市生态系统服务(水土保持功能和生物多样性保护功能)的高评价区域与生态保护现状较好的区域更为一致(面积重叠比例分别为19%和85%),而NPP定量指标法的评价结果与保护现状并不一致。相对于NPP定量指标法,模型评价法更适合对该研究区域的生态系统服务进行评价。因此在以后的研究中,应结合研究区域的实际情况,选取适当的方法进行生态系统服务评价。本研究的对比分析可为市域尺度的生态系统服务评价及生态保护红线的划定提供参考。
        The red line of ecological protection is significance in controlling the intensity of human activity and in maintaining ecological security and sustainability. China has already carried out a demarcation work of red line for ecological protection at national scale and is now nearing completion at provincial scale. Also the demarcation of red line for ecological protection at municipal scale is underway. However, in the process of delineating the red line for ecological protection, problems such as difficulty in classification, diversification of indicators, determination of scale and selection of evaluation methods have been encountered. The evaluation of ecosystem services is one important step in delineating red lines. Ecosystem service refers to any benefit that mankind can obtain from the ecosystem and it is the basis of human survival and modern civilization. Human neglect of ecosystem services and their importance has caused serious damage to critical natural ecosystems. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out an evaluation of ecosystem services. To standardize the evaluation of ecosystem services in China, the Technical Guidelines for the delineation of red lines for ecological protection issued by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment recommended the NPP quantitative index method and the model evaluation method to evaluate ecosystem services. As China has wide geographical extent with complex topographic features and natural conditions, it is important to evaluate the suitability of the two methods for application in demarcating red lines for ecological service evaluation. Based on MODIS remote sensing images, the evaluation of ecosystem services in Hebi City was carried out using the NPP quantitative index method and compared with the model evaluation method. The purpose of the paper was to select a more suitable evaluation method for the area and to provide theoretical basis for the demarcation of red line for ecological protection smaller-scale. In this study, we compared the results of the ecosystem service evaluation derived from the two different methods. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the NPP quantitative index method and the model evaluation method at prefectural city scale. In order to judge which method was more accurate, we compared the results of the two evaluation methods in terms of spatial distribution of the forest park. The model evaluation method was more consistent for high evaluation area of ecosystem services(soil and water conservation functions and biodiversity protection function) and the area with better ecological protection(area overlapping ratios of 19% and 85%, respectively) in Hebi City. The evaluation result of the NPP quantitative index method was not consistent with the protection status. The reason why the NPP quantitative index method was inaccurate was that the selected parameters and calculation formulas were not suitable for the study area. Therefore, the model evaluation method was more accurate for evaluating ecosystem services in the study area, compared with the NPP quantitative index method at prefectural city scale. Appropriate method should be selected according to actual local conditions in order to accurately evaluate ecosystem services in future studies. The comparative analysis in this study provided a reference point for evaluating ecosystem services and delineating red lines for ecological protection.
引文
[1]姚佳,王敏,黄宇驰,等.我国生态保护红线三维制度体系——以宁德市为例[J].生态学报,2015,35(20):6848-6856YAO J,WANG M,HUANG Y C,et al.Three-dimensional frame exploration of the ecological protection red line in China:A case study of the Ningde Region[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35(20):6848-6856
    [2]林勇,樊景凤,温泉,等.生态红线划分的理论和技术[J].生态学报,2016,36(5):1244-1252LIN Y,FAN J F,WEN Q,et al.Primary exploration of ecological theories and technologies for delineation of ecological redline zones[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2016,36(5):1244-1252
    [3]黎斌,何建华,屈赛,等.基于贝叶斯网络的城市生态红线划定方法[J].生态学报,2018,38(3):800-811LI B,HE J H,QU S,et al.A method of delimiting urban ecological red line protection area based on Bayesian network[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2018,38(3):800-811
    [4]蒋大林,曹晓峰,匡鸿海,等.生态保护红线及其划定关键问题浅析[J].资源科学,2015,37(9):1755-1764JIANG D L,CAO X F,KUANG H H,et al.Ecological red line planning and related key issues analysis for China[J].Resources Science,2015,37(9):1755-1764
    [5]傅伯杰,周国逸,白永飞,等.中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(6):571-576FU B J,ZHOU G Y,BAI Y F,et al.The main terrestrial ecosystem services and ecological security in China[J].Advances in Earth Science,2009,24(6):571-576
    [6]MAITRE D C L,MILTON S J,JARMAIN C.Linking ecosystem services and water resources:Landscape-scale hydrology of the Little Karoo[J].Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2007,5(5):261-270
    [7]郑华,李屹峰,欧阳志云,等.生态系统服务功能管理研究进展[J].生态学报,2013,33(3):702-710ZHENG H,LI Y F,OUYANG Z Y,et al.Progress and perspectives of ecosystem services management[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2013,33(3):702-710
    [8]张琨,吕一河,傅伯杰.黄土高原典型区植被恢复及其对生态系统服务的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2017,33(1):23-31ZHANG K,LYU Y H,FU B J.Vegetation restoration and its influences on ecosystem services in areas typical of the Loess Plateau[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2017,33(1):23-31
    [9]杨旭,沈珍,闵水发,等.生态系统服务研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2015,31(35):133-138YANG X,SHEN Z,MIN S F,et al.Ecosystem services:A review[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2015,31(35):133-138
    [10]PIMM S L,JENKINS C N,ABELL R,et al.The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction,distribution,and protection[J].Science,2014,344(6187):987
    [11]肖强,肖洋,欧阳志云,等.重庆市森林生态系统服务功能价值评估[J].生态学报,2014,34(1):216-223XIAO Q,XIAO Y,OUYANG Z Y,et al.Value assessment of the function of the forest ecosystem services in Chongqing[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2014,34(1):216-223
    [12]BURKHARD B,KROLL F,NEDKOV S,et al.Mapping ecosystem service supply,demand and budgets[J].Ecological Indicators,2012,21:17-29
    [13]CROSSMAN N D,BURKHARD B,NEDKOV S,et al.A blueprint for mapping and modeling ecosystem services[J].Ecosystem Services,2013,4:4-14
    [14]张宏锋,欧阳志云,郑华.生态系统服务功能的空间尺度特征[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(9):1432-1437ZHANG H F,OUYANG Z Y,ZHENG H.Spatial scale characteristics of ecosystem services[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2007,26(9):1432-1437
    [15]王宽,蔡正华,齐增湘,等.2000—2013年衡阳市土地利用格局转变对生态系统服务的影响[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(7):1060-1070WANG K,CAI Z H,QI Z X,et al.Effect of land use transformation pattern in 2000–2013 on ecosystem services in Hengyang City,China[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2017,25(7):1060–1070
    [16]李晓赛,朱永明,赵丽,等.基于价值系数动态调整的青龙县生态系统服务价值变化研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(3):373–381LI X S,ZHU Y M,ZHAO L,et al.Ecosystem services value change in Qinglong County from dynamically adjusted value coefficients[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2015,23(3):373–381
    [17]焦亮,赵成章.祁连山国家自然保护区山丹马场草地生态系统服务功能价值分析及评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(12):47-52JIAO L,ZHAO C Z.The analysis and evaluation on grassland ecosystem service function value of Shandan Horse Field in Qilian Mountain National Nature Reserve[J].Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2013,27(12):47-52
    [18]肖燚,陈圣宾,张路,等.基于生态系统服务的海南岛自然保护区体系规划[J].生态学报,2011,31(24):7357-7369XIAO Y,CHEN S B,ZHANG L,et al.Designing nature reserve systems based on ecosystem services in Hainan Island[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(24):7357-7369
    [19]冯继广,丁陆彬,王景升,等.基于案例的中国森林生态系统服务功能评价[J].应用生态学报,2016,27(5):1375-1382FENG J G,DING L B,WANG J S,et al.Case-based evaluation of forest ecosystem service function in China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2016,27(5):1375-1382
    [20]石小亮,陈珂,揭昌亮,等.吉林省森林生态系统服务价值评价[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(5):312-319SHI X L,CHEN K,JIE C L,et al.Evaluation on service value of forest ecosystem in Jilin Province[J].Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation,2016,36(5):312-319
    [21]庞丙亮,崔丽娟,马牧源,等.若尔盖高寒湿地生态系统服务价值评价[J].湿地科学,2014,12(3):273-278PANG B L,CUI L J,MA M Y,et al.Evaluation of ecosystem services valuation of Alpine Wetlands in ZoigêPlateau[J].Wetland Science,2014,12(3):273-278
    [22]江波,欧阳志云,苗鸿,等.海河流域湿地生态系统服务功能价值评价[J].生态学报,2011,31(8):2236-2244JIANG B,OUYANG Z Y,MIAO H,et al.Ecosystem services valuation of the Haihe River Basin Wetlands[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2011,31(8):2236-2244
    [23]肖玉,谢高地,安凯,等.华北平原小麦-玉米农田生态系统服务评价[J].中国生态农业学报,2011,19(2):429-435XIAO Y,XIE G D,AN K,et al.Ecosystem services of wheat-maize cropland systems in the North China Plain[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2011,19(2):429-435
    [24]杨正勇,杨怀宇,郭宗香.农业生态系统服务价值评估研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2009,17(5):1045-1050YANG Z Y,YANG H Y,GUO Z X.A literature review on evaluation of agricultural ecosystem services[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2009,17(5):1045-1050
    [25]高渐飞,熊康宁.喀斯特石漠化生态系统服务价值对生态治理的响应——以贵州花江峡谷石漠化治理示范区为例[J].中国生态农业学报,2015,23(6):775–784GAO J F,XIONG K N.Ecosystem service value responses to ecological control in Karst region—A case study of Huajiang gorge demonstration area of rocky desertification control in Guizhou[J].Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,2015,23(6):775–784
    [26]刘晓娜,张微微,李红.基于LUCC的密云水库上游流域人为干扰动态变化[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(6):951–957LIU X N,ZHANG W W,LI H.Research on dynamics of human disturbance in upper streams of Miyun Reservoir Watershed based on land use and land cover change[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2016,32(6):951–957
    [27]郭晓娜,苏维词,李强,等.三峡库区(重庆段)地表起伏度及其对生态系统服务价值的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2016,32(6):887-894GUO X N,SU W C,LI Q,et al.Surface relief degree and its effects on ecosystem service value in the Chongqing section of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region,China[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2016,32(6):887-894
    [28]张立伟,傅伯杰,吕一河,等.基于综合指标法的中国生态系统服务保护有效性评价研究[J].地理学报,2016,71(5):768-780ZHANG L W,FU B J,LYU Y H,et al.The using of composite indicators to assess the conservational effectiveness of ecosystem services in China[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2016,71(5):768-780
    [29]徐卫华,欧阳志云,黄璜,等.中国陆地优先保护生态系统分析[J].生态学报,2006,26(1):271-280XU W H,OUYANG Z Y,HUANG H,et al.Priority analysis on conserving China’s terrestrial ecosystems[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2006,26(1):271-280
    [30]赵富伟,武建勇,薛达元.《生物多样性公约》传统知识议题的背景、进展与趋势[J].生物多样性,2013,21(2):232-237ZHAO F W,WU J Y,XUE D Y.Background,progress and prospect of traditional knowledge under the convention on biological diversity[J].Biodiversity Science,2013,21(2):232-237
    [31]吕一河,张立伟,王江磊.生态系统及其服务保护评估:指标与方法[J].应用生态学报,2013,24(5):1237-1243LYU Y H,ZHANG L W,WANG J L.Assessment of ecosystem and its services conservation:Indicators and methods[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2013,24(5):1237-1243
    [32]COWLING R M,EGOH B,KNIGHT A T,et al.An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2008,105(28):9483-9488
    [33]赵小汎.土地利用生态服务价值指标体系评估结果比较研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2016,25(1):98-105ZHAO X F.Comparison on evaluation result and index system of ecosystem service values based on land use[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2016,25(1):98-105
    [34]张健,田国行.基于生态足迹法的鹤壁市可持续发展探讨[J].河南农业大学学报,2012,46(1):85-91ZHANG J,TIAN G X.Ecological footprint based analysis of sustainable development of Hebi City[J].Journal of Henan Agricultural University,2012,46(1):85-91
    [35]徐雨晴,周波涛,於琍,等.气候变化背景下中国未来森林生态系统服务价值的时空特征[J].生态学报,2018,38(6):1952-1963XU Y Q,ZHOU B T,YU L,et al.Temporal-spatial dynamic pattern of forest ecosystem service value affected by climate change in the future in China[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2018,38(6):1952-1963
    [36]王丽霞,邹长新,王燕,等.基于GIS识别生态保护红线边界的方法——以北京市昌平区为例[J].生态学报,2017,37(18):6176-6185WANG L X,ZOU C X,WANG Y,et al.Methods to identify the boundary of ecological protection red line regions using GIS:A case study in Changping,Beijing[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(18):6176-6185

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700