摘要
本文运用Malmquist指数及公共投资贫困发生率弹性两种指标测算我国公共投资的精准扶贫效率。研究结果表明,我国公共投资影响精准扶贫的效率逐渐下降。最后,运用面板数据进行实证研究,结果显示基础设施、卫生健康、社会文化等领域的公共投资能够显著减小贫困发生率,故而这三类公共投资的优先级较高。
引文
[1]金戈.中国基础设施资本存量估算[J].经济研究,2012,47(04):4-14+100.
[2]匡远配,罗荷花.水土保持与农业经济增长、减贫关系的实证研究[J].农业经济问题,2010,(1):54~58.
[3]韦鸿,张全红.中国农村公共投资的减贫效果分析[J].经济问题,2009,(09):81~85.
[4]伍琴.公共投资对集中连片特困地区的扶贫机制研究--以赣南原中央苏区为例[J].江西社会科学,2014,34(09):69~74.
[5]Goldsmith R W.A Perpetual Inventory of National Wealth[J].Nber Chapters,2009,volume 12:5~74.
[6]Martin Ravallion,GauravDatt.Why has economic growth been more pro-poor in some states of India than others?[J].Journal of Development Economics,2002,68(2):381~400.
[7]Paul Mosley,John Hudson,ArjanVerschoor.Aid,Poverty Reduction and the New Conditionality[J].The Economic Journal,2004(114):217~243.
[8]Shenggen Fan,Peter Hazell,SukhadeoThorat.Government and Ending,Growth and Poverty in Rural India[J].American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2000,(82):1038~1051.
[9]Shenggen Fan,Xiaobo Zhang.Production and Productivity Growth in Chinese Agriculture:New National and Regional Measures[J].Economic Development and Cultural Change,2002,50(4):819~838.
(1)限于篇幅,具体检验结果留存备索。