夏南牛与夏和杂一代(F_1)牛肉品质比较研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparison of the Beef Quality Traits between Xia×He F_1 (Japanese Black Beef Cattle×Xianan Cattle) and Xianan Cattle
  • 作者:柏峻 ; 梁欢 ; 赵向辉 ; 瞿明仁 ; 许兰娇 ; 潘珂 ; 祁兴磊
  • 英文作者:BAI Jun;LIANG Huan;ZHAO Xiang-hui;QU Ming-ren;XU Lan-jiao;PAN Ke;QI Xing-lei;Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science of Jiangxi Province,Jiangxi Agricultural University;Animal Husbandry Bureau of Biyang County Henan Province;
  • 关键词:夏南牛 ; 杂一代 ; 肉品质 ; 营养成分
  • 英文关键词:Xianan cattle;;F1;;meat quality traits;;nutrient components
  • 中文刊名:JXND
  • 英文刊名:Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis
  • 机构:江西农业大学江西省动物营养重点实验室/营养饲料开发工程研究中心;河南省泌阳县畜牧局;
  • 出版日期:2017-04-20
  • 出版单位:江西农业大学学报
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.39;No.202
  • 基金:国家公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201303143);; 广昌县肉牛饲料研制与营养(09005392);; 国家现代肉牛牦牛产业技术体系项目(CARS-38)~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:JXND201702021
  • 页数:5
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:36-1028/S
  • 分类号:168-172
摘要
为筛选适宜的杂交组合,提高牛肉品质,选取发育正常,健康无病,经过育肥的24个月龄夏和杂一代牛和纯种夏南牛各6头(均为阉牛)进行屠宰测定,比较夏和杂一代牛(日本黑毛和牛♂×夏南牛♀,F_1)与纯种夏南牛的牛肉品质。结果显示:(1)在营养成分含量方面,夏和杂一代牛的眼肌脂肪含量为17.72%,显著高于纯种夏南牛的脂肪含量5.49%(P<0.05),水分含量为60.84%,显著低于纯种夏南牛(P<0.05),但纯种夏南牛的眼肌蛋白质含量(23.39%)显著高于夏和杂一代牛(P<0.05)。(2)在肉质指标方面,夏和杂一代牛的眼肌剪切力显著低于纯种夏南牛(P<0.05),滴水损失和蒸煮损失显著高于纯种夏南牛(P<0.05),眼肌面积显著低于纯种夏南牛(P<0.05),2组牛的眼肌pH值差异不显著(P>0.05)。综上,夏和杂一代牛的眼肌脂肪含量和嫩度显著好于纯种的夏南牛,而眼肌面积、滴水损失及蒸煮损失不如纯种夏南牛。
        In order to compare the beef quality traits between Xia×He F_1cattle( Japanese black beef cattle × Xianan) and Xianan cattle,6 cattles of Xia×He F_1 and 6 cattles of Xianan cattle,which grew normally,healthy and disease-free were slaughtered after 24 months high-intensity fattening to measure the rib-eye beef quality traits of Xia×He F_1 and Xianan cattle.The results were as follows.( 1) In the nutritional characteristics of beef,the fat content of Xia×He F_1 beef was 17.72%,significantly higher than that of Xianan beef,which was5.49%( P<0.05),the moisture content of Xia×He F_1 beef was 60.84%,significantly lower than that of Xianan beef( P<0.05),the protein content of Xianan beef( 23.39%) was significantly higher than that of Xia×He F_1beef( P<0.05).( 2) In meat quality properties of beef,the indexes of the shear force,cooking loss,eye muscle area of Xia×He F_1 beef was significantly lower than that of Xianan beef( P<0.05).And the drip loss( 1.46%)of Xianan cattle was significantly better than that of Xia×He F_1( P<0.05); but there was no significant difference in pH between Xia×He F_1 and Xianan cattle( P>0.05).In conclusion,the beef quality of Xia×He F_1 was significantly better than that of Xianan cattle,therefore,the crossbreeding of Japanese black beef cattle and Xianan cattle can significantly improve the beef quality of Xianan.
引文
[1]D’Souza D N,Pethick D W,Dunshea F R,et al.Nutritional manipulation increases intramuscular fat levels in the Longissimus muscle of female finisher pigs[J].Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,2003,54(8):745-749.
    [2]Suzuki K,Irie M,Kadowaki H,et al.Genetic parameter estimates of meat quality traits in Duroc pigs selected for average daily gain,longissimus muscle area,backfat thickness,and intramuscular fat content.[J].Journal of Animal Science,2005,83(9):2058-2065.
    [3]Priolo A,Micol D,Agabriel G.Effects of grass feeling systems on ruminant meat color and flavor[J].Animal Research,2001,50:185-200.
    [4]孙鹏飞,崔占鸿,刘书杰,等.三江源区2岁高原型放牧牦牛增重和繁殖潜力评价[J].江西农业大学学报,2015,37(4):688-694.Sun P F,Cui Z H,Liu S J,et al.Weight gain and reproducing potential evaluation of 2 years old plateau grazing yak in Three-River Source Region[J].Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis,2015,37(4):688-694.
    [5]刘文生,旭日干,扎鲁达,等.黑毛和牛在内蒙古呼和浩特地区的繁育[J].中国牛业科学,2004,30(4):13-14.Liu W S,Xu R G,Zha L D,et al.Breeding and reproduction of Black Wagyu in Huhehaote of Inner Mongolia[J].Journal of Yellow Cattle Science,2004,30(4):13-14.
    [6]张彬,李丽立,薛立群,等.日本牛的遗传资源[J].家畜生态学报,2005,26(1):74-77.Zhang B,Li L L,Xue L Q,et al.Cattle genetic resources in Japan[J].Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici,2005,26(1):74-77.
    [7]Barton L,Bures D,Kotrba R,et al.Comparison of meat quality between eland(Taurotragus oryx)and cattle(Bos taurus)raised under similar conditions[J].Meat Science,2013,96(1):346-352.
    [8]Destefanis G,Brugiapaglia A,Barge M T,et al.Relationship between beef consumer tenderness perception and WarnerBratzler shear force[J].Meat Science,2008,78(3):153-156.
    [9]耿进怡.应用日本和牛改良本地黄牛效果的研究[J].黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2011(2)46-48.Geng J Y.Study on growth performance and carcass quality by grading hybridization from domestic cattle and Japanese Black Cattle[J].Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Algricultural University,2011(2)46-48.
    [10]段晨磊,孙静静.牛肉品质的评定指标及测定方法[J].饲料广角,2013(22):40.Duan C L,Sun J J.Evaluation index and method of beef quality[J].Feed China,2013(22):40.
    [11]Laborde F L.Breed effects on growth performance,carcass characteristic,fatty acid composition,and palatability attributes in finishing steers[J].J Anim Sci,2001,79:355-365
    [12]Li L Q,Tian W Q,Zan L S.Effects of age on quality of beef from Qinchuan cattle carcass[J].Agricultural Sciences in China,2011,10(11):1765-1771.
    [13]包淋斌,王灿宇,瞿明仁,等.大豆素对肉牛瘤胃发酵功能的影响[J].江西农业大学学报,2016,38(3):511-518.Bao L B,Wang C Y,Qu M R,et al.Effects of daidzein on rumen fermentation in beef cattle[J].Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis,2016,38(3):511-518.
    [14]包淋斌,欧阳克蕙,黎力之,等.豆粕、菜粕、棉粕在锦江黄牛瘤胃降解率测定[J].江西农业大学学报,2015,37(1):114-119.Bao L B,Ouyang K H,Li L Z,et al.Determination of effective degradability of dregs of soybean,rapeseed,cottonseed in rumen of Jinjiang Yellow Cattle[J].Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis,2015,37(1):114-119.
    [15]吴端钦,贺志雄,乔君毅,等.牛肉品质影响因素及改善技术的研究进展[J].肉类研究,2012,26(10):41-44.Wu D Q,He Z X,Qiao J Y,et al.Research progress on influencing factors and improvement technologies for beef quality[J].Meat Research,2012,26(10):41-44.
    [16]杜玮,于青云,周磊,等.不同品种犊牛及其不同部位的肉品质研究[J].中国畜牧兽医,2009,36(1):142-144.Du W,Yu Q Y,Zhou L,et al.The study of meat quality on the different site about various bull calves[J].China Animal Husbandry&Veterinary Medicine,2009,36(1):142-144.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700